Can communication by the government improve trust and reduce risk perception?

References

• Bronfman, N. C., Vázquez, E. L., & Dorantes, G. (2009). An empirical study for the direct and indirect links between trust in regulatory institutions and acceptability of hazards. Safety Science, 47(5), 686–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covello, V., Winterfeldt, V., & Slovic, P. (1986). Risk communication: A review of the literature. Risk Abstracts, 3(4), 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich, G. (1999). The attribution of social trust. In G. Cvetkovich & R. Lofstedt (Eds.), Social trust and the management of risk (pp. 53–61). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. I., & Darst, R. G. (2006). Meeting the challenge of permanent nuclear waste disposal in an expanding Europe: Transparency, trust and democracy. Environmental Politics, 15(4), 610–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T., & Cvetkovich, G. (1995). Social trust: Toward a cosmopolitan society. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, T., & Siegrist, M. (2006). Morality information, performance information, and the distinction between trust and confidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 383–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterling, D., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). The dilemma of siting a high-level nuclear waste repository. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A. M. (1999) Does the invisible hand need a transparency glove? The politics of transparency. Paper presented at the World Banks Annual Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J., Burns, W., Mertz, C. K., & Slovic, P. (1992). Trust as a determinant of opposition to a high-level radioactive waste repository: analysis of a structural model. Risk Analysis, 12(3), 417–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenburg, W. R. (2004). Can we learn from failure? Journal of Risk Research, 7(2), 153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L. J., Howard, C., & Aaron, I. (1998). Consumers acceptance of transgenic crops. Pesticide Science, 52(4), 338–393.
   Google Scholar
• Gervers, J. H. (1987). The NIMBY syndrome: is it inevitable? Environment, 29(8), 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurabardhi, Z., Gutteling, J., & Kuttschreuter, M. (2005). An empirical analysis of communication flow, strategy and stakeholders’ participation in the risk communication literature 1988–2000. Journal of Risk Research, 8(6), 499–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D. S., & Kim, H. I. (2011). Risk and communication: communication effects on social acceptance of nuclear power. Crisisonomy, 7(2), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Nevitt, J. (1999). Bootstrapping and the identification of exogenous latent variables within structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 394–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. B. (1999). Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. Journal of Risk Research, 2(4), 325–354.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperson, R., Golding, D., & Tuler, S. (1992). Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risks. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 161–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C. W., Song, H. R., & Kim, W. J. (2015). Effects of trust through risk communications on risk perception—focused on the survey of experts about genetic engineering, nano technology and somatic cell clone technology. Crisisonomy, 11(6), 121–135.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, W. J., Lee, C. J., Ha, Y. H., & Cho, H. M. (2009). A study on the risk communication configuration factor and relationship among the factors: focused on the applies to the S-M-C-R-E model through the analysis of nuclear risk. Speech & Communication, 11, 80–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., & Lee, H. S. (2014). The impact of media repertoire, risk perception, risk communication on the acceptance of nuclear power: focusing on the moderating effect of trust. Crisisonomy, 10(4), 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. W., & Kwon, G. H. (2019). The effect of risk communication on the acceptance of policies for high-risk facilities in South Korea: With particular focus on the mediating effects of risk perception. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(2), 337–355. doi:10.1177/0020852317702445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. (1995). Down and dirty: the use and abuse of public trust in risk communications. Risk Analysis, 15(6), 685–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiss, W. (1996). Three phase in the evolution of risk communication practice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, M. Y., Choi, J. M., & Kim, H. S. (2008). Stigma effect of technology with risk: the impact of stigma on nuclear power on the perception and acceptance of products based on radiation technology. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 52(1), 467–500.
   Google Scholar
• Palenchar, M. J., & Heath, R. L. (2007). Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society. Public Relations Review, 33(2), 120–129. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1998). The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management. Risk. Decision and Policy, 3(1), 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J. S. (2009). Trust in nuclear power plant, perceived risk and benefit, and acceptance. The Korean Association for Policy Studies, 18(4), 93–124.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713–720. doi:10.1111/risk.2000.20.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., Cvetkovich, G., & Roth, C. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20(3), 353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1993). Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analysis, 13(6), 673–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. P., & Eiser, J. R. (2006). Marginal trust in risk managers: Building and losing trust following decisions under uncertainty. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 1187–1203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitfield, S. C., Rosa, E. A., Dan, A., & Dietz, T. (2009). The future of nuclear power: Value orientations and risk perception. Risk Analysis, 29(3), 425–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar