423
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Is trust in government a short-term strategic value or a long-term democratic value? A case study of three Nordic countries and three East Asian Nations

Pages 273-286 | Received 05 Mar 2015, Accepted 24 Apr 2015, Published online: 21 Sep 2015

References

  • Abramson, P. R. (1983). Political attitudes in America: Formation and change. San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Abramson, P. R., & Finifter, A. W. (1981). On the meaning of political trust: New evidence from items introduced in 1978. American Journal of Political Science, 25(2), 297–307.
  • Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2001). Winners, losers, and attitudes about government in contemporary democracies. International Political Science Review, 22(4), 321–338.
  • Askvik, S. (2010). The dynamics of political trust in South Africa, 1995–2006. Politikon, 37(1), 25–44.
  • Avery, J. M. (2007). Race, partisanship, and political trust following Bush versus Gore. Political Behavior, 29, 327–342.
  • Baek, M., & Kestila, E. (2008). Social capital and political trust in Finland: An individual-level assessment. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(2), 171–194.
  • Bianco, W. T. (1994). Trust: Representatives and constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Bjornskov, C. (2006). Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice, 130, 1–21.
  • Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (Eds.). (1998). Trust and governance. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999–1023.
  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson and Company.
  • Chanley, V. A., Thomas, R., & Rahn, W. M. (2000). The origin and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 237–257.
  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.
  • Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. American Political Science Review, 68, 973–988.
  • Citrin, J., & Green, D. P. (1986). Presidential leadership and the resurgence of trust in government. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 143–53.
  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Coleman, K. M. & Davis, C. L. (1976). The structural context of politics and dimensions of regime performance: Their importance for the comparative study of political efficacy. Comparative Political Studies, 9, 189–206.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Converse, P. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In A. Campbell & P. E. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 263–337). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
  • Craig, S. C. (1980). The mobilization of political discontent. Political Behavior, 43, 189–209.
  • Craig, S. G. (1993). The malevolent leaders. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435–457.
  • Elazar, D. (1972). American Federalism: A view from the States. New York, NY: Crowell.
  • Fisher, J., Van Heerde, J., & Tucker, A. (2010). Does one trust judgment fit all? Linking theory and empirics. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 12, 161–188.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Belmont, MA: Dorsey.
  • Gershtenson, J., Ladewig, J., & Plane, D. L. (2006). Parties, institutional control, and trust in government. Social Science Quarterly, 87(4), 882–902.
  • Hall, P. A. (1999). Social capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 417–461.
  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(3), 295–304.
  • Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.
  • Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hetherington, M. J., & Rudolph, T. J. (2008). Priming, performance, and the dynamics of political trust. The Journal of Politics, 70(2), 498–512.
  • Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (1995). Congress as public enemy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hooghe, M. (2011). Why there is basically only one form of political trust. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13, 269–275.
  • House, P. J., Hanges, M., Javidan, P. W., & Dorfman, V. G. (2004). GLOBE associates leadership, culture and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Iyengar, S. (1980). Subjective political efficacy as a measure of diffuse support. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 249–256.
  • Kaase, M. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European. Politics, 22(3), 1–21.
  • Keele, L. (2007). Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 41–254.
  • Keele, L. (2005). The authorities really do matter: Party control and trust in government. Journal of Politics, 67, 445–456.
  • Knack, S. (2002). Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the States. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 772–785.
  • Knack, S., & Keeper, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 35–78.
  • La Porta, R. F., Lopez-de-Silanes, A. S., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Trust in large organizations. American Economic Review, 87, 333–338.
  • Levi, M. (1996). Social and unsocial capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam's making democracy work. Politics and Society, 24(1), 45–55.
  • Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 267–291.
  • McAllister, I. (1999). The economic performance of governments. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp.188–203). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Meer, T. (2010). In what we trust? A multi-level study into trust in parliament as an evaluation of state characteristics. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 517–536.
  • Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972.
  • Miller, A., & Borrelli, S. (1991). Confidence in government during the 1980s. American Political Science Review, 68(4), 147–173.
  • Miller, A., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government. A comparison of Norway, Sweden, and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357–386.
  • Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust?: Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30–62.
  • Muller, E. N., Jukam, T. O., & Seligson, M. (1982). Diffuse political support and antisystem political behavior: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 240–264.
  • Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214.
  • Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture, or performance? In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp.52–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Newton, K., & Zmerli, S. (2011). Three forms of trust and their association. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 169–200.
  • Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 national election. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407–1413.
  • Norris, P. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Nye, Jr. J., Zelikow, P., & King, D. (Eds.). (1997). Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation, and social rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277.
  • Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.). (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Pye, L. W. (1999). Civility, social capital, and civil society: Three powerful concepts for explaining Asia. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29(4), 763–782.
  • Rothstein, B. (2001). Social capital in the social democratic welfare state. Politics and Society, 29(2), 207–241.
  • Schoon, I., & Cheng, H. (2011). Determinants of political trust: A lifetime learning model. Developmental Psychology, 47(3), 619–631.
  • Seligson, M. A. (1980). A problem-solving approach to measuring political efficacy. Social Science Quarterly, 60(75–98), 630–642.
  • Torpe, L. (2003). Social capital in Denmark: A deviant case? Scandinavian Political Studies, 26, 27–48.
  • Ulbig, S. G. (2007). Gendering municipal government: Female descriptive representation and feelings of political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1106–1123.
  • Uslaner, E. (2002). Moral foundation of trust. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Warren, M. E. (Ed.). (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yamagishi, T., Cook, K. S., & Watabe, M. (1998). Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 165–194.
  • Zak, P. J. & Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.