Performance-oriented managerial practices and job attitude in public organizations

References

• Agho, A. O., Mueller, C. W., & Price, J. L. (1993). Determinants of employee job satisfaction: An empirical test of a causal model. Human Relations, 46, 1007–1027.10.1177/001872679304600806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, G. P., Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1988). Compensation and incentives: Practices vs. theory. Journal of Finance, 43, 593–616.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, J. N. (1990). Perceptions of public versus private sector personnel and informal red tape: Their impact on motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 20, 7–28.10.1177/027507409002000102
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. (2006). Motivation crowding and the federal civil servant: Evidence from the US Internal Revenue Service. International Public Management Journal, 9, 3–23.10.1080/10967490600625191
   Google Scholar
• Bokemeier, J. L., & Lacy, W. B. (1987). Job values, rewards, and work conditions as factors in job satisfaction among men and women. Sociological Quarterly, 28, 189–204.10.1111/tsq.1987.28.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., Reed, P. N., & Scott, P. (1992). Red tape and task delays in public and private organizations. Administration and Society, 24, 290–322.10.1177/009539979202400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. I. (1975). Red-tape and the service ethic. Administration and Society, 6, 423–444.10.1177/009539977500600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B. J., & Staw, B. M. (1975). Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 599–605.10.1037/h0077100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113–120.10.1037/h0032355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
   Google Scholar
• Deckop, J. R., & Cirka, C. C. (2000). The risk and reward of a double-edgedsword: Effects of a merit payprogram on intrinsic motivation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 400–418.10.1177/0899764000293003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549–559.10.1111/puar.2000.60.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederer, F., & Manso, G. (2013). Is pay for performance detrimental to innovation? Management Science, 59, 1496–1513.10.1287/mnsc.1120.1683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153–1166.10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijkenaar, F. (2013). Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs. The European Journal of Health Economics, 14, 117–131.10.1007/s10198-011-0347-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson, M. C. (2002). Determinants of job satisfaction of municipal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 31, 343–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., Homberg, F., & Osterloh, M. (2013). Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service. Organization Studies, 34, 949–972.10.1177/0170840613483655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabris, G. T. (1986). Why merit pay plans are not working: A search for alternative pay plans in the public sector – a symposium part I. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 7, 1–8.10.1177/0734371X8600700101
   Google Scholar
• Gabris, G. T., & Ihrke, D. M. (1995). Improving employee acceptance toward performance appraisal and merit pay systems. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 20, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, W. (2008). Pay-for-performance: Linking employee pay to performance appraisal: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, L. R., & Frank, M. L. (2002). Organizational commitment across three sectors: Public, non-profit, and for-profit. Public Personnel Management, 31, 201–210.10.1177/009102600203100206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, A. H. (1983). Work and job satisfaction in the public sector. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D. J. (2000). Public-service motivation: A multivariate test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 713–728.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D. J. (2009). Motivating knights or knaves? Moving beyond performance–related pay for the public sector. Public Administration Review, 69, 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2004). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Igalens, J., & Roussel, P. (1999). A study of the relationships between compensation package, work motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1003–1025.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P. W. (1993). Pay for performance in the States. American Review of Public Administration, 23, 189–200.10.1177/027507409302300301
   Google Scholar
• Kalleberg, A. L. (1974). A causal approach to the measurement of inequality in job satisfaction. Social Science Research, 3, 299–322.10.1016/0049-089X(74)90002-7
   Google Scholar
• Karl, K. A., & Sutton, C. L. (1998). Job values in today’s workforce: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 27, 515–527.10.1177/009102609802700406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellough, J. E., & Selden, S. C. (1997). Pay-for-performance systems in state government: Perceptions of state agency personnel managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 17, 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Khojasteh, M. (1993). Motivating the private vs. public sector managers. Public Personnel Management, 22, 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, F., Cummings, M. C., & Jennings, M. K. (1964). The image of the federal survice. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2009). IT employee job satisfaction in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 1070–1097.10.1080/01900690903170303
   Google Scholar
• Kreft, I., & Leeuw, D. J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., & Greene, D. (1975). Truning play into work: Effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 479–486.10.1037/h0076484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the ‘overjustifcation’ hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.10.1037/h0035519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16, 677–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, M. J. (2000). Organizational commitment revisited in New Public Managment: Motivation, organizational culture, sector, and managerial level. Public Performance & Management Review, 24, 177–194.10.2307/3381267
   Google Scholar
• Mottaz, C. J. (1985). The relative importance of intrinic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction. Sociological Quarterly, 26, 365–385.10.1111/tsq.1985.26.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The normative model in decline? Public service motivation in the age of governance. In J. L. Perry, & A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 247–267). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Landuyt, N. (2008). Explaining turnover intention in state government: Examining the roles of gender, life cycle, and loyalty. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 28, 120–143.10.1177/0734371X08315771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstrom, J., Reif, W. E., & Monczka, R. M. (1976). Motivating the public employee: Fact vs. fiction. Public Personnel Management, 5, 67–72.10.1177/009102607600500108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notz, W. W. (1975). Work motivation and the negative effects of extrinsic rewards: A review with implications for theory and practice. American Psychologist, 30, 884–891.10.1037/0003-066X.30.9.884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. K., & Kingsley, G. A. (2000). Examining red tape in public and private organizations: Alternative explanations from a social psychological model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 779–800.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024291
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the Future? Performance-related pay, empirical research, and the perils of persistence. Public Administration Review, 69, 39–51.10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Mesch, D., & Paarlberg, L. (2006). Motivating employees in a new governance era: The performance paradigm revisited. Public Administration Review, 66, 505–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50, 367–373.10.2307/976618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1996). The values of business and federal government executives: More different than alike. Public Personnel Management, 25, 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review of Public Administration, 16, 288–302.10.1177/027507408201600402
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447–470.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276
   Google Scholar
• Slater, P. (1980). Wealth addiction. New York, NY: Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C. (2009). Crowding out intrinsic motivation? The role of performance-related pay. Paper presented at the 10th National Public Management Research Conference, Columbus, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Ting, Y. (1997). Determinants of job satisfaction of federal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 26, 313–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. M., & Meiksins, P. F. (1991). What do engineers want? Work values, job rewards, and job satisfaction. Science Technology, & Human Values, 16, 140–172.10.1177/016224399101600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector–benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 387–412.10.1093/jopart/mup009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissert, W. G., & Frederick, L. F. (2013). Pay for performance: Can it help improve nursing home quality? Public Administration Review, 73, S140–S151.10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmer, D. (1991). Serving the people or serving for pay: Reward preferences among government, hybrid sector, and business managers. Public Productivity & Management Review, 14, 369–383.10.2307/3380953
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Kassekert, A. (2010). Linking management reform with employee job satisfaction: Evidence from federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 413–436.10.1093/jopart/mup010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar