Urban design empowerment through ICT-based platforms in Europe

References

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannon, L. J., & Ehn, P. (2012). Design matters in participatory design. In Routledge handbook of participatory design (pp. 37–63). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, S. (2017). From citizen participation to real ownership. Architectural Design, 87(1), 58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyko, C. T., Cooper, R., & Davey, C. (2005). Sustainability and the urban design process. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, 158(3), 119–125.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at Threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1122–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013). Designing public participation processes. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. (2014). The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design, 19(1), 2–36.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D. M. (1988). A new ladder of citizen participation. National Civic Review, 77(3), 249–257.
   Google Scholar
• De Buysere, K., Gajda, O., Kleverlaan, R., Marom, D., & Klaes, M. (2012). A framework for European crowdfunding. Retrieved from http://eurocrowd.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/sites/85/2013/06/Framework_Eu_Crowdfunding.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Reuver, M., Stein, S., & Hampe, J. F. (2013). From eParticipation to mobile participation: Designing a service platform and business model for mobile participation. Information Polity, 18(1), 57–73.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, M., De Lange, M., & Bouw, M. (2017). The hackable city: Citymaking in a platform society. Architectural Design, 87(1), 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decide Madrid web platform. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.madridforyou.es/en/decide-madrid-web-platform
   Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., & Bhagwatwar, A. (2012). Citizen apps to solve complex urban problems. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(3), 107–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desouza, K. C., & Bhagwatwar, A. (2014). Technology-enabled participatory platforms for civic engagement: The case of US cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(4), 25–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertiö, T. P. (2015). Participatory apps for urban planning—space for improvement. Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), 303–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools. Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), 397–408.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J. S., & Kubinski, B. (2015). There’s an App for that: Mobile applications that advance urban planning. In Emerging issues, challenges, and opportunities in urban E-planning (pp. 33–45). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Digital participatory platforms for co-production in urban development: A systematic review. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(3), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2012). Electronic participation technologies and perceived outcomes for local government managers. Public Management Review, 14(6), 815–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A., & Crewe, K. (2009). New visions for suburbia: Reassessing aesthetics and place-making in modernism, imageability and new urbanism. Journal of Urban Design, 14(4), 415–438.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The theory of affordances. In The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 127–143). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., & Koo, G. (2008). Placeworlds: Using virtual worlds to foster civic engagement. Space and Culture, 11(3), 204–221.
   Google Scholar
• Hasler, S., Chenal, J., & Soutter, M. (2017). Digital tools as a means to foster inclusive, data-informed urban planning. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 5, 230–239.
   Google Scholar
• Höffken, S., & Streich, B. (2013). Mobile participation: Citizen engagement in urban planning via smartphones. In Citizen e-participation in urban governance: Crowdsourcing and collaborative creativity (pp. 199–225). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Public Participation. (2007). IAP2 spectrum of public participation. Retrieved from https://www.iap2.org.au/Tenant/C0000004/00000001/files/IAP2_Public_Participation_Spectrum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jutraž, A., & Le Moine, J. (2016). Breaking out: New freedoms in urban (re)design work by adding immersive environments. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(2), 103–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klamert, K., & Münster, S. (2017). Child’s play: A literature-based Survey on gamified tools and methods for fostering public participation in urban planning. In International Conference on Electronic participation (pp. 24–33). Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R., Van Ham, M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2015). Using social media and mobile technologies to foster engagement and self-organisation in participatory urban planning and neighbourhood governance. Planning Practice & Research, 30(3), 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. (2006). Roles and challenges of urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 11(2), 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2015). E-governance innovation: Barriers and strategies. Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 198–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miessen, M. (2010). The nightmare of participation. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Münster, S., Georgi, C., Heijne, K., Klamert, K., Noennig, J. R., Pump, M., … van der Meer, H. (2017). How to involve inhabitants in urban design planning by using digital tools? An overview on a state of the art, key challenges and promising approaches. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 2391–2405.
   Google Scholar
• Noyman, A., Sakai, Y., & Larson, K. (2018). Cityscopear: Urban design and crowdsourced engagement platform. In CHI 2018 CHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Pak, B. (2016). ICT-enabled bottom-up architectural design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 10(1), 26–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, B., Chua, A., & Vande Moere, A. (2017). Fixmystreet Brussels: Socio-demographic inequality in crowdsourced civic participation. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(2), 65–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, B., & Verbeke, J. (2014a). Geoweb 2.0 for participatory urban design: Affordances and critical success factors. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 12(3), 283–305.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, B., & Verbeke, J. (2014b). Geoweb 2.0 and design empowerment: A critical evaluation of eleven cases. In Digital Humanities 2014 Conference Proceedings (pp. 290–292).
   Google Scholar
• Poorazizi, M. E., Steiniger, S., & Hunter, A. J. (2015). A service-oriented architecture to enable participatory planning: An e-planning platform. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(7), 1081–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poplin, A. (2012). Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(3), 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha, E. M. (1997). A ladder of empowerment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 17(1), 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., Brandt, E., & Binder, T. (2010, November). A framework for organizing the tools and techniques of participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial participatory design Conference (pp. 195–198). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Saxton, G. D., Oh, O., & Kishore, R. (2013). Rules of crowdsourcing: Models, issues, and systems of control. Information Systems Management, 30(1), 2–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, C. (2014, May). Mobile participation in urban development. International Reports on Socio-Informatics (IRSI), Proceedings of the COOP 2014 Workshop on Collaborative Technologies in Democratic Processes, 11(1), 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, C. (2015). Through space and time: Using mobile apps for urban participation. Conference for e-democracy and open government (133–142).
   Google Scholar
• Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senbel, M., & Church, S. P. (2011). Design empowerment: The limits of accessible visualization media in neighborhood densification. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(4), 423–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinø, N. (2013). Urban design and planning: One object-two theoretical realms. NA, 17(2), 63–85.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, M. R., & Novo, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of e-participation. The role of social networks and e-government over citizens’ online engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 31(3), 379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warf, B. (2013). Web 2.0, neogeography and urban e-governance. In C. N. Silva (Ed.), Citizen e-participation in urban governance: Crowdsourcing and collaborative creativity: Crowdsourcing and collaborative creativity (pp. 69–79). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Yagmur-Kilimci, E. S. (2010). 3D mental visualization in architectural design (Doctoral dissertation). Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2014). Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction. Information Systems Frontiers, 16(3), 417–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York, NY: Basic Book.
   Google Scholar