Workflow management for ETL development

References

• Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A. H. M., & La Rosa, M. (2011). Open source software for workflow management: The case of YAWL. IEEE Software, 28, 16–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso G., & Schek, H. J. (1996). Research issues in large workflow management systems. In Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation in Information Systems (pp. 126–132). Athens, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Aversano, L., Betti, S., De Lucia, A., & Stefanucci, S. (2001). Introducing workflow management in software maintenance processes. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (pp. 441–450). Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Aversano, L., Canfora, G., De Lucia, A., & Gallucci, P. (2002). Business process reengineering and workflow automation: A technology transfer experience. Journal of Systems and Software, 63(1), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, D. P., & Tayi, G. K. (1999). Enhancing data quality in data warehouse environments. Communications of the ACM, 42, 73–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brobst, S., McIntire, M., & Rado, E. (2008). Agile data warehousing with integrated sandboxing. Business Intelligence Journal, 13, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, S., & Dayal, U. (1997). An overview of data warehousing and OLAP technology. SIGMOD Record, 26, .doi:10.1145/248603.248616.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U., & Narasayya, V. (2011). An overview of business intelligence technology. Communications of the ACM, 54, 88–98. doi:10.1145/1978542.1978562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Chiang, R. H., & Storey, V. C. (2012). Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1165–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, T., Corral, K., & Demirkan, H. (2006). Seven key interventions for data warehouse success. Communications of the ACM, 49, .doi:10.1145/1107458.1107464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, B. L., Watson, H. J., Wixom, B., & Goodhue, D. L. (2000). Data warehousing supports corporate strategy at First American Corporation. MIS Quarterly, 24, 547–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cugola, G., Di Nitto, E., Fuggetta, A., & Ghezzi, C. (1996). A framework for formalizing inconsistencies in human-centered systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodologies, 5, 191–230.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, C., & Padmanabhan, V. (2006). Building an enterprise data warehouse and business intelligence solution [online]. Intel IT Whitepaper. Retrieved from http://www.intel.com/IT
   Google Scholar
• Fetaji, B., Fetaji, M., & Ebibi, M. (2010). Software engineering interoperable environment for university process workflow and document management. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 40, 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Gelbard, R., & Spiegler, I. (2005). Living with database conflicts: A temporal branching technique. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 12, 251–265.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulos, D., & Hornick, M. (1994). A framework for enforceable specification of extended transaction models and transactional workflow. International Journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems (World Scientific),doi:10.1142/S0218215794000144.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulos, D., & Hornick, M. (1995). An overview of workflow management: From process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 3, 119–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorla, N. (2003). Features to consider in a data warehousing system. Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Grambow, G., Oberhauser, R., & Reichert, M. (2011). Towards a workflow language for software engineering [online]. Retrieved from http://dbis.eprints.uni-ulm.de/700/1/SE11_SEWL_Grambow.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, M. I., & Xu, H. (2007). The effect of implementation factors on data warehousing success: An exploratory study. Journal of Information, Information Technology, and Organizations, 2, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Junior, M. C., Mendonca, M., & Rodrigues, F. (2009). Data warehousing in an industrial software development environment. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (pp. 131–135). IEEE Computer Society,doi:10.1109/SEW.2009.7
   Google Scholar
• Leymann, F., & Roller, D. (1997). Workflow-based applications. IBM Systems Journal, 36, 102–123.
   Google Scholar
• Lonnqvist, A., & Pirttimaki, V. (2006). The measurement of business intelligence. Information Systems Management, 23, 32–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, R., Remington, S., O’Donnell,, & Sharma, N. (2012). Organisational transformation through business intelligence: Theory, the vendor perspective and a research agenda. Journal of Decision Systems, 21, 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Oberweis, A. (1994). Workflow management in software engineering projects. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Concurrent Engineering and Electronic Design Automation (pp. 55–60). Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N., Burkhardt, P. W., & Hibray, K. W. (2010). Object migration tool for data warehouses. International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications (IJSITA), 1, 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N., Marz, J., & Akhter, S. (2012). An ETL metadata model for data warehousing. Journal of Computing and Information Technology (CIT), 20, 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, N., Rutz, D., & Akhter, S. (2011). Agile development in data warehousing. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), 2, 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, T., Jones, M. C., & Sidorova, A. (2012). Factors influencing business intelligence (BI) data collection strategies: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 52, 486–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramiller, N. C., & Swanson, E. B. (2009). Mindfulness routines for innovating with information technology. Journal of Decision Systems, 18, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, L., & Osei-Bryson, K. (2008). An approach for incorporating quality-based cost-benefit analysis in data warehousing design. Information Systems Frontiers, 10, 361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N., & Grover, V. (2012). Leveraging information technology infrastructure to facilitate a firm’s customer agility and competitive activity: An empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 231–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutz, D., Nelakanti, T. K., & Rahman, N. (2012). Practical implications of real time business intelligence. Journal of Computing and Information Technology (CIT), 20, 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. T. (1999). The evolution of workflow standards. IEEE Concurrency, 3, 44–52.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., Sinha, A. P., & Ramamurthy, K. (2006). Data warehousing process maturity: An exploratory study of factors influencing user perceptions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53, 440–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks, G., & Bekmamedova, N. (2012). Achieving benefits with business analytics systems: An evolutionary process perspective. Journal of Decision Systems, 21, 231–244.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, A. (1995). Workflow automation: Applications, technology and research. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. (pp. 469–69). San Jose, CA, USA, ACM 0-89791-731 -6/95/0005
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, D. M. (2010). Decision support as knowledge creation: A business intelligence design theory. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR), 1, 29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tambe, P., & Hitt, L. M. (2012). The productivity of information technology investments: New evidence from IT labor data. Information Systems Research, 23, 599–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, H. J. (2009). Tutorial: Business intelligence – Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25, 487–510.
   Google Scholar
• Weill, W., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall, 2002, 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Weske, M. (2001). Formal foundation and conceptual design of dynamic adaption in a workflow management system. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, January 3–6, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Weske, M. Goesmann, T. Holten, R., & Striemer, R. (1999). A reference model for workflow application development processes. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration (WACC’99) (pp. 1–10), San Francisco, CA, USA, February 22–25, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Weske, M., Goesmann, T., Holten, R., & Striemer, R. (2001). Analysing, modelling, and improving workflow application development processes. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 6, 35–46. doi:10.1002/spip.134.
   Google Scholar
• White, C. (2005). Data integration: Using ETL, EAI and EII tools to create an integrated enterprise. The Data Warehousing Institute, URL: http://tdwi.org/research/2005/10/bpr-3t-data-integration.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H., & Watson, H. J. (2001). An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quarterly, 25, 17–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, P., & Ramesh B. (2002). Supporting workflow management with traceability. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10), Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, J., & Buyya, R. (2005). A taxonomy of workflow management systems for grid computing. Journal of Grid Computing, 3, 171–200.
   Google Scholar