MacPolicy a group decision support system

7. Notes and references

• “More recent research has recognized a much broader application and role for GDSSs . Jan. 1990 . in Information & Management, vol. , 18 ( n° 1 ) : 15 – 28 . •, which now are viewed as supported searching for alternatives, communication, deliberation, planning, problem solving, negotiation, consensus building, and vision sharing, as well as decision making for group members not necessarily in the same place or at the same time.” in Douglas VOGEL and Jay NUNAMAKER “Group Decision Support System impact: Multi- Methodological Exploration,”
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The most basic goal of a GDSS is to support and structure the exchange of ideas, opinions, and preferences within a group. In addition, the GDSS must account for myriad variables that may affect group meetings and the organization in which they occur” in Brent GALLUPE and James MCKEEN, “Enhancing Computer-mediated Communication: An Experimental Investigation into the Use of a Group Decision Support System for Face-to- Face Versus Remote Meetings”
   Google Scholar
• “In December 1986, the new field of “Computer Supported Cooperative Working” was opened by a conference at Austin in Texas . 1989 . in 79 – 114 . • The core concept has been summarized as “groupware”-computer software designed for use by groups rather than individuals.” Mike ROBINSON”Double Level Languages & cooperative working”. Proceedings of the int. Conference on “Support, Society and Culture: Mutual Uses of Cybernetics and Science” OOC, University of Amsterdam
   Google Scholar
• At least there is a different marketing approach: previously GDSS primarily had success in “High-tech” equipped computer-rooms at Universities in the U.S.A. where animators guided the sessions. CSCW on the other hand seems to be aiming at the larger existing network software market. There is some (although small) European effort not to miss the boat this time. COST, a European organization to promote cooperation on science and technology, has recently established a research action in order to enhance the collaboration of research groups working on Cooperation Technology. “Ce terme englobe l'étude théorique et pratique des modes d'interaction entre individus équipés d'ordinateurs et de réseaux de (télé) communications, propres à créer un environnement optimal pour un travail collectif dans le cadre de systèmes répartis faisant appel à des technologies de pointe… Récemment, l'ensemble de la recherche en matière de coopération a fait l'objet aux Etats-Unis d'une noyau de centres de recherche bien connu comme le Xerox Parc, Bellcore, la Carnegie-Melon University, le MIT, etc, un grand nombre de chercheurs appartenant à différentes disciplines. De fait, la description et l'analyse d'une multitude de systèmes de travail sont devenues un nouveau domaine de recherche interdisciplinaire. Même si quelque groupes de recherche européens ont commencé à s'engager dans cette voie, les Etats-Unis disposent d'une nette avance dans ce domaine important”. Déclaration commune d'intention pour la mise en œuvre d'une action de recherche européenne sur la technologie de la coopération (Co-tech) Action Cost, 14 juillet 1990
   Google Scholar
• Beauclair , Renee . 1985 . “The computer as communication tool: the case of computer facilitated group decision making,” paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Central States Speech Association, Indianapolis, IN, April 4–6 ” . In The computerized group decision making system has potential to become an important part of an organization, but the research done thus for in this area is unfocused, lacks rigor and a theoretical base, and disregards the communication component of the technology except on the most pragmatic, fundamental level In the future, researchers should study GDSS as a communication system in order to generate the best design for decision making strategies
   Google Scholar
• Desanctis , Gerardine and Gallupe , Brent . 1987 . “A foudation for the study of group decision support systems,” . Management Science, vol. , 33 ( n° 5 ) May : 589 – 609 . •
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten , Gregory . 1987 . “On two roles decision support systems can play in negotiations,” . Information Processing and Management, vol. , 23 ( n° 6 ) : 604 – 614 . •
   Google Scholar
• Konsynski , Benn . 1988 . “Decision support and knowledge-based systems,” . Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. , 5 ( n° 1 ) : 3 – 116 . •
   Google Scholar
• Kydd , Christine and Jones , Louise . Dec. 1989 . “Corporate productivity and shared information technology,” . Information & Management, vol. , 7 ( n° 5 ) : 277 – 282 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski , Andrzej . Dec. 1989 . “SCFAS—decision support system for group decision making: decision theoretic framework,” . Decision Support Systems, vol. , 5 ( n° 4 ) : 403 – 423 .
   Google Scholar
• Lipinski , Andrew , Lipinski , Hubert and Randolph , Robert . 1975 . “Computer-assisted expert interrogation: a report on current methods development,” . Technological Forecasting and Social Change, n° , 7 : 113 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgrath , Michael . 1986 . “Strategic decision making and group decision support systems,” . New Directions for Institutional Research, n° , 49
   Google Scholar
• Uta , PANKOKE-BABATZ . 1989 . Computer based group communication: the AMIGO activity model , : 320 Ellis Horwood, 320 p., Chichester 1989”This book represents research work undertaken by the AMIGO (advanced messaging in group organizations) group on advanced group communication, and is aimed at promoting a lucid understanding and development of technical support for group communication processes. In particular human communication needs when using distributed, time-deferred communication systems are investigated. The authors outline the material, concepts and results produced as an outcome of the Group's work. (…) They give the background to group communication, communication patterns, the needs and concepts for technical support and the impact of such support.”
   Google Scholar
• Rouse , William and Sheridan , Thomas . 1975 . “Computer-aided group decsion making: theory and practise,” . Technological Forecasting and Social Change, n° , 7 : 113 – 126 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HILTZ Roxanne , STARR , Kenneth , JOHNSON and Murray , TUROFF . 1981 . “The quality of group decision making in face-to-face vs computerized conferences,” . Association Paper for the American Sociological Association ,
   Google Scholar
• Starr , HILTZ Roxanne , Johnson , Kenneth and Turoff , Murray . 1986 . “Experiments in group decision making: communication process and outcome,” . Human Communication Research, vol. , 13 ( n° 2 ) Winter : 225 – 252 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HILTZ Roxanne , STARR and Murray , TUROFF . 1978 . “Electronic networks: the social dynamics of a new communications medium,” . Association Paper for the American Sociological Association ,
   Google Scholar
• Stohr , Edward . 1987 . “Decision Support and Knowledge-Based Systems,” . Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. , 3 ( n° 4 ) : 3 – 92 .
   Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray . 1972 . “Delphi conferencing: computer-based conferencing with anonymity”. . Technological Forecasting and Social Change, n° , 3 : 159 – 204 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack , WHITEHEAD . 1984 . “Improving meeting productivity,” . Proceedings of the southeast convention of the american business communication association 31st , : 185 – 191 . Professional communication in the modern world Hammond, LA, April 5–7
   Google Scholar
• Linstone , H. A. and Turoff , M. 1975 . “ (eds.). ” . In The Delphi method: techniques and applications Addison-Wesley . Reading Massachusetts, p. 3, “For, if anything is “true” about Delphi today, it is that in its design and use Delphi is more of an art than a science.”
   Google Scholar
• Mitroff , I. I. and Turoff , M. 1975 . The Delphi method, techniques and applications Addison-Wesley Massachusetts . “Philosophical and methodological foundations of Delphi,” in LINSTONE H.A., TUROFF M., p.21
   Google Scholar
• Van , HOUTEN H.J. 1988 . “Vijf variaties op het Delphi thema,” . In Delphi: methode of mode?, SISWO publicatie 327, Amsterdam, p. 18, juin Edited by: Daniels , J. J.M.C. and En , DUIJZER G.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone , H. A. and Turoff , M. 1975 . The Delphi method: techniques and applications Addison-Wesley . Reading Massachusetts, p. 3
   Google Scholar
• •The subjects of the two larger policy Delphi-projects were “staggering of holidays in flanders”1 and “leisure education and the school”. Another project is in progress: “profile of the future of education and career advice offices”
   Google Scholar
• Corijn , Eric and Theeboom , Marc . 1988 . “Een toekomst maken voor Vrijetijdsopvoeding, een delphi-onderzoek,” . Vrijetijdsopvoeding en de School, Deel , 2 •, VUB-VTBP
   Google Scholar
• Kenis , Dirk and Danau , Dominique . 1986 . Edited by: Vakantiespreiding . • “Vakantiespreiding in de tijd,” in Prof. Dr. BOLLAERT L., KENIS D., VUB- VTBP, Brussel
   Google Scholar
• Myriam , STOFFEN . “De profilering van de Gemeenschaps PMSCentra”VUB-VTBP,” to be published 1992
   Google Scholar
• Linstone , H. A. and Turoff , M. 1975 . “ (eds.) ” . In The Delphi method: techniques and applications Addison-Wesley . Reading Massachusetts
   Google Scholar
• Starr , HILTZ Roxanne and Turoff , Murray . 1978 . The network nation: human communication via Computer Vol. 528 , Addison-Wesley . Massachusetts
   Google Scholar
• Starr , HILTZ Roxanne and Turoff , Murray . 1989 . “Experiments in group decision making: disinhibition, deindividuation, and group process in pen name and real name computer conferences,” . Decision Support Systems, vol. , 5 ( n° 2 ) : 217 – 323 . •, Jun
   Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray . Aug. 1975 . “The future of computer conferencing,” . Futurist, vol. , 9 ( n° 4 ) : 182 – 190 . •
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray and Starr , HILTZ Roxanne . 1982 . “The electronic journal: a progress report,” . Journal of the ASIS, vol. , 33 ( n° 4 ) : 195 – 202 . •, Jul
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray . 1978 . 'The EIES experience: electronic information exchange system”. . Bulletin of ASIS, vol. , 4 ( n° 5 ) : 9 – 10 . •, Jun. “EIES is a rich system that rests upon the premise that the computer can be used to tailor communication structures and protocols to facilitate the needs of individual user groups. User behavior seems to follow a significant pattern.(…) The most experienced users on EIES have to come to the view that the groups in which they participate lake on the essence of a biological system with a functioning different from the sum of the individuals who compose it.”
   Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray and Chinai , Sanjit . 1985 . “An electronic information marketplace”. . Computer Networks & ISDN Systems, vol. , 9 ( n° 2 ) : 79 – 90 . •, Feb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray . 1988 . 26 – 28 . and others “Computer mediated communications and tailorability,” paper presented at the Computer supported cooperative work conference, 2nd, Portland, OR, Se,14 p.
   Google Scholar
• Turoff , Murray . 1973 . Computer Decisions, vol.5, n° , 1 : 25 – 29 . “Human communications via data networks,”, Jan
   Google Scholar
• The figures used in this paper are screen dumps of a previous prototype implemented in hypercard . The new prototype available for testing in December ‘91 is developed in Smalltalk’ 80 on top of a Object Oriented Database, Versant
   Google Scholar
• Brans , J. P. 1982 . “The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision making,” CSOO Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Center for Statistics and Operational Research ” .
   Google Scholar
• Brans , J. P. and Mareschal , B. 1986 . PROMCALC, the PROMETHEE software user's guide, VUB, HWPR/034, 25 p.
   Google Scholar
• BRANS , J. P. , MARESCHAL , B. and GAIA , A . 1991 . software package for geometrical analysis of interactive decision making, ULB-SMG 1987
   Google Scholar
• “Intelligent, distributed task management in computer networks” . 1991 . Research project submitted to the Ministry of science policy in the context of a concerted action program. V.U.B.
   Google Scholar