Interindustry Knowledge Transfer and Absorption via Two Channels: The Case of Korea

References

• Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction, Econometrica, 60(2), pp. 323–351. 10.2307/2951599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayoumi, T., Coe, D. T. and Helpman, E. (1999) R&D spillovers and global growth, Journal of International Economics, 47(2), pp. 399–428. 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. I. and Mamuneas, T. P. (2006) R&D depreciation, stocks, user costs and productivity growth for US knowledge intensive industries, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17(1), pp. 70–98. 10.1016/j.strueco.2005.04.003
   Google Scholar
• BOK (1998–2010) Input-Output Tables (Seoul: Bank of Korea, Republic of Korea).
   Google Scholar
• Chiesa, V., Coughlan, P. and Voss, C. A. (1996) Development of technical innovation audit, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), pp. 105–136. 10.1016/0737-6782(95)00109-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989) Innovation and learning: The two races of R&D, The Economic Journal, 99(397), pp. 569–596. 10.2307/2233763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128–152. 10.2307/2393553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commandeur, J. J. F. and Heiser, W. J. (1993) Mathematical Derivations in the Proximity Scaling (PROXSCAL) of Symmetric Data Matrices (Leiden: Department of Data Theory, University of Leiden).
   Google Scholar
• Coombs, R., Narandren, P. and Richards, A. (1996) A literature-based innovation output indicator, Research Policy, 25(3), pp. 403–413. 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00842-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBresson, C. (1996) Economic Interdependence and Innovative Activity: An Input-Output Analysis (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Drejer, I. (2000) Comparing patterns of industrial interdependence in national systems of innovation – A study of Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan and the United States, Economic Systems Research, 12(3), pp. 377–399. 10.1080/09535310050120943
   Google Scholar
• Evenson, R. and Puttnam, J. (1988) The Yale-Canada patent flow concordance. Economic Growth Center Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. (1987) Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan (London: Pinter Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth, The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), pp. 92–116. 10.2307/3003321
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991) Quality ladders in the theory of growth, The Review of Economic Studies, 1(1), pp. 43–61. 10.2307/2298044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. (2007) Measuring the returns to R&D: The depreciation problem, NBER Working Paper 13473, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauknes, J. and Knell, M. (2009) Embodied knowledge and sectoral linkages: An input–output approach to the interaction of high- and low-tech industries, Research Policy, 38(3), pp. 459–469. 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, A. B. (1986) Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 984–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KISTEP (2000–2010) Survey of Research and Development in Korea (Seoul: Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, Republic of Korea).
   Google Scholar
• KIPO (2008) Study on the Development of the Linkage Table with Patent Classification and Korea Standard Industrial Classification (Daejeon: Korean Intellectual Property Office, Republic of Korea).
   Google Scholar
• Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M. A. and Montresor, S. (1996) Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: Network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany, Research Policy, 25(3), pp. 415–430. 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00843-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1988) Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation, in: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (Eds.) Technical Change and Economic Growth (London: Pinter Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (London: Pinter Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P. (1997) Input-output analysis of interindustry R&D spillovers, Economic Systems Research, 9(1), pp. 3–8. 10.1080/09535319700000001
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2002) Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2003) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003 (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Papaconstantinou, G., Sakurai, N. and Wyckoff, A. (1998) Domestic and international product-embodied R&D diffusion, Research Policy, 27(3), pp. 301–314. 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J., Lee, H. and Park, Y. (2009) Disembodied knowledge flows among industrial clusters: A patent analysis of the Korean manufacturing sector, Technology in Society, 31(1), pp. 73–84. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.10.011
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y.-T. and Kim, M.-S. (1999) A taxonomy of industries based on knowledge flow structure, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 11(4), pp. 541–549. 10.1080/095373299107320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy, 13(6), pp. 343–373. 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, M., Townsend, J. and Pavitt, K. (1988) Sectoral patterns of production and use of innovations in the UK: 1945–1983, Research Policy, 17(1), pp. 1–14. 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1990) Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), pp. S71–S102. 10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P. (1997) Innovation systems and evolutionary theories, in: C. Edquist (Ed.) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations (London: Pinter Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. (1982) Inter-industry technology flows in the United States, Research Policy, 11(4), pp. 227–245. 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90011-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnabl, H. (1995) The subsystem-MFA: A quantitative method for analyzing national innovation systems: The case of Germany, Economic Systems Research, 7(4), pp. 383–396. 10.1080/09535319500000003
   Google Scholar
• STEPI (2002) Korean Innovation Survey 2002 (Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Terleckyj, N. E. (1974) Effects of R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study. Technical Report 140 (Washington DC: National Planning Association).
   Google Scholar
• Terleckyj, N. E. (1980) Direct and indirect effects of industrial research and development on the productivity growth of industries, in: J. W. Kendrick and B. N. Vaccara (Eds.) New Development in Productivity Measurement and Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• van Meijl, H. (1997) Measuring the impact of direct and indirect R&D on the productivity growth of industries: Using the Yale technology concordance, Economic Systems Research, 9(2), pp. 205–211. 10.1080/09535319700000014
   Google Scholar
• van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (1997) Issues in assessing the effect of interindustry R&D spillovers, Economic Systems Research, 9(4), pp. 331–356. 10.1080/09535319700000030
   Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B. (1997) Measuring intersectoral spillovers: Estimates from the European and US patent office databases, Economics Systems Research, 9(1), pp. 47–65. 10.1080/09535319700000004
   Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B. and Loo, I. D. (1999) Technology spillovers between sectors and over time, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60, pp. 215–235. 10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. N. (1997) Spillovers, linkages and technical change, Economic Systems Research, 9(1), pp. 9–23. 10.1080/09535319700000002
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. N. and Nadiri, M. I. (1993) Spillover effects, linkage structure, and research and development, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 4(2), pp. 315–331. 10.1016/0954-349X(93)90022-C
   Google Scholar