Exploring an Integrated Model of Governmental Agency Evaluation Utilization in Korea: Focusing on Executive Agency Evaluation

References

• Alkin, M. C. 1975. Evaluation: Who Needs It? Who Cares? Studies in Educational Evaluation 1: 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Alkin, M. C., and Taut, S. M. 2003. Unbundling Evaluation Use. Studies in Educational Evaluation 29(1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measures. Journal of Marketing Research 19: 453–460.
   Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., and Phillips, L. W. 1991. Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research. Administration Science Quarterly 36(3): 421–458.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, J. M., and Trice, H. M. 1982. The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. Administration Science Quarterly 27(4): 591–622.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, J. F., and Langbein, L. I. 1991. Factors Influencing the Use of Health Evaluation Research in Congress. Evaluation Review 15(5): 507- 532.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B. 2003. Utilization Effects of Participatory Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation, edited by T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, and L. A. Wingate. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L. M. 1992. The Case for Participatory Evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14(4): 397–418.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B., and Earl, L. M. 1995. Participatory Evaluation in Education: Studies in Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cousins, J. B., and Leithwood, K. A. 1986. Current Empirical Research on Evaluation Utilization. Review of Educational Research 56(3): 331–364.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Philips, D. C., Walker, D. F., and Weiner, S. S. 1980. Toward Reform of Program Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Finne, H., Levine, M., and Nilssen, T. 1995. Trailing Research: A Model for Useful Program Evaluation. Evaluation 1(1): 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Forss, K., Rebien, C. C., and Carlsson, J. 2002. Process Use of Evaluations: Types of Use that Precede Lessons Learned and Feedback. Evaluation 8(1): 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Garaway, G. B. 1995. Participatory Evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation 21: 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 1988a. Stakeholder Participation and Utilization in Program Evaluation. Evaluation Review 12(2): 91–116.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C. 1988b. Communication of Results and Utilization in Participatory Program Evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 11(4): 341–351.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Englewood: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2007. Public Management by Numbers: “Why Does It Vary? Where Has It Come From? Where are the Gaps and the Puzzles?” Public Money and Management 27(2): 95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, M. 1987. Steps toward an Integrated Model of Research Utilization. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 8(4): 586–611.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B. 1998. Toward a Theoretical Model of Evaluation Utilization. Evaluation and Program Planning 21(1): 93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Byoung-Seob, Jeong, Jin-Woo, and Im, Bo-Young. 2001. A Study on the Improvement of Executive Agencies. The Korean Journal of Public Administration 39(1): 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hyunku. 2006. The Logic and Problems of the Framework Act on Public Service Evaluation: An Analysis of the Institutional Elements of Evaluation Success. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation 16(4): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jong-Soo, and Jeong, Gil-Won. 1999. A Study of Agency: Analysis of the British Case and Policy Alternative for Korea. Social Science Review 30: 151–175.
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., and Hong, S. 1999. Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods 4: 84–99.
   Google Scholar
• Mardia, K. V. 1970. Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications. Biometrika 57: 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, Melvin M., and Henry, Gary T. 2004. The Mechanisms and Outcomes of Evaluation Influence. Evaluation 10(1): 35–57.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Cheol-Ho. 2002. Utilization of Policy Evaluation: Logic and Reality. Korean Policy Studies Review 11(4): 415–456.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1997. Utilization Focused Evaluation (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Preskill, H., Zuckerman, B., and Matthews, B. 2003. An Exploratory Study of Process Use: Findings and Implications for Future Research. American Journal of Evaluation 24(4): 423–442.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, K. 1992. Alternative Estimation Methods in Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL-7: Effects of Noncontinuity and Nonnormality of Variables with Varing Sample Sizes. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Rho, Yujine, and Ahn, Moon-Suk. 2004. The Factors Influencing Policy Evaluation Utilization and the Types of Evaluation Utilization in the Korean Government. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation 14(3): 227–268.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, Pil-Eon. 2002. A Study on the Efficient Operation of Agency System in Korean Government. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kyunghee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C. 1991. Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theory of Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, K., and Tuckel, P. 1985. The Utilization of Evaluation Research: A Case Analysis. Evaluation Review 9(3): 307–328.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. F. 1988. Evaluation Utilization Revisited. In Evaluation utilization (New directions for evaluation, No. 39, pp. 7?19), edited by J. A. McLaughlin, L. J. Weber, R. W. Covert, and R. B. Ingle. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. I. 1947. Multiple Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torres, R. T., and Preskill, H. 2001. Evaluation and Organizational Learning: Past, Present, and Future. American Journal of Evaluation 22(3): 387–395.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull, B. 1999. The Mediating Effect of Participation Efficacy on Evaluation Use. Evaluation and Program Planning 22(2): 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., and Birkeland, S. 2005. An Alternate Route to Policy Influence: How Evaluations Affect D.A.R.E. American Journal of Evaluation 26(1): 12–30.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Seung Hyun. 2008. Current State and Tasks of Governmental Agency Evaluation Use: Focusing on Executive Agency Evaluation in Korea. Korean Policy Studies Review 17(3): 95–130.
   Google Scholar