Pilot scale treatment of polluted surface waters using membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR)

References

• Gilbert N. Green protests on the rise in China. Nature. 2012;488:261–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds RL. China's environmental challenges. Shapiro. Cambridge, UK, and Malden, MA: Polity Press. China Quart. 2012;212:1132–1133.
   Google Scholar
• Han D, Currell MJ, Cao G. Deep challenges for China's war on water pollution. Environ Pollut. 2016;218:1222–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S-P, Nàcher CPi, Merkey B, et al. Effective biological nitrogen removal treatment processes for domestic wastewaters with low C/N ratios: A review. Environ Eng Sci. 2010;27(2):111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Wang Y, Sun L, et al. Removal of nitrogenous compounds from polluted river water by floating constructed wetlands using rice straw and ceramsite as substrates under low temperature conditions. Ecol Eng. 2016;88:77–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X-N, Song H-L, Li W, et al. An integrated ecological floating-bed employing plant, freshwater clam and biofilm carrier for purification of eutrophic water. Ecol Eng. 2010;36(4):382–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Liu Y, Jin H. Nitrogen removal from polluted river by enhanced floating bed grown canna. Ecol Eng. 2009;35(1):135–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Zhang Y. Removal of nitrogen (N) from hypereutrophic waters by ecological floating beds (EFBs) with various substrates. Ecol Eng. 2014;62:148–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed T, Paul B, Afrin R, et al. Floating constructed wetland for the treatment of polluted river water: A pilot scale study on seasonal variation and shock load. Chem Eng J. 2016;287:62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao W, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. Bioremediation of polluted surface water by using biofilms on filamentous bamboo. Ecol Eng. 2012;42:146–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vymazal J. The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to nitrogen removal: a review of a recent development. Water Res. 2013;47(14):4795–4811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Li P, Du C, et al. Pilot-scale study of an integrated membrane-aerated biofilm reactor system on urban river remediation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55(30):8373–8382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner S, Terada A, Horn H, et al. Nitritation performance in membrane-aerated biofilm reactors differs from conventional biofilm systems. Water Res. 2010;44(20):6073–6084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Li M, Zhang Y, et al. The treatment of surface water with enhanced membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR). Chem Eng Sci. 2016;144:267–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou F, Li B, Xing M, et al. Surface modification of PVDF hollow fiber membrane and its application in membrane aerated biofilm reactor (MABR). Bioresource Technol. 2013;140:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed T, Semmens MJ, Voss MA. Oxygen transfer characteristics of hollow-fiber, composite membranes. Adv Environ Res. 2004;8(3–4):637–646.
   Google Scholar
• LaPara TM, Cole AC, Shanahan JW, et al. The effects of organic carbon, ammoniacal-nitrogen, and oxygen partial pressure on the stratification of membrane-aerated biofilms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;33(4):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timberlake DL, Strand SE, Williamson KJ. Combined aerobic heterotrophic oxidation, nitrification and denitrification in a permeable-support biofilm. Water Res. 1988;22(12):1513–1517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing LS, Nerenberg R. Total nitrogen removal in a hybrid, membrane-aerated activated sludge process. Water Res. 2008;42(14):3697–3708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade do Canto CS, Rodrigues JA, Ratusznei SM, et al. Feasibility of nitrification/denitrification in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor with liquid circulation applied to post-treatment. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99(3):644–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MABR technology increases energy efficiency. Filtration Separation. 2015;52(6):13.
   Google Scholar
• Brindle K, Stephenson T, Semmens MJ. Nitrification and oxygen utilisation in a membrane aeration bioreactor. J Membr Sci. 1998;144(1–2):197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackner S, Terada A, Smets BF. Heterotrophic activity compromises autotrophic nitrogen removal in membrane-aerated biofilms: results of a modeling study. Water Res. 2008;42(4–5):1102–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibiya K, Terada A, Tsuneda S, et al. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by controlling vertical and horizontal microenvironment in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. J Biotechnol. 2003;100(1):23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satoh H, Ono H, Rulin B, et al. Macroscale and microscale analyses of nitrification and denitrification in biofilms attached on membrane aerated biofilm reactors. Water Res. 2004;38(6):1633–1641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmens MJ, Dahm K, Shanahan J, et al. COD and nitrogen removal by biofilms growing on gas permeable membranes. Water Res. 2003;37(18):4343–4350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syron E, Semmens MJ, Casey E. Performance analysis of a pilot-scale membrane aerated biofilm reactor for the treatment of landfill leachate. Chem Eng J. 2015;273:120–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Li B, Zhao S, et al. Mixed pharmaceutical wastewater treatment by integrated membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) system–a pilot-scale study. Bioresource Technol. 2012;122:189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Liu G-F, Lu H, et al. Biodegradation of Acid Orange 7 and its auto-oxidative decolorization product in membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2012;67:73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varrla E, Backes C, Paton KR, et al. Large-scale production of size-controlled MoS2Nanosheets by shear exfoliation. Chem Mater. 2015;27(3):1129–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujawa K, Klapwijk B. A method to estimate denitrification potential for predenitrification systems using NUR batch test. Water Res. 1999;33(10):2291–2300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu H-D, Lee S-I. Comparison of 4-Stage biological aerated filter (BAF) with MLE process in nitrogen removal from low carbon-to-nitrogen wastewater. Environ Engin Sci. 2009;26(1):163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao YP, Li Y, Liu QM, et al. Treatment effect of membrane- aerated biofilm reactor (MABR) on polluted surface water. Chin J Environ Eng. 2017;11(1):85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Gong Z, Yang F, Liu S, et al. Feasibility of a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor to achieve single-stage autotrophic nitrogen removal based on Anammox. Chemosphere. 2007;69(5):776–784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Li B, Zhao S, et al. COD and nitrogen removal in facilitated transfer membrane-aerated biofilm reactor (FT-MABR). J Membr Sci. 2012;389:257–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada A, Yamamoto T, Tsuneda S, et al. Sequencing batch membrane biofilm reactor for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal: novel application of membrane-aerated biofilm. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;94(4):730–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Terada A, Lackner S, et al. Nitritation performance and biofilm development of co- and counter-diffusion biofilm reactors: modeling and experimental comparison. Water Res. 2009;43(10):2699–2709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Z, Yang F, Zhou F, et al. Control of COD/N ratio for nutrient removal in a modified membrane bioreactor (MBR) treating high strength wastewater. Bioresource Technol. 2009;100(1):136–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto S, Terada A, Tsuneda S. Modeling of membrane-aerated biofilm: Effects of C/N ratio, biofilm thickness and surface loading of oxygen on feasibility of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Biochem Eng J. 2007;37(1):98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Zhang P, Li G, et al. Effect of COD/N ratio on nitrogen removal in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2016;113:74–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin J, Zhang P, Yin J, et al. Nitrogen removal performances of a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2015;102:49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Wang Z, Wei X, et al. Enhanced biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal using sequencing batch membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Chem Eng Sci. 2015;135:559–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi W, Ji G. Quantitative response relationships between nitrogen transformation rates and nitrogen functional genes in a tidal flow constructed wetland under C/N ratio constraints. Water Res. 2014;64:32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wang Y, He W, et al. Responses of biofilm characteristics to variations in temperature and NH4(+)-N loading in a moving-bed biofilm reactor treating micro-polluted raw water. Bioresource Technol. 2013;131:365–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X-y, Chu HP. Membrane bioreactor for the drinking water treatment of polluted surface water supplies. Water Res. 2003;37(19):4781–4791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar