Plant organic farming research – current status and opportunities for future development

References

• Borlaug NE. Ending world hunger: the promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:487–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Pray C, Rozelle S. Enhancing the crops to feed the poor. Nature. 2002;418:678–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cong R, Li H, Zhang Z, et al. Evaluate regional potassium fertilization strategy of winter oilseed rape under intensive cropping systems. Large-scale field experiment analysis. Field Crops Res. 2016;193:34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda R, Patra S. Depletion and contribution pattern of available potassium in Indian coastal soils under intensive cropping and fertilization. Int J Pure Appl Biosci. 2017;5(2):1144–1152.
   Google Scholar
• Yue Q, Xu X, Hillier J, et al. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in agriculture: from farm production to food consumption. J Clean Prod. 2017;149:1011–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birt CA. Food and agriculture policy in Europe. AIMS Public Health. 2016;3(1):131–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlier L. Organic farming: back to the past or the solution for a sustainable agriculture – chance and challenge for the Bulgarian and Romanian agriculture. Paper presented at: Organic farming: CAP Conference; 2005 Oct 4–5; Sofia, Bulgaria.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation EEC 2078/92 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of environmental protection and landscape. Official J L. 1992;215:85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Carlier, L. Ecological and sustainable forage crop production: a good agricultural practice. Bulg J Agric Sci. 1998;4:129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Stojanovic Z, Manic E. Cross-border cooperation, protected, geographic areas and extensive agricultural production in Serbia. Econ Agric. 2010;57(SI-1):79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, et al. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. Bioscience. 2005;55:573–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badgley C, Moghtader J, Quintero E, et al. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2007;22(2):86–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor DJ. Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crop Res. 2008;106:187–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor DJ. Organically grown crops do not a cropping system make and nor can organic agriculture nearly feed the world. Field Crop Res. 2013;144:145–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespo-Herrera LA, Ortiz R. Plant breeding for organic agriculture: something new ? Agric Food Secur. 2015 [cited 2017 Oct 12];4:25. DOI:10.1186/s40066-015-0045-1
   Google Scholar
• Banjara RK, Poudel M. Sustainable model of organic agriculture: a case study of Nepalese farmers. J Adv Acad Res. 2017;3(1):142–163.
   Google Scholar
• Francis C, Schneider M, Kindler B. Science-based organic farming: a resource for educators. Publications from the Center for Applied Rural Innovation (CARI). Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska; 2004. Paper 53. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/caripubs/53/
   Google Scholar
• Gattinger A, Muller A, Haeni M, et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:18226–18231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mader P, Fliebbach A, Dubois D. Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science. 2002;296:1696–1697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsi S, Friedrich T, Kassam A, et al. Soil organic carbon accumulation and greenhouse gas emission reductions from Conservation Agriculture: A literature review. Rome: FAO; 2012. (Integrated Crop Management; Vol. 16)
   Google Scholar
• Jarosch K, Oberson A, Emmanuel F, et al. Phosphorus (P) balances and P availability in a field trial comparing organic and conventional farming systems since 35 years. In: Proceedings of the 19th EGU General Assembly (EGU2017); 2017 Apr 23–28; Vienna, Austria. Munich (Germany): European Geosciences Union; 2017. p. 15377. (Geophysical Research Abstracts; Vol. 19).
