Open space premium near commercial zones – a case study in the City of Corona, California

References

• Abbott, J. K., & Klaiber, H. A. (2010). Is all space created equal? Uncovering the relationship between competing land uses in subdivisions. Ecological Economics, 70, 296–307. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. R., & West, S. F. (2006). Open space, residential property values and spatial context. Regional Science & Urban Economics, 36, 773–789. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2006.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L., Betam, A. K., Florax, R., & Yoon, M. J. (1998). Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(1), 77–104. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bark, R. H., Osgood, D. E., Colby, B. G., & Halper, E. B. (2011). How do homebuyers value different types of green space? Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 36(2), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chay, K. Y., & Greenstone, M. (2005). Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257–1278.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D. E. (2006). Externality effects on residential property values: The example of noise disamenities. Gowth and Change, 37, 460–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2257.2006.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, D., Li, C. Q., Wolch, J., Kahle, C., & Jerrett, M. (2010). A spatial autocorrelation approach for examining the effects of urban greenspace on residential property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance & Economics, 41, 150–169. doi: 10.1007/s11146-008-9159-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cropper, M. L., Deck, L. C., & McConnell, K. E. (1988). On the choice of functional form for hedonic price functions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(4), 668–675. doi: 10.2307/1935831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Acci, L. (2014). Approaches to assess urban quality of life and pleasantness in cities (hedonic price, willingness-to-pay, positional value, life, satisfaction, isobenefit lines). Social Indicators Research, 115(2), 531–559. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0221-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, B. J., & Hoehn, J. P. (2004). Hedonic analysis of hazardous waste sites in the presence of other urban disamenities. Environmental Science Policy, 7, 499–508. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faux, J., & Perry, G. M. (1999). Estimating irrigation water using hedonic price analysis: A case study in malheur county. Oregon, Land Economics, 75, 440–452. doi: 10.2307/3147189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, S., Mourato, S., & Resende, G. M. (2014). The amenity value of English nature: A hedonic price approach. Environment & Resource Economics, 57, 175–196. doi: 10.1007/s10640-013-9664-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeghegen, J. (2002). The value of open space in residential land use. Land Use Policy, 19, 91–98. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00040-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstone, M., & Gallagher, J. (2000). Does hazardous waste matter? Evidence from the housing market and the superfund program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 951–1003. doi: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.951
   Google Scholar
• Ham, C., Champ, P. A., Loomis, J. B., & Reich, R. M. (2012). Accounting for heterogeneity of public lands in property models. Land Economics, 88(3), 444–456. doi: 10.3368/le.88.3.444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, E. G., & Bockstael, N. (2001). The problem of identifying land use spillovers: Measuring the effects of open space on residential property values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83, 698–704. doi: 10.1111/0002-9092.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. W., Phipps, T. T., & Anselin, T. (2003). Measuring the benefit of air quality improvement: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 24–39. doi: 10.1016/S0095-0696(02)00013-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., & Robb, A. L. (1986). On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 715–719. doi: 10.2307/1924536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuethe, T. H. (2012). Spatial fragmentation and the value of residential housing. Land Economics, 88(1), 16–27. doi: 10.3368/le.88.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuminoff, N. V., Parameter, C. F., & Pope, J. C. (2010). Which hedonic models can we trust to recover the marginal willingness to pay for environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60, 145–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2010.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L., & Acharya, G. (2006). Environmental quality and housing market: Does lot size matter? Marine Resource Economics, 21, 317–330. doi: 10.1086/mre.21.3.42629514
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, D. H., Crossman, M. D., Mahmoudi, P., Taylor, L. O., Summer, D. M., & Boxall, P. C. (2010). The value of public and private green spaces under water restrictions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95(4), 192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, C., Pattanayak, S. K., McDow, W., McDonald, R., & Halpin, P. (2005). Shades of green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market. Journal of Forest Economics, 11(3), 177–199. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, V., & Walls, M. (2005). The value of open space: evidence from studies of non-market benefits (Working Paper. Resources for the Future.). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Land Cover Database. (2001). Retrieved from http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd01_leg.php
   Google Scholar
• Palmquist, R.B. (1991). Hedonic methods. In J. B. Braden & C. D. Kolstad (Eds.), Hedonic method in measuring the demand for environmental quality. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Payton, S., Lindsey, G., Wilson, J., Ottensmann, J. R., & Man, J. (2008). Valuing the benefis of the urban forest; a spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(6), 717–736. doi: 10.1080/09640560802423509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ready, R. C., & Abdalla, C. W. (2005). The amenity and disamenity impacts of agriculture: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(2), 314–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00724.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riverside County. (2015). RCIT Geographic Information Services, Riverside County GIS Open Data Portal. Retrieved from http://gis.rivcoit.org/GISData.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 34–55. doi: 10.1086/260169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander, H. A., & Polasky, S. (2009). The value of views and open space: Estimates from a hedonic pricing model for ramsey county, minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics, 26, 837–845.
   Google Scholar
• Saphores, J.-D., & Li, W. (2012). Estimating the value of urban green areas: A hedonic pricing analysis of the single family housing market in Los Angeles, CA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104(3–4), 373–387. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y., & Knaap, G.-J. (2004). Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, 663–680. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Census of Bureau. (2010). State & county quick facts. Retrieved from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml
   Google Scholar
• Von Graevenitz, K., & Panduro, T. E. (2015). An alternative to the standard spatial econometric approaches in hedonic house price models. Land Economics, 91(2), 386–409. doi: 10.3368/le.91.2.386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B. (2005). Images of america – Corona. Charleston: Arcadia Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., Simonit, S., Connors, J. P., Kinzig, A. P., & Perrings, C. (2014). The value of off-site ecosystem service flows: Deforestation, erosion, and the amenity value of lakes in prescott, Arizona. Ecological Economics, 97, 74–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar