Performance movement at a crossroads: information, accountability and learning

References

• Bouckaert, Geert, & Peters, B. G. (2002). Performance measurement and management: The Achilles’ heel in administrative modernization. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 359–362.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, R. (2009). Performance reporting: Insights from international practice. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Comfort, L. (2007). Crisis management in hindsight: Cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Administration Review, 67(6) (Special Issue on Administrative Failure in the Wake of Hurricane Katrina, December), 189–197.
   Google Scholar
• Curristine, T. (2005). Government performance: Lessons and challenges. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(1), 127–151.
   Google Scholar
• Curristine, T. (Ed.). (2007). Performance budgeting in OECD countries [online]. OECD. Retrieved from http://www.bmf.gv.at/Budget/Haushaltsrechtsreform/Literatur/OECD_Studie_Performance_Budgeting.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curristine, T. (2008). Sequencing and pacing of performance reforms [online]. Draft report of meeting of the OECD Network on Performance & Results held in Paris on 27–28 October 2008. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/21/14/42188165.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, E., Staes, P., & Prorok, T. (2006). CAF works: Better service for the citizens by using CAF [online]. Vienna: Austrian Federal Chancellery, Directorate General III – Civil Service and Administrative Reform. Retrieved from http://www.eipa.eu/CAF/Articles/CAFworks_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 376–417.
   Google Scholar
• GAO (US Government Accountability Office). (1997). Performance budgeting: Past initiatives offer insights for GPRA implementation [online]. Washington, DC: GAO AIMD-97-46 (27 March). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/archive/1997/ai97046.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GAO (US Government Accountability Office). (2004a). Results-oriented government: GPRA has established a solid foundation for achieving greater results [online]. Washington, DC: GAO-04-38 (March). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0438.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GAO (US Government Accountability Office). (2004b). Performance budgeting: Observations on the use of OMB’s Program Assessment Rating Tool for the FY 2004 budget [online]. Washington, DC: GAO-04-174 (January). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04174.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GAO (US Government Accountability Office). (2006). Performance budgeting: PART focuses attention on program performance, but more can be done to engage Congress [online]. Washington, DC: GAO-06-28 (October 2005). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0628.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GAO (US Government Accountability Office). (2008a). Government performance: Lessons learned for the next administration on using performance information to improve results. Washington, DC: GAO-08-1026T (24 July). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d081026t.pdf
   Google Scholar
• GAO (US Government Accountability Office). (2008b). Government performance: 2007 federal managers survey on performance and management issues. An e-supplement to GAO-08-1026T. Washington, [online]. DC: GAO-08-1036SP (July 2008). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/gao-08-1036sp/q16n.html
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, J. B. (2008). Implementing OMB’s program assessment rating tool. In F. S. Redburn, R. J. Shea, & T. F. Buss (Eds.), Performance management and budgeting: How governments can learn from experience (pp. 21–48). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H., Morley, E., Rossman, S., & Wholey, J. (2003). How federal programs use outcome information [online]. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government. Retrieved from http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/how-federal-programs-use-outcome-information-opportunities-federal-managers
   Google Scholar
• Joyce, P. (2011). The Obama Administration and PBB: Building on the legacy of federal performance-informed budgeting? Public Administration Review, 71(3), 356–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korten, D. (1980). Community organization and rural development. Public Administration Review, 40(5), 480–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, J., & Casamayou, M. (2009). Organizational learning at NASA: The Challenger and the Columbia accidents. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metzenbaum, S. (2009). Performance recommendations for the new administration. Arlington, VA: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M., & Moore, P. (2000). The lessons we (don’t) learn: Counterfactual thinking and organizational accountability after a close call. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), 737–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. (2008). The dynamics of performance management. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D., & Lavertu, S. (2012). Does involvement in performance management routines encourage performance information use? Evaluating GPRA and PART. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 593–602.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2013). Strengthening budget institutions in OECD countries: Results of the 2012 OECD budget practices and procedures survey [online]. Draft presentation at the 34th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials, OECD Conference Centre, Paris, 3–4 June 2013. Retrieved from GOV-PGC-SBO(2013)5-Metam~1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2007–2008). Budget Practices and Procedures Database [online]. Directorate for Public Governance and Territorial Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3746,en_2649_34119_2494461_1_1_1_1,00.html
   Google Scholar
• Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, P. L. (2009). Performance budgeting: Sustaining momentum for reform. Testimony delivered before the Senate Budget Committee, 20 October 2009. Retrieved from http://www.budget.senate.gov/democratic/public/?a=Files.Serve&File_id=33aa9107-dec2-49ac-90e1-0eb60859da0e
   Google Scholar
• Radin, B. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (2013). The metamorphoses of performance budgeting [online]. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Budget Officials, OECD Conference Centre, Paris, 3–4 June 2013. Retrieved from GOV-PGC-SBO(2013)5-Metam~1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Staes, P., Thijs, N., Stoffels, A., & Geldof, S. (2011). Five years of CAF 2006: From adolescence to maturity –what next? [online]. European (EIPA) CAF Resource Centre, European Insitute of Public Administration. Retrieved from http://www.eipa.eu/files/File/CAF/CAF%20Study%202011_Research%20Report_v6.pdf
   Google Scholar