   Google Scholar
• Carlier L, Grunert O, Verbruggen I. The influence of less nitrogen fertiliser on the yield and quality of forage crop production. Results of 3 year demonstration fields in the frame of Regulation 2078/92 of the European Commission. Brussels: Agribex; 2000. p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Organic Agriculture and food security in Africa. United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP)-UNCTAD. New York and Geneva: United Nations; 2008. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/docs/ditcted200715_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Postma-Blaauw MB, de Goede RGM, Bloem J, et al. Agricultural identification and de-intensification differentially after taxonomic diversity of predatory mites, earthworms, enchyraeids, nematodes and bacteria. Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;57:39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letourneau DK, Bothwell SG. Comparison of organic and conventional farms: challenging ecologists to make biodiversity functional. Front Ecol Environ. 2008;6(8):430–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T. Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos. 2008;117:354–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehinde T, Samways MJ. Endemic pollinator response to organic vs. conventional farming and landscape context in the Cape Floristic Region biodiversity hotspot. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2012;146:162–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson J, Ahnstrom J, Weibull A. The effect of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol. 2005;42(2):261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole DG, Perkins AJ, Wilson JD, et al. Does organic farming benefit biodiversity ? Biol Conserv. 2005;122:113–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibaldi LA, Gemmill-Herren B, D'Annolfo R, et al. Farming approaches for greater biodiversity, livelihoods, and food security. Trends Ecol Evol. 2017;32(1):68–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck SL, Winqvist C, Mota F, et al. Land use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta analysis. J Appl Ecol. 2014;51:746–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring TF, Kromp B. Which carabid species benefit from organic agriculture? A review of comparative studies in winter cereals from Germany and Switzerland. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003;98:153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigvald R, Köpmans E, Hjort A, et al. [Plant pests in organic farming]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 1994. Swedish.
   Google Scholar
• Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key ? Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:182–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauber J, Mirsch M, Simmering D, et al. Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2003;98:321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider MK, Lüscher G, Jeanneret P, et al. Gains to species diversity in organically farmed fields are not propagated at the farm level. Nat Commun. 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 12];5:4151. DOI:10.1038/ncomms5151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel DG, Sait SM, Kunin WE, et al. Food production vs. biodiversity: comparing organic and conventional agriculture. J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO – helping to build a world without hunger [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; c2015. Conservation agriculture: Introduction; 2012 [cited 2017 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/ca/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kassam A, Friedrich T, Shaxson F, et al. The spread of conservation agriculture: justification, sustainability and uptake. Int J Agric Sustain. 2009;7:292–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm C, Blanco-Canqui H, DeClerck, F, et al. Conservation agriculture and ecosystem services: an overview. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2014;187:87–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuomisto HL, Hodge ID, Riordan P, et al. Das organic farming reduce environmental impacts? – a meta-analysis of European research. J Environ Manage. 2012;112:309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntz M, Gattinger A, Scholberg JM, et al. Influence of reduced tillage on earthworm and microbial communities under organic arable farming. Pedobiologia. 2013;56:251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikha MM, Vigil MF, Benjamin JG. Long-term tillage impacts on soil aggregation and carbon dynamics under wheat-fallow in the central great plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2013;77:594–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana M, Berner A, Mader P, et al. Soil organic carbon and soil bio-physicochemical properties as co-influenced by tillage treatment. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2015;79(5):1435–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonetto B, Rascovan N, Álvarez R, et al. Structure, composition and metagenomic profile of soil microbiomes associated to agricultural land use and tillage systems in Argentine Pampas. PLoS One. 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 12];9(6):e99949. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0099949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza R, Cantão M, Vasconcelos A, et al. Soil metagenomics reveals differences under conventional and no-tillage with crop rotation or succession. Appl Soil Ecol. 2013;72:49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Elsas JD, Kielak AM, Cretoiu MS. The metagenomics of plant pathogen-suppressive soils. In: de Bruijn FJ, editor. Handbook of molecular microbial ecology I: metagenomics and complementary approaches. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2011. p. 275–286. DOI:10.1002/9781118010518.ch32
   Google Scholar
• Shearin AF, Reberg-Horton SC, Gallandt ER. Cover crop effects on the activity-density of the weed seed predator Harpalus rutipes (Coleoptera; Carabidae). Weed Sci. 2008;56:442–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvaney RL, Khan SA, Ellsworth TR. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen: a global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. J Environ Qual. 2009;38(6):2295–2314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggs EM, Watson CA, Rees RM. The fate of nitrogen from incorporated cover crop and green manure residues. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 2000;56:153–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederbeck VO, Bouman OT, Campbell CA, et al. Nitrogen benefits from four green-manure legumes in dryland cropping systems. Can J Plant Sci. 1996;76:307–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badaruddin M, Meyer DW. Grain legume effects on soil nitrogen, grain yield, and nitrogen nutrition of wheat. Crop Sci. 1994;34:1304–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donkova R, Mitova T. Effect of crop rotations on the microbiological activity of soil in organic agriculture. In: Proceedings of the National Conference Biological Plant-Growing, Animal Husbandry and Nutritions; 2014 Nov 27–28; Troyan, Bulgaria. Sofia (Bulgaria): Agricultural Academy; 2014. p. 36–40. Bulgarian.
   Google Scholar
• Briar SS, Wichman D, Reddy GVP. Plant-parasitic nematode problems in organic agriculture. In: Nandwani D, editor. Organic farming for sustainable agriculture. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. p. 107–122. (Sustainable Development and Biodiversity; Vol. 9)
   Google Scholar
• Jones E, Hammond S, Blond C, et al. Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rootstock cultivar on the susceptibility to infection by Ilyonectria species. Phytopathol Mediterr. 2014;53(3):582–583.
   Google Scholar
• Heijden MG, Martin F, Selosse M, et al. Mycorrhizal ecology and evolution: the past, the present, and the future. New Phytol. 2015;205(4):1406–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsvetkov I, Markov E, Dzhambazova T, et al. Mineral elements uptake and dry matter accumulation in mycorrhizated nursery plants Gisela 6/Van. J Mt Agric Balk. 2017;20(1):251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling P, Hodge A, Goodlass G, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2006;113:17–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsvetkov I, Georgieva L, Tsvetkova D, et al. Benefits of the micorrhizal fungi Glomus spp. for grapevine nutrient uptake, biocontrol and microbial ecology. J Mt Agric Balk. 2017;20(1):227–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante P. Genre A, mechanisms underlying beneficial plant-fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nat Commun. 2010 [cited 2017 Oct 12];1:48. DOI:10.1038/ncomms1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith S, Read D. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Verbruggen E, Röling WF, Gamper HA, et al. Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils. New Phytol. 2010;186(4):968–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen M, Swenson W, Querejeta J, et al. Ecology of mycorrhizae: a conceptual framework for complex interactions among plants and fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2003;41(1):271–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu QS, editor. Arbuscular mycorrhizas and stress tolerance of plants. Singapore: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yang YY, Song H, Scheller A, et al. Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with Robinia pseudoacacia in uncontaminated and heavy metal contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;86:146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moonen A-C, Bàrberi P. Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;127:7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oehl F, Sieverding E, Ineichen K, et al. Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different soil depths in extensively and intensively managed agroecosystems. New Phytol. 2005;165:273–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham RF, Wortman SE, Pittelkow CM. Comparison of organic and integrated nutrient management strategies for reducing soil N2O emissions. Sustainability. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 12];9:510. DOI:10.3390/su9040510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinkwater LE, Letourneau DK, Workneh F, et al. Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecol Appl. 1995;5(4):1098–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goklany IM. The ins and outs of organic farming. Science. 2002;298:1889–1890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykorova Z, Ineichen K, Wiemken A, et al. The cultivation bias: different communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detected in roots from the field, from bait plants transplanted to the field, and from a greenhouse trap experiment. Mycorrhiza. 2007 [cited 2017 Oct 12];18:1. DOI:10.1007/s00572-007-0147-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ponti T, Rijk B, van Ittersum MK. The crop yield gap between organic and conventional agriculture. Agric Syst. 2012;108:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature. 2012;485:229–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siderer Y, Maquet A, Anklam B. Need for research to support consumer confidence in the growing organic food market. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16:332–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl J, Strassner C, Hertwig J, et al. Learning from the organic food system as a model for sustainable food systems - the Organic Food System Program. In: Meybeck A, Redfern S, editors. Sustainable value chains for sustainable food systems: a Workshop of the FAO/UNEP Programme on Sustainable Food Systems; 2016 Jun 8–9; Rome, Italy. Rome (Italy:): FAO; 2016. p. 295–302.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation (EC) No. 1804/99. Off J EC. 1999;L 222:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Bruschi V, Shershneva K, Dolgopolova I, et al. Consumer perception of organic food in emerging markets: evidence from Saint Petersburg, Russia. Agribusiness. 2015;31(3):414–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illukpitiya P, Khanal P. Consumer perception of organic food and product marketing. Org Farm Sustain Agric. 2016;9:315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmann G, Ardakani MR, Bàrberi P, et al. Organic Agriculture 3.0 is innovation with research. Org Agric. 2017;7(3):169–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lammerts van Bueren ET, Jones SS, Tamm L, et al. The need to breed crop varieties suitable for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: a review. NJAS Wagen J Life Sci. 2011;58:193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiedeville S, Barjolle D, Mouret JC, et al. Ex-post evaluation of the impacts of the Science-Based Research and Innovation Program: a new method applied in the case of farmers’ transition to organic production in the Camargue. J Innov Econ Manage. 2017;1(22):145–170.
   Google Scholar
• Vanloqueren G, Baret PV. Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in’ case study. Ecol Econ. 2008;66:436–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haussmann BIG, Parzies H. Methodologies for generating variability. Part I; use of genetic resources in plant breeding. In: Ceccarelli S, Guimaracs EP, Weltzien E, editors. Plant breeding and farmer participation. Rome: FAO; 2009. p. 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Bozhanova V, Koteva V, Savova T, et al. Choice of appropriate cereals varieties and seed production for the needs of organic farming in Bulgaria – problems and answers. In: Proceedings of the National Conference Biological Plant-Growing, Animal Husbandry and Nutritions; 2014 Nov 27–28; Troyan, Bulgaria. Sofia (Bulgaria): Agricultural Academy; 2014. p. 68–76. Bulgarian.
   Google Scholar
• Kindu GA, Tang J, Yin X, et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis of nitrogen use efficiency in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Euphytica. 2014;199:207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemens-Hulscher M, van Bueren ETL, Struik PC. Identifying nitrogen-efficient potato cultivars for organic farming. Euphytica. 2014;199:137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson JC, Huggins DR, Jones SS. Characterizing nitrogen use efficiency in natural and agricultural ecosystems to improve the performance of cereal crops in low-input and organic agricultural systems. Elsevier Feld Crop Res. 2008;107:89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyhan GB, Stone SP. Breeding for organic and sustainable production. In: Nandwani D, editor. Organic farming for sustainable agriculture. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. p. 123–136. (Sustainable Development and Biodiversity; Vol. 9)
   Google Scholar
• Hoad S, Topp C, Davies K. Selection of cereals for weed suppression in organic agriculture: a method based on cultivar sensitivity to weed growth. Euphytica. 2008;163:355–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoog H. Organic agriculture versus genetic engineering. NJAS Wagen J Life Sci. 2007;54:387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain EY, Rempelos L, Orr CH, et al. Optimizing nitrogen use efficiency in wheat and potatoes: interactions between genotypes and agronomic practices. Euphytica. 2014;199:119–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baresel J, Zimmermann G, Reents H. Effects of genotype and environment on N uptake and N partition in organically grown winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Germany. Euphytica. 2008;163:347–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doring TF, Bocci R, Hitchings R, et al. The organic seed regulations framework in Europe – current status and recommendations for future development. Org Agric. 2012;2(3–4):173–183.
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commissiom to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions., Action plan for the future of organic production in the European Union. Brussels. 24.3.2014 COM (2014) 179 final.
   Google Scholar
• Messmer M, Wilbois K-P, Baier C, et al. Plant breeding techniques: an assessment for organic farming. 2nd ed. Frick: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL); 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Christov NK, Ilchovska D, Hristov KN. Chemical mutagenesis, mutation breeding and quantitative genetic analyses of maize mutants: from theory to practice. In: Tomlekova NB, Kozgar MI, Wani MR, editors. Mutagenesis: exploring genetic diversity of crops. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2014. p. 169–196.
