References
- Albright, E. A. (2011). Policy change and learning in response to external flood events in Hungary: An advocacy coalition approach. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 485–511.
- Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.
- Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74.
- Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
- Burton, P. (2006). Modernising the policy process: Making policy research more significant? Policy Studies, 27(3), 173–195.
- Char, N. L., & Csik, B. J. (1987). Nuclear power development: History and outlook. IAEA Bulletin, 29(3), 19–25.
- Checkel, J. T. (2006). Tracing causal mechanisms. International Studies Review, 8(2), 362–370.
- Cho, M. (2013, January 7). South Korea to expand nuclear energy despite growing safety fears. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/08/us-nuclear-korea-idUSBRE90704D20130108
- Collier, D. (2011). Understanding process tracing. PS: Political Science and Politics, 44(4), 823–830.
- Donga Ilbo. (2012, February 1). Appeal court orders the local government to open information on the procedure from application to being selected. Retrieved from http://news.donga.com/3/all/20120201/43712503/1
- Fischer, M. (2015). Institutions and coalitions in policy processes: A cross-sectoral comparison. Journal of Public Policy, 35(2), 245–268.
- Freedom House. (2013). Freedom in the world 2013: Democratic breakthroughs in the balance. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2013
- Hall, P. A. (2006). Systematic process analysis: When and how to use it. European Management Review, 3(1), 24–31.
- Harman, E. (1996). The national competition policy: A study of the policy process and network. Australian Journal of Political Science, 31(2), 205–223.
- Henry, A. D., Ingold, K., Nohrstedt, D., & Weilble, C. M. (2014). Policy change in comparative contexts. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 16(4), 299–312.
- Hong, S. (2011). Where is the nuclear nation going? Hopes and fears over nuclear energy in South Korea after the Fukushima disaster. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 5(3), 409–415.
- International Atomic Energy Agency. (2005). Global public opinion on nuclear issues and the IAEA: Final report from 18 countries. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/esswpaper/id_3a362.htm
- International Atomic Energy Agency. (2011). Nuclear power reactors in the world. Retrieved from http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/RDS2_web.pdf
- IPSOS Global Advisor. (2011). Global citizen reaction to the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster. Retrieved from http://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/ipsos-global-advisor-nuclear-power-june-2011.pdf
- Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 183–223). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- John, P. (2003). Is there life after policy streams, advocacy coalitions, and punctuations: Using evolutionary theory to explain policy change? Policy Studies Journal, 31(4), 481–498.
- Joskow, P. L., & Parsons, J. E. (2012). The future of nuclear power after Fukushima. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 1(2), 1–30.
- Jung, H. G., & Kim, H. K. (2009). Development of democratization movement in South Korea [Stanford Korea democracy project]. Retrieved from https://fsi.stanford.edu/publications/development_of_democratization_movement_in_south_korea
- Kay, A., & Baker, P. (2015). What can causal process tracing offer to policy studies? A review of the literature. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1), 1–21.
- Kihl, Y. W. (2005). Transforming Korean politics: Democracy, reform, and culture. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
- Kim, Y. (2012, March 8). 1 Year after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Donga Ilbo. Retrieved from http://news.donga.com/Issue/Top/3/all/20120308/44600544/1
- Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movement in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85.
- Korean Atomic Industrial Forum. (2011). Nuclear energy yearbook of 2011. Retrieved from http://www.kaif.or.kr
- Kriesi, H. (1995). The political opportunity structure of new social movements. In C. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The structure of political opportunities (pp. 167–198). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Leifeld, P., & Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 731–744.
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, & Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute. (2009). Energy sourced from the brain: 50 years of nuclear energy, 50 years of propensity. Seoul, Korea: MEST and KAERI.
- Ministry of Knowledge Economy. (2008). The first national energy plan: 2008–2030. Retrieved from http://www2.korea.kr/expdoc/viewDocument.req?id=12513&limit=15
- Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (Eds.). (2003). Coalition governments in western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Nelkin, D. (1979). Scientific knowledge, public policy, and democracy: A review essay. Science Communication, 1(1), 106–122.
- Nelkin, D., & Pollak, M. (1981). A pregnant pause: The European response to the Three Mile Island accident. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 365(1), 186–195.
- Nohrstedt, D. (2005). External shocks and policy change: Three Mile Island and Swedish nuclear energy policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1041–1059.
- Nohrstedt, D. (2009). Do advocacy coalitions matter? Crisis and change in Swedish nuclear energy policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 309–333.
- Nohrstedt, D. (2011). Shifting resources and venues producing policy change in contested subsystems: A case study of Swedish signals intelligence policy. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 461–484.
- Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. M. (2010). The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risks, Hazards, and Crisis in Public Policy, 1(2), 1–32.
- Nuclear Energy Institute. (2016). World nuclear generation and capacity. Retrieved from http://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/World-Statistics
- Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.
- Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2005, April). Innovations in the advocacy coalition framework. Paper presented at the 2005 American Society of Public Administration Conference, Milwaukee, WI.
- Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 189–220). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Saxer, C. J. (2002). From transition to power alteration: Democracy in South Korea, 1987–1997. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Schlager, E., & Blomquist, W. (1996). A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 651–672.
- Schneider, M., Froggatt, A., & Thomas, S. (2011). Nuclear power in a post-Fukushima world. Retrieved from http://www.worldwatch.org/nuclear-power-after-fukushima
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1947). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers.
- Sørensen, G. (2010). Democracy and democratization. In K. T. Leicht & J. C. Jenkins (Eds.), Handbook of politics (pp. 441–459). New York, NY: Springer.
- Squassoni, S. (2012). Global nuclear energy landscape after Fukushima. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved from http://csis.org/files/publication/120227_GlobalNuclearEnergyLandscape%20.pdf
- Sung, C., & Hong, S. (1999). Development process of nuclear power industry in a developing country: Korean experience and implications. Technovation, 19(5), 305–316.
- Sungkyunkwan Research Survey Center. (2003). Survey on attitudes toward nuclear power generation. Retrieved from http://www.kossda.or.kr/
- Van Waarden, F. (1992). Dimensions and types of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 29–52.
- Weible, C. M. (2005). Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: An advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Political Research Quarterly, 58(3), 461–476.
- Weible, C. M., Sabatier, P. A., & McQueen, K. (2009). Themes and variations: Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121–140.
- Wikdahl, C. (2008). Nuclear power in Sweden, Finland and Europe. Retrieved from http://www.wikdahl.se/res/CarlErik/nuclearpowerwikdahlfinal.pdf
- Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 75–94. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
- Yonhap News Agency. (2012, September 14). Government names two candidate sites for new nuclear plants. Retrieved from https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20120914002200320?section=search