Living in the tension: an organisational decision-making framework and paradigm

References

• Anscombe, G.E.M. (2000). Intention. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnott, D., & Pervan, G. (2014). A critical analysis of decision support systems research revisited: the rise of design science. Journal of Information Technology, 29, 269–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words (Vol. 88). Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C.L., Saxe, R., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2009). Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition, 113(3), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom, R.B. (2008). Between saying and doing: Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandom, R.B. (2019). A spirit of trust: A reading of Hegel’s phenomenology. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, P.H. (2016). The ethics of discernment: Lonergan’s foundations for ethics. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A.R. (2006). Descartes’ error. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G., Weinsheimer, J., & Marshall, D.G. (2004). EPZ truth and method. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorry, G.A., & Morton, M.S. (1989). A framework for management information systems. Sloan Management Review, 30(3), 49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, M.S. (2013). Consciousness and the social brain. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, G.J. (2013). Leveraging lessons learned in organizations through implementing practice-based organizational learning and performance improvement: An opportunity for Context-Based Intelligent Asisstant Support (CIAS) [ Thesis (PhD), NUI, 2013]. University College Cork. https://hdl.handle.net/10468/1256
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, J.M. (2022). Situated management learning. In P. Brezillon & R. Turner (Eds.), Modeling and using context in action (pp. 245–266). ISTE.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, J., & Maubrey, R. (2020). Decision making for sustainable development. Journal of Decision Systems, 29(sup1), 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2020.1847834
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and essences: Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In L. C. MacLean & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99–127). World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, B.M., Ullman, T.D., Tenenbaum, J.B., & Gershman, S.J. (2016). Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16001837. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.00289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E., & Saint-Macary, J. (1995). Opening up decision making: The view from the black stool. Organization Science, 6(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.3.260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition. Knowledge and Society, 6(6), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Moigne, J.-L. (1990). La modélisation des systèmes complexes. Bordas.
   Google Scholar
• LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. nature, 521(7553), 436-444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
   Google Scholar
• List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan, B. (1967). Cognitional structure. Collection, 221, 239.
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan, B. (1992). Insight: A study of human understanding (Vol. 3). University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan, B. (2017). Method in Theology: 14. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (2004). The logic of appropriateness. The Oxford Handbook of Political Science (Vol. 4, pp. 478–497). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0024
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M.H. (2015). Authenticity as self-transcendence: The enduring insights of Bernard Lonergan. University of Notre Dame Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (1996). Mind and world. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1976). Planning on left side and managing on right. Harvard Business Review, 54(4), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J.H.C. (1992). An essay in aid of a grammar of assent. University of Notre Dame Pess.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio, T. (2012). The levels of understanding framework, revised. Perception, 41(9), 1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (2015). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polya, G. (2014). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. (2009). Philosophy and the mirror of nature (Vol. 81). Princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/286788
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (Global ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. (2000). What we owe to each other. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J.R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1(19), 253–329.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., & Williams, B. (1982). Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1992). The ethics of authenticity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R.H., & Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegelin, E. (1989). Structures of consciousness. Collected works of Eric Voegelin Vol 33. University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior (60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition). Princeton university press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Neal, D.T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114(4), 843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar