Modelling transport-related pollution emissions for the synthetic baseline population of a large Canadian university

References

• Akar, G., Flynn, C., & Namgung, M. (2012). Travel choices and links to transportation demand management: Case study at Ohio State University. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 2319. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Balsas, C. J. L. (2003). Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses. Transport Policy, 10(1), 35–49. doi: 10.1016/S0967-070X(02)00028-8
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., Mason, C., & Stanley, K. (1999). Travel demand management: Policy context and an application by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) as a large trip generator. Transport Engineering in Australia, 5(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. J., Wang, H., & Winebrake, J. J. (2009). The effectiveness and costs of speed reductions on emissions from international shipping. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 593–598. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daisy, N. S., Hafezi, M. H., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2018a). Housing location and commuting mode choices of university students and employees: An application of bivariate probit model. Planning, Sustainability, and Infrastructure Systems: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 4, 168–179.
   Google Scholar
• Daisy, N. S., Hafezi, M. H., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2018b). Understanding and modeling the activity-travel behavior of university commuters at a large Canadian university. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 4(2), 04018006. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000442
   Google Scholar
• Daisy, N. S., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2018). Trip chaining propensity and tour mode choice of out-of-home workers: Evidence from a mid-sized Canadian city. Transportation, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Daisy, N. S., Millward, H., & Liu, L. (2018). Trip chaining and tour mode choice of non-workers grouped by daily activity patterns. Journal of Transport Geography, 69, 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENR. (2016a). Environment and climate change Canada. Retrieved from https://www.ec.gc.ca/indicateurs-indicators/default.asp?lang=en&n=F60DB708-1]
   Google Scholar
• ENR. (2016b). Environment and natural resources - Local weather forecasts. Retrieved from https://weather.gc.ca/city/pages/ns-19_metric_e.html]
   Google Scholar
• Eom, J. K., Stone, J. R., & Ghosh, S. K. (2009). Daily activity patterns of university students. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(4), 141–149. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezi, M. H. (2018). Modeling activity selection and scheduling behavior of population cohorts within an activity-based travel demand model system. PhD thesis. Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hafezi, M. H., Daisy, N. S., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2018). Emissions analysis for synthetic baseline population of a large Canadian university. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hafezi, M. H., Daisy, N. S., Millward, H., & Liu, L. (2018). Commuting to campus: Findings from the Dalhousie EnACT Travel Survey. Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hafezi, M. H., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2017a). A time-use activity-pattern recognition model for activity-based travel demand modeling. Transportation, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hafezi, M. H., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2017b). Identification of representative patterns of time use activity through fuzzy C-means clustering. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2668), 38–50. doi: 10.3141/2668-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezi, M. H., Liu, L., & Millward, H. (2018). Learning daily activity sequences of population groups using random forest theory. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heung, V. C. S., & Leong, J. S. L. (2006). Travel demand and behavior of university students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 11(1), 81–96. doi: 10.1080/10941660500500766
   Google Scholar
• HRM. (2016). Halifax transit moving forward together plan. Halifax Regional Municipality. Retrieved from https://www.halifax.ca/sites/default/files/documents/transportation/halifax-transit/MFTP_PlanOnly.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jorgenson, D. W., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1993). Reducing US carbon emissions: An econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics, 15(1), 7–25. doi: 10.1016/0928-7655(93)90016-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, A., Wang, X., Son, S., & Agnello, P. (2011). University student travel in Virginia: Is it different from the general population. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 2255. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Koupal, J., Michaels, H., Cumberworth, M., Bailey, C., & Brzezinski, D. (2002). EPA’s plan for MOVES: A comprehensive mobile source emissions model. Proceedings of the 12th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. N., Pettersen, J., Solli, C., & Hertwich, E. G. (2013). Investigating the carbon footprint of a university - The case of NTNU. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letete, T. C. M., Mungwe, N. W., Guma, M., & Marquard, A. (2011). Carbon footprint of the University of Cape Town. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 22, 2–12. doi: 10.17159/2413-3051/2011/v22i2a3208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. (2011). Generating disaggregate population characteristics for input to travel-demand models. Gainesville: University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Mathez, A., Manaugh, K., Chakour, V., El-Geneidy, A., & Hatzopoulou, M. (2013). How can we alter our carbon footprint? Estimating GHG emissions based on travel survey information. Transportation, 40(1), 131–149. doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9415-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum, D., & Yang, C. (2009). Achieving deep reductions in US transport greenhouse gas emissions: Scenario analysis and policy implications. Energy Policy, 37(12), 5580–5596. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitloehner, F. (2016). Quantification of the emission reduction benefits of mitigation strategies for dairy silage. Davis: California Air Resources Board.
   Google Scholar
• NRN. (2016). GeoBase - National Road Network (NRN) - NS, Nova Scotia. Retrieved from http://geogratis.gc.ca/api/en/nrcan-rncan/ess-sst/28fd9d45-5680-4dc7-b016-9a56bbab88eb.html]
   Google Scholar
• Ou, X., Zhang, X., & Chang, S. (2010). Scenario analysis on alternative fuel/vehicle for China’s future road transport: Life-cycle energy demand and GHG emissions. Energy Policy, 38(8), 3943–3956. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. M., Jacoby, H. D., Gurgel, A. C., Metcalf, G. E., Sokolov, A. P., & Holak, J. F. (2008). Assessment of US GHG cap-and-trade proposals. Climate Policy, 8(4), 395–420. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross Morrow, W., Gallagher, K. S., Collantes, G., & Lee, H. (2010). Analysis of policies to reduce oil consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions from the US transportation sector. Energy Policy, 38(3), 1305–1320. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, T., Giles-Corti, B., Pikora, T., Bulsara, M., Shilton, T., & Bull, F. (2006). Active commuting in a university setting: Assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change. Transport Policy, 13(3), 240–253. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, P., Schew, W. A., Sawant, A., Kolwaite, K. J., & Strode, S. A. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. Institutions of higher education. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 60(5), 568–573. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.5.568
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stanley, J. K., Hensher, D. A., & Loader, C. (2011). Road transport and climate change: Stepping off the greenhouse gas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10), 1020–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics-Canada. (2015). Canadian vehicle survey: Annual (53-223-X).
   Google Scholar
• Takeshita, T. (2012). Assessing the co-benefits of CO2 mitigation on air pollutants emissions from road vehicles. Applied Energy, 97, 225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J., & Barrett, J. (2015). Exploring the applications of carbon footprinting towards sustainability at a UK university: Reporting and decision making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 164–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva, K., Giles-Corti, B., & McCormack, G. (2008). Achieving 10,000 steps: A comparison of public transport users and drivers in a university setting. Preventive Medicine, 47(3), 338–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Khattak, A., & Son, S. (2012). What can be learned from analyzing university student travel demand? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 2322. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, pp. 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Spinney, J., Millward, H., Scott, D., Hayden, A., & Tyedmers, P. (2013). Blame the exurbs, not the suburbs: Exploring the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions within a city region. Energy Policy, 62, 1329–1335. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., McCollum, D., McCarthy, R., & Leighty, W. (2009). Meeting an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transportation by 2050: A case study in California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(3), 147–156. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2008.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar