Intuitive decision-making and deep level diversity in entrepreneurial ICT teams

References

• Baldacchino, L., Ucbasaran, D., Cabantous, L., & Lockett, A. (2015). Entrepreneurship research on intuition: A critical analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 212–231.10.1111/ijmr.2015.17.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33, 328–340.10.5465/AMR.2008.31193166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331–1344.10.1287/mnsc.1060.0538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastick, T. (1982). Intuition: How we think and act. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, A., de Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of group potency: A study of self-managing service teams. Management Science, 51, 1610–1625.10.1287/mnsc.1050.0425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 287–309.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, M., Conboy, K., & Power, K. (2012). Obstacles to decision making in Agile software development teams. The Journal of Systems and Software, 85, 1239–1254.10.1016/j.jss.2012.01.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, D. K., & Crossan, M. (2005). The nature of entrepreneurial opportunities: Understanding the process using the 4I organizational learning framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 425–449.10.1111/etap.2005.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D. M., Bell, S. T., Dierdorff, E. C., & Belohlav, J. A. (2012). Facet personality and surface-level diversity as team mental model antecedents: Implications for implicit coordination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 825–841.10.1037/a0027851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313–1337.10.1177/0149206314559946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., & Neale, M. A. (2001). 8. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: From nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 379–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, V. (2006). Entrepreneurial decision making: Individuals, tasks and cognitions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106.10.1111/bjso.1993.32.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy, Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96–107.10.2307/256901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2014). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity - The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 0149206314545652.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, O. W. (1987). Intuition: Inferential heuristic or epistemic mode? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7, 137–154.10.2190/2L9K-57WM-M917-6FWN
   Google Scholar
• Hough, J. R., & Ogilvie, dt. (2005). An empirical test of cognitive style and strategic decision outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 417–448.10.1111/joms.2005.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., Cooper, D. M., Julin, J. A., & Peyronnin, K. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675–689.10.1037/0021-9010.76.5.675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1971). Spirit and life. Collected Works, 8, 319–337.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. M., Vozdolska, R. R., & McComb, S. A. (2010). Team decision making in computer-supported cooperative work: How initial computer-mediated or face-to-face meetings set the stage for later outcomes*.” Decision Sciences 41(4), 933–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickul, J., Gundry, L. K., Barbosa, S. D., & Whitcanack, L. (2009). Intuition versus analysis? Testing differential models of cognitive style on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and the new venture creation Process, Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 33, 439–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 456–460.10.1518/001872008X288385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Knight, A. P., Ziegert, J. C., Lim, B. C., & Saltz, J. L. (2011). When team members’ values differ: The moderating role of team leadership. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 114, 25–36.10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–604.10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Zhang, D., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2010). Effects of culture, social presence, and group composition on trust in technology-supported decision-making groups. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 297–315.10.1111/isj.2010.20.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P. B., Schuetzler, R. M., Giboney, J. S., & Gregory, T. A. (2015). Is trust always better than distrust? The potential value of distrust in newer virtual teams engaged in short-term decision-making. Group Decision & Negotiation, 24(4), 723–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K., Dennis, A. R., & Carte, T. A. (2008). It’s the thought that counts: The mediating effects of information processing in virtual team decision making. Information Systems Management, 25(1), 20–32.10.1080/10580530701777123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mell, J. N., Van Knippenberg, D. V., & Van Ginkel, W. P. (2014). The catalyst effect: The impact of transactive memory system structure on team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 1154–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C., Burke, L. M., & Glick, W. H. (1998). Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 39–58.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, E., Khapova, S. N., & Elfring, T. (2015). Entrepreneurial team cognition: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(2), 232–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, N. B., Aurum, A., & Dybå, T. (2012). Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development. Information and Software Technology, 54, 853–865.10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, T. A., Hancock, S. E., Zivkov, K., Larson, N. L., & Law, S. J. (2015). Team decision making in virtual and face-to-face environments. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Transactive memory systems. Review of General Psychology, 12, 378.10.1037/1089-2680.12.4.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretz, J. E., & Totz, K. S. (2007). Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1247–1257. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretz., J., Brookings, J. B. Carlson, L., Humbert, T. K. Roy, M., Jones, M., & Memmert, D. (2014). Development and validation of a new measure of intuition: The types of intuition scale. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 454–467. 10.1002/bdm.v27.5
   Google Scholar
• Pridmore, J., & Phillips-Wren, G. (2011). Assessing decision making quality in face-to-face teams versus virtual teams in a virtual world. Journal of Decision Systems, 20, 283–308.10.3166/jds.20.283-308
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams*. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.10.1111/deci.2001.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, N. G., & Rudd, J. M. (2014). The influence of context on the strategic decision-making process: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16, 340–364.10.1111/ijmr.2014.16.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spickermann, A., Zimmermann, M., & Heiko, A. (2014). Surface-and deep-level diversity in panel selection—Exploring diversity effects on response behaviour in foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 105–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 690–709.10.1057/jibs.2009.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turban, E., Liang, T. P., & Wu, S. P. (2010). A framework for adopting collaboration 2.0 tools for virtual group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20(2), 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P. W., van Fenema, P. C., & Tiwari, V. (2008). Cocreating understanding and value in distributed work: How members of onsite and offshore vendor teams give, make, demand, and break sense. MIS Q., 32(2), 227–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. M. G. R. Goethals (Ed.), Theories of group behaviour (pp. 185–208). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3
   Google Scholar