Maturing maturity models – a methodological extension using the analytical hierarchy process and Google PageRank

References

• Bana e Costa, C. A., & Vansnick, J.-C. (2008). A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 1422–1428.10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J., Niehaves, B., Pöppelbuß, J., & Simons, A. (2010). Maturity models in IS research. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2009). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belton, V., & Grear, T. (1985). The legitimacy of rank reversal. A comment. Omega, 13(3), 143–144.10.1016/0305-0483(85)90052-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1985). A preference ranking organisation method. The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making. Management Science, 31(6), 647–656.10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117.10.1016/S0169-7552(98)00110-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrissis, M. B., Konrad, M., & Shrum, S. (2011). CMMI for development: Guidelines for process integration and product improvement. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cleven, A. K., Winter, R., Wortmann, F., & Mettler, T. (2014). Process management in hospitals: An empirically grounded maturity model. Business Research, 7(2), 191–216.10.1007/s40685-014-0012-x
   Google Scholar
• CMMI Product Team. (2010). CMMI for Service, Version 1.3, CMMI-SVC v1. 3. CMU/SEI-2010-TR-034 ( Technical report). Software Engineering Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, B., & Alden, J. (2007). Maturity model du jour: A recipe for side dishes. Retrieved from http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/10-07-COL-maturitymodeldujour-CurtisAldenfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Bruin, T., Rosemann, M., Freeze, R., & Kulkarni, U. (2005). Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkman, R., Vanderfeesten, I., & Reijers, H. A. (2016). Business process architectures: Overview, comparison and framework. Enterprise Information Systems, 10(2), 129–158.10.1080/17517575.2014.928951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstner, E., Kamprath, N., & Röglinger, M. (2014). Capability development with process maturity models. Decision framework and economic analysis. Journal of Decision Systems, 23(2), 127–150.10.1080/12460125.2014.865310
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, P. (2009). Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 75–81.10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 85(4), 111–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, S.-J., & Han, W.-M. (2006). Selection priority of process areas based on CMMI continuous representation. Information & Management, 43(3), 297–307.10.1016/j.im.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1–3), 349–410.10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, J., Nielsen, P. A., & Norbjerg, J. (1999). Situated assessment of problems in software development. Database for Advances in Information Systems, 30(2), 66–81.10.1145/383371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, S. F. (2016). Understanding the five stages of Gartner’s maturity model for manufacturing excellence. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/doc/3425317/understanding-stages-gartners-maturity-model
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Beine, W., & Wang, T. (1979). Right-left asymmetry in an eigenvector ranking procedure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 19(1), 61–64.10.1016/0022-2496(79)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: Measuring and managing the value of companies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kulakowski, K. (2015). Notes on order preservation and consistency in AHP. Journal of Operational Research, 245(1), 333–337.10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.010
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, U., & Freeze, R. (2004). Development and validation of a knowledge management capability assessment model. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lahrmann, G., Marx, F., Mettler, T., Winter, R., & Wortmann, F. (2011). Inductive design of maturity models: Applying the Rasch algorithm for design science research. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems (pp. 176–191). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Langville, A. N., & Meyer, C. D. (2011). Google’s PageRank and beyond: The science of search engine rankings. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnert, M., Röglinger, M., Seyfried, J., & Siegert, M. (2015). Process PageRank – A network-based approach to process prioritization decisions. In Proceedings of the 23rd European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Münster, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnert, M., Linhart, A., & Röglinger, M. (2016). Value-based process project portfolio management: Integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement. Business Research, 9(2), 377–419.10.1007/s40685-016-0036-5
   Google Scholar
• Malinova, M., Leopold, H., & Mendling, J. (2014). A meta-model for process map design. In Proceedings of the Forum at 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE), Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, K., Willems, J., Van den Bergh, J., Deschoolmeester, D., Willaert, P., Stemberger, M. I., … Vlahovic, N. (2009). A global investigation of key turning points in business process maturity. Business Process Management Journal, 15(5), 792–815.10.1108/14637150910987946
   Google Scholar
• Müller, A. L., & Pfleger, R. (2014). Business transformation towards sustainability. Business Research, 7(2), 313–350.
   Google Scholar
• Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4), 18–27.10.1109/52.219617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polatidis, H., Haralambopoulos, D. A., Munda, G., & Vreeker, R. (2006). Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Sources, Part B, 1(2), 181–193.10.1080/009083190881607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöppelbuß, J., & Röglinger, M. (2011). What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Pöppelbuß, J., Niehaves, B., Simons, A., & Becker, J. (2011). Maturity models in information systems research: Literature search and analysis. Communications of the AIS, 29(1), 505–532.
   Google Scholar
• Pöppelbuß, J., Plattfaut, R., & Niehaves, B. (2015). How do we progress? An exploration of alternate explanations for BPM capability development. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 36(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Prananto, A., McKay, J., & Marshall, P. (2003). A study of the progression of e-business maturity in Australian SMEs: Some evidence of the applicability of the stages of growth for e-business model. In Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Röglinger, M., & Kamprath, N. (2012). Business process improvement with maturity models: An analysis of economic relationships. Journal of Business Economics, 82(5), 509–538.10.1007/s11573-012-0570-3
   Google Scholar
• Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J., & Becker, J. (2012). Maturity models in business process management. Business Process Management Journal, 18(2), 328–346.10.1108/14637151211225225
   Google Scholar
• Rosemann, M., & De Bruin, T. (2005). Towards a business process management maturity model. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Regensburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchical structure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3), 234–281.10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1986). Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855.10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonenberg, M. H., Mans, R. S., Russell, N. C., Mulyar, N. A., & Van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2008). Towards a taxonomy of process flexibility. In Proceedings of the Forum at 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE), Montpellier, France.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, L., Jeffery, R., Carvalho, L., D’Ambra, J., & Rutherford, P. (2001). Practical software process improvement – the IMPACT project. In Proceedings of the Software Engineering Conference (pp. 182–189), Canberra, Australia: ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, A. K., & Sethi, S. P. (1990). Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2(4), 289–328.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. E., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (2004). Decision analysis in management science. Management Science, 50(5), 561–574.10.1287/mnsc.1040.0243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Software Engineering Institute (2009). CMMI for Services, Version 1.2.. Retrieved from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/09tr001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tarhan, A., Turetken, O., & Reijers, H. A. (2016). Business process maturity models: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 75, 122–134.10.1016/j.infsof.2016.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomashevskii, I. L. (2015). Eigenvector ranking method as a measuring tool: Formulas for errors. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 774–780.10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process. An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1–29.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510–540.10.2307/258786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Looy, A., De Backer, M., & Poels, G. (2011). Defining business process maturity: A journey towards excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(11), 1119–1137.10.1080/14783363.2011.624779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C., Curtis, B., & Gardiner, T. (2008). Business process maturity model (BPMM) version 1.0. Retrieved from http://doc.omg.org/formal/08-06-01.pdf
   Google Scholar