Institutional work and accountability in public–private partnerships

References

• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. (2002). The structuration of legitimate performance measures and management: day-to-day contests of accountability in a UK restaurant chain. Management Accounting Research, 13(2), 151–171.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, N. M., & Solomon, J. (2008). Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(7), 885–906.
   Google Scholar
• Carmel, E., & Papadopoulos, T. (2003). The new governance of social security in the UK. In J. Millar (Ed.), Understanding social security (pp. 31–52). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T. (2007). Governance and accountability: A shift in conceptualisation. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forrer, J., Kee, J. E., Newcomer, K. E., & Boyer, E. (2010). Public–private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 475–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. E., Babb, M., & Alpaslan, C. M. (2008). Institutional field dynamics and the competition between institutional logics. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 40–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hietaniemi, M., & Ritola, S. (Eds.). (2007). The Finnish pension system. Finnish Centre for Pensions Handbooks. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, G., & Greve, C. (Eds.). (2005). The challenge of public–private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, J.-E., & Sorsa, V.-P. (2010). Pension governance in Finland: A case study on public and private logics of governance in pension provision. Finnish Centre for Pensions Reports 2010:2. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio, I. (2005). Vakuutuksenottajan Oikeudet Työeläkevakuutusyhtiön Varallisuuteen. Helsinki: Suomen vakuutusalan koulutus ja kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, O. (2006). Pensions and pension funds in the making of a nation-state and a national economy: The case of Finland. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, O. (2007). Finland: Labor markets against politics. In E. M. Immergut, K. M. Anderson, & I. Schulze (Eds.), The handbook of west European pension politics (pp. 248–296). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, O., Lundberg, U., & Ploug, N. (2010). Three routes to pension reform: Politics and institutions in reforming pensions in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. Social Policy & Administration, 44(3), 265–284.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B. (2008). Power, institutions and organizations. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 170–197). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The sage handbook of organization studies(2nd ed., pp. 215—254). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, D., & Scully, M. (2007). The institutional entrepreneur as modern prince: The strategic face of power in contested fields. Organization Studies, 28(7), 971–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 349–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazza, C., & Pedersen, J. S. (2004). From press to E-media? The transformation of an organizational field. Organization Studies, 25(6), 875–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2000a). Comparing accountability in the public and private sectors. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 59(1), 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2000b). ‘Accountability’: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutt, P. C., & Backoff, R. W. (1992). Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: A handbook for leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2007). ‘Healing the scars of history’: Projects, skills and field strategies in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(7), 1101–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pongsiri, N. (2002). Regulation and public–private partnerships. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15(6), 487–495.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33(3), 479–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rautiainen, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2012). Institutional logics and responses to performance measurement systems. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(2), 164–188.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaoul, J., Stafford, A., & Stapleton, P. (2012). Accountability and corporate governance of public private partnerships. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(3), 213–229.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2005). Public–private partnerships and hybridity. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 347–370). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorsa, V.-P. (2011). Pension fund capitalism in Europe: Institutional organisation and governance of Finnish pension insurance companies. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sorsa, V.-P., & Johanson, J.-E. (2011). Hallinnolliset Jännitteet Julkisyksityisten Eläkejärjestelmien Uudistumiskyvyn Lähteenä [Administrative tensions as a source for reform capacity in public–private pension systems]. Hallinnon Tutkimus [Administrative Studies Journal], 30(3), 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(1), 14–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ham, H., & Koppenjan, J. (2001). Building public–private partnerships: Assessing and managing risks in port development. Public Management Review, 3(4), 593–616.
   Google Scholar