Assessing the spatial equity of Seoul’s public transportation using the Gini coefficient based on its accessibility

References

• Adler, T., & Ben-Akiva, M. (1979). A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 13(3), 243–257. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(79)90016-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, K., Kato, H., & Hayashi, Y. (2009). Economic and equity evaluation of Delhi metro. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 13(2), 187–203. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2009.9693657
   Google Scholar
• Calthrope, P. (1993). The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. (1996). Mixed land-uses and commuting: Evidence from the American housing survey. Transportation A, 30, 361–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., & Liao, C. (2011). Exploring an integrated method for measuring the relative spatial equity in public facilities in the context of urban parks. Cities, 28, 361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G. (2004). Gap analysis of public transport needs: Measuring spatial distribution of public transport needs and identifying gaps in the quality of public transport provision. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1895(1), 137–146. doi: 10.3141/1895-18
   Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Wallis, I. (1992). Determining priorities for passenger transport funding: The needs assessment approach. In Papers of the AustralAsian Transport Research Forum October 1992, Canberra, volume 7, part 1. Quoted in Delbosc, A. & Currie, G. (2011) “Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity”. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans IV, J. E., Pratt, R. H., Stryker, A., & Kuzmyak, J. R. (2007). Transit oriented development report 95. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, N., Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). Towards equitable transit: Examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996–2006. Journal of Transport Geography, 29, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridstrom, L., Minken, H., & Vold, A. (2001, September 10–12). The income distribution effect of road pricing: A modelling case study. Proceedings OF the AET European Transport Conference, Homerton College, Cambridge. UK-CD-ROM. Quoted in Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252–1259.
   Google Scholar
• Gini, C. W. (1912). Variability and mutability, contribution to the study of statistical distributions and relations. Studi Economico-Giuricici della R. Universita de Cagliari.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2012). An appraisal of the urban scheme for sustainable urban transport. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 16(3), 261–278. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2012.735421
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, E., Cervero, R., & Tischler, D. (2012). Half-mile circle: Does it best represent transit station catchments? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2276, 101–109. doi: 10.3141/2276-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidich, A. B., & Ioannidis, J. (2004). The Gini coefficient as a measure for understanding accrual inequalities in multicenter clinical studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(4), 341–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S. (1993). A cycle of dependence: Automobile, accessibility, and the evolution of the transportation and retail hierarchies. Berkeley Planning Journal, 8, 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., & Clifton, K. (2001, September/December). Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: Possibilities and practicalities. Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 4(2/3), 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use? Journal of the American Planning Association, 25(1), 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, Y., & Jang, S. (2015). Comparing travel characteristics of social exclusion and general group. The 13th International Congress of the Asian Planning Schools Association (APSA 2015), 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Keeble, D., Owens, P. L., & Thompson, C. (1982). Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European community. Regional Studies, 16, 419–432. doi: 10.1080/09595238200185421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. Y., & Jun, B. W. (2012). Environmental equity analysis of the accessibility to public transportation services in Daegu city. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies, 15(1), 76–86. ( in Korean). doi: 10.11108/kagis.2012.15.1.076
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Lee, J., & Choi, S. (2015). Balancing mobility and CO2 reduction by a mode share scheme: A comparison of Los Angeles and Seoul metropolitan areas. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 19(2), 168–181. doi: 10.1080/12265934.2014.970569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, U., & Noland, R. B. (2012). Does the commute mode affect the frequency of walking behavior? The public transit link. Transport Policy, 21, 26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W., Na, Y., Park, S., Lee, B., & Joh, C. (2012). Transportation equity analysis based on the metropolitan household survey. Urban Ggeography, 15(1), 75–86. ( in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Yi, C., & Hong, S. P. (2013). Urban structural hierarchy and the relationship between the ridership of the Seoul metropolitan subway and the land-use pattern of the station areas. Cities, 35, 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, D. (1998). Accessibility and the journey to work. Journal of Transport Geography, 6(1), 11–21. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(97)00036-7
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. J., & Gau, C. C. (2006). A TOD planning model to review the regulation of allowable development densities around subway stations. Land Use Policy, 23, 353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2006). Evaluating transportation equity: Guidance for incorporating distributional impacts in transportation planning. Victoria, BC: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209–219. Quoted in Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011) “Using Lorenz curves to assess public transport equity”. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1252–1259. doi: 10.2307/2276207
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K., Golub, A., & Robinson, G. (2012). A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(2), 684–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T., & Davis, R. (2001). Equity in regional service provision. Journal of Regional Science, 41(4), 557–600. doi: 10.1111/0022-4146.00233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, S., & Morrall, J. (1996). Walking distances to and from light-rail transit stations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1538, 19–26. doi: 10.3141/1538-03
   Google Scholar
• Park, S.-Y. (2012). A study on the methods of evaluating and indicators development for quasi-public operating system (Ph. D dissertation). Chonnam National University (in Korean).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. (1973). An economic comparison of urban railways and express bus services. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 7, 20–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, H., & Oh, J. T. (2011). Transit-oriented development in a high-density city: Identifying its association with transit ridership in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 28(1), 70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirachini, A., Hensher, D. A., & Jara-Diaz, S. R. (2010). Comparing operator and users costs of light rail, heavy rail and bus rapid transit over a radial public transport network. Research in Transportation Economics, 29(1), 231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2010.07.029
   Google Scholar
• Tsou, K., Hung, Y., & Chang, Y. (2005). An accessibility-based integrated measure of relative spatial equity in urban public facilities. Cities, 22, 424–435. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, M. (1996). Reduction of CO2 emissions of transport by reorganisation of urban activities. In Y. Hayashi & J. Roy (Eds.), Transport, land-use and the environment (pp. 103–124). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B. M., & Hine, J. P. (2003). A PTAL approach to measuring changes in bus service accessibility. Transport Policy, 10(4), 307–320. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(03)00053-2
   Google Scholar
• Yao, X. (2007). Where are public transit needed – Examining potential demand for public transit for commuting trips. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 31(2), 535–550. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar