The Adoption of State Growth Management Regulation (SGMR): Regarding Institutional Analysis And Development (IAD) Framework and Event History Analysis

References

• Anthony, J. 2000. The Impacts of State Growth Management Regulations on Housing Prices and Housing Affordability in Florida. PhD Thesis, Florida State University.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. 2001. The Impact of Growth Management Regulations on Housing Prices. Policy Brief 2(April): 1–8
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. 2004. Do State Growth Management Regulations Reduce Sprawl? Urban Affairs Review 39 (3):376–397.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. 2006. State Growth Management and Housing Prices. Social Science Quarterly 87 (1): 122–141.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, F, and W. Berry. 1990. State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis. The American Political Science Review 84 (2): 395–415.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., E. J. Ringquist, R. C. Fording, and R. L. Hanson. 1998. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–93. American Journal of Political Science 42 (1):327–348.
   Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., and B. S. Jones. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., D. Listokin, and C. C. Galley. 2000. Smart Growth: More Than a Ghost of Urban Policy Past, Less Than a Bold New Horizon. Housing Policy Debate 11 (4):821–879.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, R. W., G. Lowenstein, W. R. Dolphin, C. C. Galley, A. Downs, S. Seskin, K. Gray Still, and T. Moore. 2002. Costs of Sprawl 2000 (Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 74). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, J. I. 2002. The Impacts of State Growth Management Programmes: A Comparative Analysis. Urban Studies 39(11): 1959–1982.
   Google Scholar
• Collie, M. P. 1984. Voting Behavior in Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 9:3–50.
   Google Scholar
• DeGrove, J. M. 2005. Planning Policy and Politics: Smart Growth and the States. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institutue of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 2001. An Approach to Analyzing the Impacts of “Smart Growth” upon Economic Development. Economic Development Review 17 (4):9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 2002. Have Housing Prices Risen Faster in Portland Than Elsewhere? Housing Policy Debate 13 (1):7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 2004. Growth Management, Smart Growth, and Affordable Housing. In Growth Management and Affordable Housing: Do They Conflict? Edited by A. Downs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 2005. Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It. Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (4):367–378.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and M. P. Allen. 1976. Partisan Differences on Environmental Issues: A Congressional Roll-Call Analysis. The Western Political Quarterly 29 (3):384–397.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., C. Xiao, and A. M. McCright. 2001. Politics and Environment in America: Partisan and Ideological Cleavages in Public Support for Environmentalism. Environmental Politics 10 (4):23–48.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, M. 1981. The Impact of Growth Control Regulations on Housing Price in California. Journal of the American Real Estate and Urban Economics Assocaiton 8:115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 1994. The Political Economy of Growth Management. American Politics Research 22 (2):208–220.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2004. Politics, Institutions and Local Land-use Regulation. Urban Studies 41(2): 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C. 2007. Rational Choice and Regional Governance. Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1):47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., A. F. Tavares, and M. Lubell. 2008. Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation. Policy Studies Journal 36 (3):461–480.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, J., and P. Downing. 1988. Patterns of Impact Fees Use. In Development Impact Fees. Edited by A. C. Nelson. Chicago, IL; Washington, D.C.: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, D. E. 1992. Eight State-Sponsored Growth Management Programs: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association 58 (4):425–439.
   Google Scholar
• Glickfeld, M., and N. Levine. 1992. Regional Growth … Local Reaction: The Enactment and Effects of Local Growth Control and Management Measure in California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T. E. 2002. Changes in Legislative Support for Governor’s Program over Time. Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G.. 1968. The Tragedy of the Commons. Science 162:1243–1248.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, S. E., and S, B. Laska. 1992. The Changing Face of the Environmental Coalition: A Research Note. Environment and Behavior 24 (1):134–144.
   Google Scholar
• Howell-Moroney, M. 2007. Studying the Effects of the Intensity of U.S. State Growth Management Approaches on Land Development Outcomes. Urban Studies 44 (11):2163–2178.
   Google Scholar
• Howell-Moroney, M. 2008. A Mixed Method Look at State Growth Management Policy. The American Review of Public Administration 38 (3):339–361.
   Google Scholar
• Kamieniecki, S. 1995. Political Parties and Environmental Policy. In Environmental Politics and Policy: Theories and Evidence. Edited by J. P. Lester. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, I. S., and R. C. Feiock. 2006. Implementation of Growth Management Policy in Florida Cities: Zoning Approval and Regulatory Policy Enforcement. International Review of Public Administration 11 (1):85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. D. 1995. Managing Community Growth. Newport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Knaap, G. 1985. The Price Effects of Regional Land Use Controls in Oregon: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. Review of Regional Studies 18:37–45.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. 2006. Collaboration for Sustainability? A Framework for Analyzing Government Impacts in Collaborative-Environmental Management. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 2 (1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. D. 1986. Land Regulation and the Price of New Housing Lessons from Three California Cities. Journal of the American Planning Association 52 (1):9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. D. 1992. Do Growth Controls Work? A New Assessment. Journal of the American Planning Association 58:489–508.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., R. C. Feiock, and E. Ramirez. 2005. Political Institutions and Conservation by Local Governments. Urban Affairs Review 40 (6):706–729.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., M. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 46 (1):148–163
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J., and P. de Leon. 2001. Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11(3):327–352.
   Google Scholar
• Morehouse, S. M. 1996. Legislative Party Voting for the Governor’s Program. Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(3): 359–381.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, P, and R. Carson. 1991. Growth Controls: Policy Analysis for the Second Generation. Policy Science 24: 127–152.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C. 1992. Preserving Prime Farmlands in the Face of Urbanization. Journal of the American Planning Association 58:467–488.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., and J. B. Duncan. 1995. Growth Management Principles and Practices. Chicago, IL; Washington, D.C.: Planners Press, American Planning Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. C., R. Pendall, C. J. Dawkins, and G. J. Knaap. 2002. The Link Between Growth Management and Housing Affordability: The Academic Evidence. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1998. A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. The American Political Science Review 92 (1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2007. Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. In Theories of the Policy Process. Edited by P. A. Sabatier. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quigley, J. M., and L. A. Rosenthal. 2005. The Effects of Land Use Regulation on the Price of Housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn? Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 8 (1):69–137.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, L. A. 1989. Urban land supply: Natural and contrived restrictions. Journal of Urban Economics 25 (3):325–345.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, S. R. 1980. The Effects of Growth Control on Residential Development. In Management and Control of Growth. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sorens, J. 2004. Explaining Regional Ideological Differences. Paper prepared for delivery at New England Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Portsmouth, N.H.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 1987. The Possiblity of Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wassmer, R. W., and E. L. Lascher, Jr. 2006. Who Supports Local Growth and Regional Planning to Deal with Its Consequences? Urban Affairs Review 41 (5):621–645.
   Google Scholar
• Weitz, J. 1997. Concurrency: Evolution and Impacts of an Infrastructure and Growth Management Policy. Public Works Management 2:51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zorn, P. M., D. E. Hansen, and S. I. Schwartz. 1986. Mitigating the Price Effects of Growth Control: A Case Study of Davis, California. Land Economics 62 (1):46–57
   Google Scholar
• Jung-Won Park is a doctoral student of public administration and policy at Florida State University. His research interests focus on public policy analysis, particularly in the areas of public health policy.
   Google Scholar