260
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Innovative self-efficacy of municipal employees: empirical evidence from Russia’s Leningrad region

ORCID Icon
Pages 36-59 | Received 25 Apr 2018, Accepted 30 Jan 2019, Published online: 18 Feb 2019

References

  • Andersen, S. C., & Jakobsen, M. L. (2018). Political pressure, conformity pressure, and performance information as drivers of public sector innovation adoption. International Public Management Journal, 1–30. doi:10.1080/10967494.2018.1425227
  • Azur, M. J., Stuart, E. A., Frangakis, C., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work? International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(1), 40–49.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.
  • Barabashev, A., & Straussman, J. D. (2007). Public service reform in Russia, 1991–2006. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 373–382.
  • Belle, N. (2015). Leading to make a difference: A field experiment on the performance effects of transformational leadership, perceived social impact, and public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 109–136. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut033
  • Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(02), 395–415. doi:10.2307/1963526
  • Bhatti, Y., Olsen, A. L., & Pedersen, L. H. (2011). Administrative professionals and the diffusion of innovations: The case of citizen service centres. Public Administration, 89(2), 577–594.
  • Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 498–507.
  • Borins, S. (2001). Public management innovation: Toward a global perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 31(1), 5–21.
  • Büdenbender, M., & Zupan, D. (2017). The evolution of neoliberal urbanism in Moscow, 1992–2015. Antipode, 49(2), 294–313.
  • Bysted, R., & Hansen, J. R. (2013). Comparing public and private sector employees’ innovative behaviour: Understanding the role of job and organizational characteristics, job types, and subsectors. Public Management Review, 17(5), 698–717.
  • Campbell, J. W. (2014). Identification and performance management: An assessment of change-oriented behavior in public organizations. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 46–69. Retrieved from http://ppm.sagepub.com/content/44/1/46.abstract
  • Campbell, J. W. (2018a). Felt responsibility for change in public organizations: General and sector-specific paths. Public Management Review, 20(2), 232–253.
  • Campbell, J. W. (2018b). Workgroup accord and change-oriented behavior in public service organizations: Mediating and contextual factors. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–17. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/workgroup-accord-and-changeoriented-behavior-in-public-service-organizations-mediating-and-contextual-factors/E3E52B3D2F351CFDFD3EF25F8E08BAE5. doi:10.1017/jmo.2018.42
  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
  • De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
  • Diamond, L. J. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21–35. Retrieved from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/17195
  • Eddings, W., & Marchenko, Y. (2012). Diagnostics for multiple imputation in Stata. Stata Journal, 12(3), 353–367. Retrieved from http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=st0263http://www.stata-journal.com/sjpdf.html?article=st0263
  • Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10(3), 329–333.
  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.
  • Ermasova, N., & Mokeev, M. (2016). Local governments in Russia. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1–6). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155–187. Retrieved from http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/1/155.abstract
  • Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 250–269.
  • Gans-Morse, J., Kalgin, A. S., Klimenko, A. V., & Yakovlev, A. A. (2017). Motivations for public service in corrupt states: Evidence from Post-Soviet Russia. (Higher School of Economics Research Paper No. WP BRP 13/PSP/2017).
  • Geys, B., & Sørensen, R. J. (2018). Never change a winning policy? Public sector performance and politicians’ preferences for reforms. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 206–216.
  • Grant, A. M., & Berg, J. M. (2011). Prosocial motivation at work: When, why, and how making a difference makes a difference. In M. S. Gretchen & S. C. Kim (Eds.), The oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 27–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Grant, A. M., & Rothbard, N. P. (2013). When in doubt, seize the day? Security values, prosocial values, and proactivity under ambiguity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 810–819.
  • Gregory, P. R. C. (1989). Soviet bureaucratic behaviour: Khozyaistvenniki and apparatchiki. Soviet Studies, 41(4), 511–525. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/152534
  • Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative innovation: A viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.
  • Ivanova, N. L., & Dubinenkova, E. N. (2014). Introduction of innovations in the public administration: Problems and factors (ВНЕДРЕНИЕ ИННОВАЦИЙ В СФЕРЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОГО УПРАВЛЕНИЯ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ И ФАКТОРЫ). Вопросы управления, 4(2). Retrieved from http://vestnik.uapa.ru/ru/issue/2014/04/02/
  • Jäkel, T., & Borshchevskiy, G. A. (2018). Who wants to work in bureaucracy? Career intentions of post-millennial students. Teaching Public Administration.doi:10.1177/0144739418806553
  • Jakobsen, M., & Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 3–30.
  • Jakobson, L. I. (2001). Public management in Russia: Changes and inertia. International Public Management Journal, 4(1), 27–48. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109674940100040X
  • Jakobson, L. I., Rudnik, B., & Toepler, S. (2018). From liberal to conservative: Shifting cultural policy regimes in Post-Soviet Russia. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 24(3), 297–314.
  • James, O., Jilke, S. R., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (Eds.). (2017). Experiments in public management research: Challenges and contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • James, O., & John, P. (2007). Public management at the ballot box: Performance information and electoral support for incumbent english local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–580.
  • Karacharovskiy, V., Shkaratan, O., & Yastrebov, G. (2016). Towards a new russian work culture: Can western companies and expatriates change Russian Society? Stuttgart: ibidem.
  • Kjeldsen, A. M., & Jacobsen, C. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899–926. Retrieved from http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/4/899.abstract
  • Kornai, J. (1992). The socialist system: The political economy of communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kozina, E. V. (2018). Some issues of remuneration of municipal employees. Муниципалитет: экономика и управление, 23(2). Retrieved from http://municipal.uapa.ru/en/issue/2018/02/15/
  • Leksin, I. (2016). Institutional foundations of local self-government, Russia. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1–8). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Levada-Center. (2018). Institutional trust. Retrieved from https://www.levada.ru/en/2018/10/22/institutional-trust-4/.
  • Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236–263. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597816304794
  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. Retrieved from http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  • March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993 [1958]). Organizations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Marinova, S. V., Peng, C., Lorinkova, N., Van Dyne, L., & Chiaburu, D. (2015). Change-oriented behavior: A meta-analysis of individual and job design predictors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 104–120. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879115000135
  • Meier, K. J., Favero, N., & Zhu, L. (2015). Performance gaps and managerial decisions: A bayesian decision theory of managerial action. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1221–1246.
  • Meijer, A. J. (2014). From hero-innovators to distributed heroism: An in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 16(2), 199–216.
  • Mersianova, I., Jakobson, L., & Krasnopolskaya, I. (2015). Giving in Russia: The difficult shaping of the new nonprofit regime. In P. Wiepking, & F. Handy (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy (249–266). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2017). How leadership and public service motivation Enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81.
  • Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 738–770.
  • Moon, M. J., & Bretschneiber, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273–292.
  • Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/257011
  • Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.
  • Nikitina, A. S. (2013). The specifics of innovation activities of civil servants: The sociological aspect (Специфика инновационной деятельности современных государственных служащих: социологический аспект). Экономика, государство, общество, 3. Retrieved from http://ego.uapa.ru/en/issue/2013/03/02/
  • Obolonskii, A., & Barabashev, A. (2014). How to clean out the augean stable of our bureaucracy. Russian Politics & Law, 52(2), 77–94.
  • Owen, C., & Bindman, E. (2018). Civic participation in a hybrid regime: Limited pluralism in policymaking and delivery in contemporary Russia. Government and Opposition, 54(1), 98–120. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/article/civic-participation-in-a-hybrid-regime-limited-pluralism-in-policymaking-and-delivery-in-contemporary-russia/71B17BBDEB69FA0D5F2B836481E7CA8C
  • Pedersen, M. J., Favero, N., Nielsen, V. L., & Meier, K. J. (2017). Public management on the ground: Clustering managers based on their behavior. International Public Management Journal, 1–41. doi:10.1080/10967494.2017.1396273
  • Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1181620
  • Perry, J. L., & Vandenabeele, W. (2015). Public service motivation research: Achievements, challenges, and future directions. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 692–699.
  • Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373. Retrieved from https://publicadministrationreview.org/the-motivational-bases-of-public-service/
  • Petrov, N., Lipman, M., & Hale, H. E. (2014). Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia from Putin to Putin. Post-Soviet Affairs, 30(1), 1–26.
  • Ramazanov, K. (2017). Public service in Russia. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 1–7). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations (1 ed.). New York: Free Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
  • Salge, T. O. (2011). A behavioral model of innovative search: Evidence from public hospital services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(1), 181–210. Retrieved from http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/1/181.abstract
  • Sanina, A., & Kutergina, E. (2017). What civil servants want: Russian civil servants explain their work priorities. Retrieved from Date https://iq.hse.ru/en/news/207173447.html
  • Sapat, A. (2004). Devolution and innovation: The adoption of state environmental policy innovations by administrative agencies. Public Administration Review, 64(2), 141–151.
  • Sapsford, R., & Abbott, P. (2006). Trust, confidence and social environment in post-communist societies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 39(1), 59–71. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967067X05000668
  • Shu, W., & Feeney, M. K. (2014). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration. Retrieved from http://arp.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/10/16/0275074014553462.abstract. doi:10.1177/0275074014553462
  • Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256865
  • StataCorp LP. (2013). Stata multiple imputation reference manual release 13. College Station, Texas: Stata Press.
  • Styrin, E., & Kostyrko, A. (2015). Implementing smart services in Moscow: The integrated mobile platform. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 225–241). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Teodoro, M. P. (2009). Bureaucratic job mobility and the diffusion of innovations. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 175–189.
  • Teodoro, M. P. (2011). Bureaucratic ambition: Careers, motives, and the innovative administrator. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. Retrieved from http://amj.aom.org/content/45/6/1137.abstract
  • Tishchenko, E. (2012). Composition of stimulating elements and their correlation in the payment of civil servants’ work in the Russian Federation and foreign countries. Public Administration Issues, 6(4), 160–168. Retrieved from https://vgmu.hse.ru/en/2012–4/70744248.html
  • UITP. (2016). Moscow (re)opens its central circle railway line. Retrieved from https://www.uitp.org/news/moscow-reopens-its-central-circle-railway-line
  • Vasilyeva, E. A., & Borisov, A. F. (2017). Transformation of the values of regional public employees under administrative reform: Sociological analysis (ТРАНСФОРМАЦИЯ ЦЕННОСТЕЙ РЕГИОНАЛЬНЫХ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫХ СЛУЖАЩИХ В УСЛОВИЯХ АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЙ РЕФОРМЫ: СОЦИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ). Государственное управление. Электронный вестник, 63, 396–413.
  • Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American States. American Political Science Review, 63(03), 880–899.
  • Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and external antecedents of process innovation: A review and extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44.
  • Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367–386. Retrieved from http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/2/367.abstract
  • Zemtsov, S., Pavlov, P., Sorokina, A., Bortnik, I., & Ivanova, O. (2015). Становление Инновационных Кластеров в России: Итоги Первых Лет Поддержки (Formation of Innovation Clusters in Russia: Results of the First Years of Support). Innovations, 7. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2654833
  • Zhuravleva, T. A. (2017). The system of remuneration and motivation of public civil servants: A review of international practice. Vestnik, 64. Retrieved from http://ee-journal.spa.msu.ru/vestnik/item/64_2017zhuravleva.htm

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.