Finite element analysis of the stress distributions in peri-implant bone in modified and standard-threaded dental implants

References

• Topkaya T, Solmaz MY, Dündar S, et al. Numerical analysis of the effect of implant geometry to stress distributions of three different commercial dental implant system. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2015;18(1):17–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bozkaya D, Muftu S, Muftu A. Evaluation of load transfer characteristics of five different implants in compact bone at different load levels by finite elements analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:486–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun HJ, Cheong SY, Han JH, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:565–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, et al. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:357–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guven S, Atalay Y, Asutay F, et al. Comparison of the effects of different loading locations on stresses transferred to straight and angled implant-supported zirconia frameworks: a finite element method study. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015; 29(4):766–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieger MR, Mayberry M, Brose MO. Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(6):671–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steigenga JT, al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, et al. Dental implant design and its relationship to long-term implant success. Implant Dent. 2003;12(4):306–317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85:585–598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orentlicher G, Teich M. Evolving implant design. The Nobel Active implant: discussion and case presentations. Compendium Continuing in Dentistry. 2010;31(1):67–77.
   Google Scholar
• NobelReplace® and Replace Select™ Tapered. Procedures manual [ Internet]. Zürich: Nobel Biocare Services AG; c2015 [cited 2015 Aug 6]. Available from: https://www.nobelbiocare.com/ca/en/home/products-and-solutions/library/manuals.html
   Google Scholar
• İplikçioğlu H, Akça K. Comperative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three unit fixed partial protheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dentistry. 2002;30:41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou I-C, Lee S-Y, Wu M-C, et al. Finite element modelling of implant designs and cortical bone thickness on stress distribution in maxillary type IV bone. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2014;17(5):516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guven S, Eratilla V, Beydemir K, et al. The evaluation of stres distributions in 3 and 5 unit dental and implant supported fixed zirconia restorations: finite element analysis. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2015;18(2):128–140.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, et al. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:299–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, et al. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akpinar I, Demirel F, Parnas L, et al. A comparison of stress and strain distribution characteristics of two different rigid implant designs for distal-extension fixed prostheses. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:11–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, et al. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis – a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 1998;24:80–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91:20–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as a function of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant – a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32:279–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2006;9:257–270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995;10:326–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misch CE. Contemporaray implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 337.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, et al. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(4):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valen M. The relationship between endosteal implant design and function: maximum stress distribution with computer-formed, three dimensional Flexi-Cup blades. J Oral Implantol. 1983;11(1):49–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valen M, Locante WM. LaminOss immediate-load implants: I. Introducing osteocompression in dentistry. J Oral Implantol. 2000;6(3):177–184.
   Google Scholar
• Hyo-Sook R, Namgung C, Lee J-H, et al. The influence of thread geometry on implant osseointegration under immediate loading: a literature review. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014;6:547–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, et al. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(2):173–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunski JB. Biomechanical considerations in dental implant design. Int J Oral Implantol. 1988;5(1):31–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misch CE. Contemporaray implant dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2008. p. 810–811.
   Google Scholar
• Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15(1):76–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PK, Chen YC, Huang CC, et al. Distribution of micromotion in implants and alveolar bone with different thread profiles in immediate loading: a finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27:96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica. 1981;52(2):155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnhart C, Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, et al. Comparison of variable-thread tapered implant designs to a standard tapered implant design after immediate loading. A 3-year multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012;5:123–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(5):293–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams MA. Spine update mechanical testing of the spine an appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine. 1995;20(19):2151–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkın H, Xu LX, Holmes KR. Recent developments in modeling heat transfer in blood perfused tissues. Biomed Eng. 1994;41(2):97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Guven S, Aguloglu S, Beydemir K, et al. Examination of stress distribution and fracture resistance in five-unit tooth- and implant-supported partial fixed zirconia prosthesis. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. Forthcoming 2015. doi:10.1080/13102818.2015.1073122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar