National borders transcended: the impact of geographical proximity on the growth of global innovation networks among cities in East Asia

References

• Albert-Cromarias, A., & Asselineau, A. (2013). Proximity cooperation driving innovation: The Naturopˆole case-file. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 11(3), 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, D. E., Gunessee, S., Matthiessen, C. W., & Find, S. (2014). The geography of Chinese science. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(12), 2950–2971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ascani, A., Bettarelli, L., Resmini, L., & Balland, P.-A. (2020). Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 49(8), 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., & Ravet, J. (2019). Network dynamics in collaborative research in the EU, 2003–2017. European Planning Studies, 27(9), 1811–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balland, P.-A., Rigby, D., & Boschma, R. (2015). The technological resilience of US cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(2), 167–184. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsv007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab´asi, A. L., Jeong, H., Ńeda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3-4), 590–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berǵe, L. R. (2017). Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4), 785–815. Retrieved from https://rsaiconnect.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pirs.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, T., & Broekel, T. (2011). Methodological issues in measuring innovation performance of spatial units. Industry and Innovation, 18(1), 7–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekel, T., Balland, P. A., Burger, M., & van Oort, F. (2014). Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: A discussion of four methods. Annals of Regional Science, 53(2), 423–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. (1991). Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Cano-Kollmann, M., Hannigan, T. J., & Mudambi, R. (2018). Global innovation networks – organizations and people. Journal of International Management, 24(2), 87–92. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., Derudder, B., & Peng, Z. (2019). Interaction between different forms of proximity in inter-organizational scientific collaboration: The case of medical sciences research network in the Yangtze River Delta region. Papers in Regional Science, 98(5), 1903–1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (1999). An introduction to the information age. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., & Plechero, M. (2015). Do regions make a difference? Regional innovation systems and global innovation networks in the ICT industry. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 215–237. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.861806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. B., Lai, K. K., & Chang, S. M. (2009). Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: Using the patent citation network. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-H. (2004). Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and the connection with the global innovation network. Research Policy, 33(2), 337–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., Davies, C., & Wilson, R. (2002). Innovation advantages of cities: From knowledge to equity in five basic steps. European Planning Studies, 10, 233–250. doi:10.1080/09654310120114517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. (2017). Complex spaces: Global innovation networks & territorial innovation systems in information & communication technologies. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(2), 9. doi:10.1186/s40852-017-0060-5
   Google Scholar
• Dadashpoor, H., & Yousefi, Z. (2018). Centralization or decentralization? A review on the effects of information and communication technology on urban spatial structure. Cities, 78(September 2017), 194–205.
   Google Scholar
• Dahesh, M. B., Tabarsa, G., Zandieh, M., & Hamidizadeh, M. (2020, September). Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis. Technology in Society, 63, 101399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., & McFarland, D. A. (2013). Ties that last. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(1), 69–110. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0001839212474272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/networks-crowds-and-markets/A70C7855A3003FE1079C25F8397AF641
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networking, 1. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Ponds, R., & Van Oort, F. (2010). The citation impact of research collaboration in science-based industries: A spatial-institutional analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 351–271. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00309.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda, R., Kidokoro, T., Seta, F., & Sato, R. (2019). Relocations are determined by firms’ relationships with financing institutions: A paper based on network data for Japanese firms. Papers in Regional Science, 98(October 2017), 1685–1712. doi:10.1111/pirs.12425
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E., Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2010). Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy. Research Policy, 39(6), 748–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Ponzetto, G. A. M., & Zou, Y. (2016). Urban networks: Connecting markets, people, and ideas. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1), 17–59. Retrieved from https://rsaiconnect.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pirs.12216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 91. doi:10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Pain, K. (2006). The polycentric metropolis: Learning from mega-city regions in Europe. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781849773911
   Google Scholar
• Hazir, C. S., LeSage, J. P., & Autant-Bernard, C. (2014). The role of R&D collaboration networks on regional innovation performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Retrieved from http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2507284
   Google Scholar
• Hennemann, S., & Derudder, B. (2014). An alternative approach to the calculation and analysis of connectivity in the world city network. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(3), 392–412. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b39108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. American Economic Review, 54, 761–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue, H., Souma, W., & Tamada, S. (2007). Spatial characteristics of joint application networks in Japanese patents. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 383(1), 152–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. (1995). R & D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamakura, N., & Matsubara, H. (2012). Global knowledge linkage by multinational companies and geographical agglomerations of R&D. Annals of the Association of Economic Geographers, 58(2), 118–137.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Phelps, N. (2018a). Megalopolis unbound: Knowledge collaboration and functional polycentricity within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta Region in China, 2014. Urban Studies, 55(2), 443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Phelps, N. A. (2018b). Articulating China’s science and technology: Knowledge collaboration networks within and beyond the Yangtze River Delta megalopolis in China. Chinese Geographical Science, 28(2), 247–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., & Phelps, N. (2019). Megalopolitan glocalization: The evolving relational economic geography of intercity knowledge linkages within and beyond China’s Yangtze River Delta region, 2004-2014. Urban Geography, 40(9), 1310–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, H., & Kidokoro, T. (2017). Comparing a spatial structure of innovation network between Korea and Japan: Through the analysis of co-inventors’ network. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 1(1), 133–153. doi:10.1007/s41685-017-0037-1
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Liu, B., Han, J., & Chen, X. (2018). Industrial upgrading based on global innovation chains: A case study of Huawei technologies Co., Ltd. Shenzhen. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(3), 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Chaminade, C., & Asheim, B. (2013). The geography and structure of global innovation networks: A knowledge base perspective. European Planning Studies, 21(9), 1456–1473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, A. (2008). Knowledge networks in local and global space. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(6), 533–545. doi:10.1080/08985620802462124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H., Fang, C., Pang, B., & Li, G. (2014). The effect of geographical proximity on scientific cooperation among Chinese cities from 1990 to 2010. PloS One, 9(11), e111705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H., Fang, C., Pang, B., & Wang, S. (2015). Structure of Chinese city network as driven by technological knowledge flows. Chinese Geographical Science, 25(4), 498–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A., Nosvelli, M., & Uberti, T. E. (2007). Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: A European analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 471–493. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00130.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A., & Uberti, T. E. (2009). Knowledge networks across Europe: Which distance matters? Annals of Regional Science, 43(3 SPEC. ISS.), 691–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, A., Sharma, P., Pereira, V., & Temouri, Y. (2021). From regional innovation systems to global innovation hubs: Evidence of a Quadruple Helix from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 128, 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2013). Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1484–1498. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. W., Schwarz, A. W., & Find, S. (2002). The Top-level global research system, 1997-99: Centres, networks and nodality. An analysis based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 39(5-6), 903–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthiessen, C. W., Schwarz, A. W., & Find, S. (2010). World cities of scientific knowledge: Systems, networks and potential dynamics: An analysis based on bibliometric indicators. Urban Studies, 47(9), 1879–1897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morescalchi, A., Pammolli, F., Penner, O., Petersen, A. M., & Riccaboni, M. (2015). The evolution of networks of innovators within and across borders: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 44(3), 651–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudambi, R., Li, L., Ma, X., Makino, S., Qian, G., & Boschma, R. (2018). Zoom in, zoom out: Geographic scale and multinational activity. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(8), 929–941. doi:10.1057/s41267-018-0158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepelski, D., & De Prato, G. (2018). The structure and evolution of ICT global innovation network. Industry and Innovation, 25(10), 940–965. doi:10.1080/13662716.2017.1343129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 404–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., & Skvoretz, J. (2010). Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks, 32(3), 245–251. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873310000183?via%3Dihub
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 549–578. doi:10.1080/0034340032000108688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallet, A., & Torre, A. (1999). Is geographical proximity necessary in the innovation networks in the era of global economy? GeoJournal, 49(4), 373–380.
   Google Scholar
• Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2009). Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: Empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Papers in Regional Science, 88(3), 531–546. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ j.1435-5957.2008.00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi, K., Taima, M., Kidokoro, T., Seta, F., & Bureau, I. (2018). Analysis on spatial pattern of Japanese technological innovation based on patent data – focusing on sectoral innovation system. Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan, 53(2), 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, H.-H. H., & Chau, C.-F. W. (2020). Knowledge exchange in a global city: A typology of universities and institutional analysis. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2019.1694424
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2014). The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: Geographic proximity versus triadic closure. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3), 589–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A., & Rallet, A. (2005). Proximity and localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42. doi:10.2307/2393808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J., & Maier, G. (2006). ERSA conference participation: Does location matter? Papers in Regional Science, 85(4), 483–504. Retrieved from http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2006.00102.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verginer, L., & Riccaboni, M. (2021). Talent goes to global cities: The world network of scientists’ mobility. Research Policy, 50(1), 104127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Brenner, T. (2014). Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: A comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications. Annals of Regional Science, 53(2), 337–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, L., Li, J., & Li, J. (2020, June). Urban innovation and intercity patent collaboration: A network analysis of China’s national innovation system. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar