Assessment of genetic diversity in natural European hophornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.) populations in Turkey

References

• Young AG, Boyle T, Brown T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1996;11:413–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajpai PK, Warghat AR, Sharma RK, et al. Structure and genetic diversity of natural populations of Morus alba in the Trans-Himalayan Ladakh region. Biochem Genet. 2014;52:137–152. 3-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baverstock PR, Moritz C. Project design. In: Hillis D, Moritz C, Mable B, editors. Molecular systematics. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates Inc; 1996. p. 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Allendorf FW, Luikart G. Conservation and the genetics of populations. Carlton: Blackwell Publishing; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso SRS, Provan J, Lira CDF, et al. High levels of genetic structuring as a result of population fragmentation in the tropical tree species Caesalpinia echinata Lam. Biodivers Conserv. 2005;14:1047–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice HC, Lonn M, Rosquist G, et al. Gene diversity. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Yao XH, Ye QG, Kang M, et al. Microsatellite analysis reveals interpopulation differentiation and gene flow in the endangered tree Changiostyrax dolichocarpa (Styracaceae) with fragmented distribution in central China. New Phytol. 2007;176:472–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sork VL, Nason J, Campbell DR, et al. Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999;14:219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe AJ, Boshier D, Ward M, et al. Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity. 2005;95:255–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of populations. Science. 1987;236:787–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruttanaprasert R, Banterng P, Jogloy S, et al. Genotypic variability for tuber yield, biomass, and drought tolerance in Jerusalem artichoke germplasm. Turk J Agr Forestry. 2014;38:570–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlcek J, Valsikova M, Druzbikova H, et al. The antioxidant capacity and macroelement content of several onion cultivars. Turk J Agr Forestry. 2015;39:999–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm GW, Renner SS. Harvesting Betulaceae sequences from GenBank to generate a new chronogram for the family. Bot J Linn Soc. 2013;172:465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubitzki K. Betulaceae. In: Kubitzki K, editor. The families and genera of vascular plants. Berlin: Springer; 1993. p. 152–157.
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZD, Manchester SR, Sun HY. Phylogeny and evolution of the Betulaceae as inferred from DNA sequences, morphology and palaeobotany. Am J Bot. 1999;86:1168–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn JH. A guide to useful woods of the world. Portland (ME): King Philip Publishing Co; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Alden HA. Hardwoods of North America. General Technical Report-Forest Products Laboratory. USDA Forest Service. ( FPL-GTR-83); 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Dogu AD, Kartal SN, Kose C, et al. Some anatomical properties and wood density of Ostrya carpinifiloa Scop. JFFIU. 2000;50:167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Yaltirik F, Efe A. Dendrology handbook, Gymnospermae–Angiospermea. ( University of Istanbul Publication; no. 4265). ( Faculty of Forestry Publication; no. 465); 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Davis PH. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Island. Vol. 7. Edinburgh (TX): Edinburgh University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Ansin R, Ozkan, ZC. Phanerogameus woody taxons. Vol. 167. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University Publication; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya Z, Raynal DJ. Biodiversity and conservation of Turkish forests. Biol Conserv. 2001;97:131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkut S, Guller B. Physical and mechanical properties of European Hophornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.) wood. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99:4780–4785. 11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piskur B, Pavlic D, Slippers B, et al. Diversity and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae on declining Ostrya carpinifolia in Slovenia and Italy following extreme weather conditions. Eur J Forest Res. 2011;130:235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuinica LG, Abreu I, Silva JE. Effect of air pollutant NO2 on Betula pendula, Ostrya carpinifolia and Carpinus betulus pollen fertility and human allergenicity. Environ Pollut. 2014;186:50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulaç Ş, Güney D, Çiçek E, et al. Effect of provenance, stratification and temperature on the germination of European hophornbeam (Ostrya carpinifolia Scop.) seeds. J Food Agric Environ. 2013;11:2815–2819.
   Google Scholar
• Li J. Sequences of low-copy nuclear gene support the monophyly of Ostrya and paraphyly of Carpinus (Betulaceae). J Syst Evol. 2008;46:333–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng SG, Lu JJ, Gao L, et al. Molecular phylogeny analysis and species identification of Dendrobium (orchidaceae) in China. Biochem Genet. 2014;52:127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JG, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, et al. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(22):6531–6535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filiz E, Birbilener S, Ozyigit II, et al. Assessment of genetic variations of silver lime (Tilia tomentosa Moench.) by RAPD markers in urban and forest ecosystems. Biotechnol Biotec Equip. 2015;29:631–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrianoelina O, Rakotondraoelina H, Ramamonjisoa L, et al. Genetic diversity of Dalbergia monticola (Fabaceae) an endangered tree species in the fragmented oriental forest of Madagascar. Biodivers Conserv. 2006;2:49—68.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Zhang HG, Li XF. Analysis of genetic diversity in Larix gmelinii (Pinaceae) with RAPD and ISSR markers. Genet Mol Res. 2013;12:196–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagidimitriou M, Katsiotis A, Menexes G, et al. Genetic diversity of major Greek olive cultivars using molecular (AFLPs and RAPDs) markers and morphological traits. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 2005;130:211–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M, Crow JF. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics. 1964;49:725–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70:3321–3323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978;89:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nei M. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott JM, McDonald BA. Gene flow in plant pathosystems. Ann Rev Phytopathol. 1993;31:353–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh FC, Boyle T, Rongcai Y, et al. POPGENE version 1.32: Microsoft windows-based freeware for population genetic analysis. Edmonton: University of Alberta; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10:564–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao VR, Hodgkin T. Genetic diversity and conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2002;68:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Zou Y, Bai J, et al. RAPD analysis of genetic variation in natural populations of Betula alnoides from Guangxi, China. Euphytica. 2003;134:33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín C, Parra T, Clemente-Muñoz M, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of the endangered Betula pendula subsp. fontqueri populations in the south of Spain. Silva Fenn. 2008;42:487–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop IF, Pamfil D, Raica PA, et al. Evaluation of the genetic diversity of several Corylus avellana accessions from the Romanian national hazelnut collection. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj. 2010;38:61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafkas S, Doğan Y, Sabır A, et al. Genetic characterization of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars from Turkey using molecular markers. Hortscience. 2009;44:1557–1561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdogan V, Koksal AI, Aygun A. Assessment of genetic relationships among Turkish hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars by RAPD markers. Rom Biotech Lett. 2010;15:5591–5601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryman N, Leimar O. GST is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation – a comment on Jost's D. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:2084–2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf PG, Soltis PS. Estimates of gene flow among populations, geographic races, and species in the ipomopsis aggregata complex. Genetics. 1992;130:639–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl DL, Clark AG. Principles of population genetics. Vol. 116. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Lacerda DR, Acedo MDP, Lemos FJP, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of natural populations of Plathymenia reticulata (Mimosoideae), a tropical tree from the Brazilian Cerrado. Mol Ecol. 2001;10:1143–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loveless MD, Hamrick JL. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst. 1984;15:65–96.
   Google Scholar
• Karp A, Edwards KJ. Molecular techniques in the analysis of the extent and distribution of genetic diversity. Paper presented at: IPGRI Workshop on Molecular Genetic Tools in Plant Genetic Resources; 1995 October 9–11; Rome: IPGRI.
   Google Scholar