A Case Study of the Budgetary Politics of the Prime Minister during the Coalition Government of South Korea

References

• Baumgartner, F. R. & B. D. Jones. 1991. Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53: 1044–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R. & B. D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calista, Donald J. (ed.). 1986. Bureaucratic and Governmental Reform (Public Policy Studies Volume 9). Connecticut and London: Jai Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R. 1976. Administrative Reform and Politics of Reform. PAR, 20(4), 436–445.
   Google Scholar
• Hawker, G. 1981. Who’s master, Who’s servant?: Reforming Bureaucracy. London: George Allen and Urwin.
   Google Scholar
• Knott, J. H. and G. J. Miller. 1987. Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of Institutional choice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• LeLoup, L. T. 1988. From Microbudgeting to Macrobudgeting: Evolution in Theory and Practice. Irene Rubin (ed.), New Directions in Budget Theory, (pp. 19–42). Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebert, R. J. 1974. Municipal Functions, Structure, and Expenditures: A Reanalysis of Recent Research. Social Science Quarterly, 54: 765–783.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. and J. Olsen. 1983. Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government. APSR, 77, 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A., Jr. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I., ed. 1988. New Directions in Budget Theory. Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I., ed. 1999. Understanding the Role of Conflict in Budgeting. In Handbook of Government Budgeting, Roy T. Meyers (ed.), (pp. 30–52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I., ed. 1997. Budgeting: Theory and Concepts. In Public Budgeting and Finance, 4th edition, Robert Golembiewski and Jack Rabin (eds.), (pp. 185–201). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I., ed. 2004. The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing, 4th edition. New York, NY: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1993. Reorganizing Public Organization: Alternatives, Objectives and the Evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(4), 457–486.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, M. B. 1984. The Politics of Bureaucratic Reform. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. 1981. The Goals of Reorganization: A Framework for Analysis, Administration and Society, 12, 471–500.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. 1988. An Inquiry into the Possibility of a Budgetary Theory, Irene Rubin (ed.), New Directions in Budget Theory, (pp. 59–69). Albany: State Univ. of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, H. 1980. Politics, Position and Power: The Dynamics of Federal Organization. New York, NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• True, J. L. 1995. Is the National Budget Controllable? Public Budgeting and Finance, 15(2): 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• True, J. L. 1999. Attention, Inertia and Equity in the Social Security Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4): 571–596.
   Google Scholar
• True, J. L. 2000. Avalanches and Incrementalism: Making Policy and Budgets in the United States. American Review of Public Administration, 30(1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• True, J. L., B. D. Jones, & F. R. Baumgartner. 1999. Punctuated-Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking. In P. A. Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, 97–115. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1974. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. 1988. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.
   Google Scholar