Do institutional designs matter for planning review? A garbage-can simulation approach

References

• Alexander, E. R. (2005). Institutional transformation and planning: From institutionalization theory to institutional design. Planning Theory, 4(3), 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2006). Institutional design for sustainable development. Town Planning Review, 77(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. (2017). Chance and design: From architecture to institutional design. Journal of the American Planning Association, 83(1), 93–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1970). Social choices and individual values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1994). Complexity in economic theory: Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. AER Papers and Proceedings, 84, 406–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (2015). Complexity and the economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bak, P. (1996). How nature works. New York: Springer-Verlag, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. (2005). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolan, R. S. (1991). Planning and institutional design. Planning Theory, 5(6), 7–34.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. (2018). Reviewing design review in London. http://placealliance.org.uk/research/design-review/
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. (2019). Marketizing the governance of design: Design review in England. Journal of Urban Design, 24(4), 523–555. doi:10.1080/13574809.2018.1533373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPNYC. (2019). “Application Process Applicant Portal, Department of City Planning.” The New York Cityhttps://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/applicants/applicant-portal/application-process.page
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. (2013). Design review – principles and practice. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/DC%20Cabe%20Design%20Review%2013_W_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guler, I. (2007). Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 248–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D. (1981). The decision to plan: Planning activities as public goods. In W. R. Lierop & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Urban infrastructure, location, and housing (pp. 237–296). Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, L. D. (2001). Urban development: The logic of making plans. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S.-K. (1998). From organized anarchy to controlled structure: Effects of planning on the garbage-can decision processes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S.-K. (2006). A spatial garbage – can model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(1), 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S.-K. (2018). Why plans matter for cities. Cities, 73, 91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, S.-K. (2021). Planning within complex urban systems. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, S.-K., Han, H., & Ko, P.-C. (2013). Are cities dissipative structures? International Journal of Urban Sciences, 17(1), 46–55.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NYC. (2019). Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP). Department of City Planning, New York City. https://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/applicants/applicant-portal/step5-ulurp-rules.page
   Google Scholar
• Pittsburgh. (2016). Design review process. http://pittsburghpa.gov/dcp/
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. (2000). Self-Organization and the city. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varakantham, P. (2016). Sequential decision making for improving efficiency in urban environments. Proceeding of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: IJCAI 2016, New York; United States; 2016 July 9–15. Research Collection School of Information Systems. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3601.
   Google Scholar