Predicting protein function via multi-label supervised topic model on gene ontology

References

• Pandey G, Kumar V, Steinbach M. Computational approaches for protein function prediction: a survey. Twin Cities: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ruepp A, Zollner A, Maier D, et al. The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(18):5539–5545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Suppl 1):D258–D261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer A, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSIBLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids. 1997;25:3389–3402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Fu G, Wang J, et al. Predicting protein function via semantic integration of multiple networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2016;13(2):220–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piovesan D, Giollo M, Leonardi E, et al. INGA: protein function prediction combining interaction networks, domain assignments and sequence similarity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W134–W140.
   Google Scholar
• Piovesan D, Giollo M, Ferrari C, et al. Protein function prediction using guilty by association from interaction networks. Amino Acids. 2015;47(12):2583–2592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellegrini M, Haynor D, Johnson JM. Protein interaction networks. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2004;1(2):239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerri R, Barros RC, de Carvalho AC. A genetic algorithm for hierarchical multi-label classification. Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on applied computing. Trento: ACM; 2012. p. 250–255.
   Google Scholar
• Clark WT, Radivojac P. Analysis of protein function and its prediction from amino acid sequence. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf. 2011;79(7):2086–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ML, Zhou ZH. A review on multi-label learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2014;26(8):1819–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JS, Huang SJ, Zhou ZH. Genome-wide protein function prediction through multi-instance multi-label learning. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2014;11(5):891–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JS, Hu HF, Yan SC, et al. Multi-instance multilabel learning with weak-label for predicting protein function in electricigens. BioMed Res Int. 2015; 2015(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vens C, Struyf J, Schietgat L, et al. Decision trees for hierarchical multi-label classification. Mach Learn. 2008;73(2):185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Rangwala H, Domeniconi C, et al. Predicting protein function using multiple kernels. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2015;12(1):219–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero FEB, Freitas AA, Johnson CG. A hierarchical multi-label classification ant colony algorithm for protein function prediction. Memetic Comput. 2010;2(3):165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Dumais ST. Latent semantic analysis, Ann Rev Inf Sci Technol. 2004;38(1):188–230.
   Google Scholar
• Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3:993–1022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin L, Lin T, Wen D, et al. An overview of topic modeling and its current applications in bioinformatics. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin TN, Chambers A, Smyth P, et al. Statistical topic models for multi-label document classification. Mach Learn. 2012;88(1–2):157–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramage D, Hall D, Nallapati R, et al. Labeled LDA: a supervised topic model for credit attribution in multi-labeled corpora. Proceedings of the 2009 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. Vol. 1. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics; 2009. p. 248–256.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage D, Manning CD, Dumais S. Partially labeled topic models for interpretable text mining. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, San Diago, CA: ACM. 2011. p. 457–465.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Downey D, Boyd-Graber J, et al. Efficient methods for incorporating knowledge into topic models. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. September 17-21; Lisbon, Potugal; 2015. p. 308–317.
   Google Scholar
• La Rosa M, Fiannaca A, Rizzo R, et al. Probabilistic topic modeling for the analysis and classification of genomic sequences. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16(6):S2.
   Google Scholar
• Bisgin H, Liu Z, Fang H, et al. Mining FDA drug labels using an unsupervised learning technique-topic modeling. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12(10):S11.
   Google Scholar
• Pinoli P, Chicco D, Masseroli M. Enhanced probabilistic latent semantic analysis with weighting schemes to predict genomic annotations. 2013 IEEE 13th international conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE).Chania, Greece: IEEE, 2013, p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Masseroli M, Chicco D, Pinoli P. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis for prediction of gene ontology annotations. The 2012 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). Brisbane: IEEE; 2012. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pinoli P, Chicco D, Masseroli M. Latent Dirichlet allocation based on Gibbs sampling for gene function prediction. 2014 IEEE conference on computational intelligence in bioinformatics and computational biology. Honolulu, USA: IEEE, 2014,p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Leander S, Celine V, Jan S. HMC software and datasets [ Internet]; 2009. Available from: https://dtai.cs.kuleuven.be/clus/hmc-ens/
   Google Scholar
• Krogel MA, Scheffer T. Multi-relational learning, text mining, and semi-supervised learning for functional genomics. Mach Learn. 2004;57(1–2):61–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan XY, Zhang YN, Shen HB. Large-scale prediction of human protein–protein interactions from amino acid sequence based on latent topic features. J Proteome Res. 2010;9(10):4992–5001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua HN, Sung WK, Wong L. Exploiting indirect neighbours and topological weight to predict protein function from protein–protein interactions. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(13):1623–1630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH, et al. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Suppl 1):115D.
   Google Scholar
• Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene ontology [ Internet]; 1999–2015. Available from: http://geneontology.org/
   Google Scholar
• Valentini G. True path rule hierarchical ensembles for genome-wide gene function prediction. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf. 2011;8(3):832–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ML, Zhou ZH. A review on multi-label learning algorithms. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2014;26(8):1819–1837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ML, Zhou ZH. Multilabel neural networks with applications to functional genomics and text categorization. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2006;18(10):1338–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoumakas G, Katakis I, Vlahavas I. Effective and efficient multilabel classification in domains with large number of labels. Proceedings of ECML/PKDD 2008 workshop on Mining Multidimensional Data (MMD’08) . Antwerp, Belgium: MMD2008, 2008, p. 30–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Hüllermeier E. Combining instance-based learning and logistic regression for multilabel classification. Mach Learn. 2009;76(2–3):211–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoumakas G, Katakis I, Vlahavas I. Mining multi-label data. In Oded Maimonn Lior Rokach editors. Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook. New York, NY: Springer US, 2009, p. 667–685.
   Google Scholar