   Google Scholar
• Nuijten E, Messmer M, Lammerts van Bueren E. Concepts and strategies of organic plant breeding in light of novel breeding techniques. Sustainability. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];9:18. DOI:10.3390/su9010018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre BD, Herren HR, Wakhungu J, et al., editors. Agriculture at a crossroads [Global Report by the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD)]: Synthesis Report: A synthesis of the Global and Sub-Global IAASTD reports. Washington (DC): Island Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bertholdsson NO. Early vigour and allelopathy – two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds. Weed Res. 2005;45:94–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91. Off J EU. 1991;L198:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe MS, Baresel JP, Desclaux D, et al. Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture. Euphytica. 2008 [cited 2017 Oct 12];163:323. DOI:10.1007/s10681-008-9690-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacifico D, Paris R. Effect of organic potato farming on human and environmental health and benefits from new plant breeding techniques. Is it only a matter of public acceptance ? Sustainability. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];8(10):1054. DOI:10.3390/su8101054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell RB. Greener revolutions for all. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(11):1106–1110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis. EFSA J. 2012;10(2):2561:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo L, Zelasco S. Biotech approaches to overcome the limitations of using transgenic plants in organic farming. Sustainability. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];8:497. DOI:10.3390/su8050497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheysen G, Custers R. Why organic farming should embrace co-existence with cisgenic late blight–resistant potato. Sustainability. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 12];9(2):172. DOI:10.3390/su9020172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz E. CRISPR-edited crops free to enter market, skip regulation. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];34:582. DOI:10.1038/nbt0616-582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiml S, Puchta H. Revolutionizing plant biology: multiple ways of genome engineering by CRISPR/Cas. Plant Methods. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];12:8. DOI:10.1186/s13007-016-0103-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertholdsson NO. Breeding spring wheat for improved allelopathic potential. Weed Res. 2010;50:49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabaschi D, Tondelli A, Desiderio F, et al. Next generation breeding. Plant Sci. 2016;242:3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen MM, Landes X, Xiang W, et al. Feasibility of new breeding techniques for organic farming. Trends Plant Sci. 2015 [cited 2017 Oct 12];20. DOI:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryffel GI. Have a dream: organic movements include gene manipulation to improve sustainable farming. Sustainability. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 12];9:392. DOI:10.3390/su9030392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyene Y, Semagn K, Mugo S, et al. Performance and grain yield stability of maize populations developed using marker-assisted recurrent selection and pedigree selection procedures. Euphytica. 2016;208:285–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickson F, Binimelis R, Herrero A. Should organic agriculture maintain its opposition to gm? New techniques writing the same old story. Sustainability. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];8:1105. DOI:10.3390/su8111105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFOAM. Principles of organic agriculture. Bonn: Organics International; 2017 [2017-04-09]. Available from: http://www.ifoam.bio/en/organic-landmarks/principles-organic-agriculture
   Google Scholar
• Pswarayi A, van Eeuwijk FA, Ceccarelli S, et al. Changes in allele frequencies in landraces, old and modern barley cultivars of marker loci close to QTL for grain yield under high and low input conditions. Euphytica. 2008;163:435–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legzdina L, Mezaka I, Beinarovica I, et al. Variability of spring barley traits essential for organic farming in association mapping population. In: Zhang G, Li C, Liu X, editors. Advance in barley sciences: Proceedings of the 11th International Barley Genetics Symposium; 2012 Apr 15–20; Hangzhou, China. Dordrecht ( Netherlands ): Springer; 2013. p. 375–387.
   Google Scholar
• Asif M, Yang R-C, Navabi A, et al. Mapping QTL, selection differentials, and the effect of Rht-B1 under organic and conventionally managed systems in the Attila × CDC Go spring wheat mapping population. Crop Sci. 2015 [cited 2017 Oct 12];55:1129. DOI:10.2135/cropsci2014.01.0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou M., Lu C, Zhang S, et al. Epigenetic map and genetic map basis of complex traits in cassava population. Sci Rep. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 12];7:41232. DOI:10.1038/srep41232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradshaw JE. Plant breeding: past, present and future. Euphytica. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 12];213:60. DOI:10.1007/s10681-016-1815-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktar-Uz-Zaman M, Tuhina-Khatun M, Hanafi MM, et al. Genetic analysis of rust resistance genes in global wheat cultivars: an overview. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2017;31:431–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivek BS, Krishna GK, Vengadessan V, et al. Use of genomic estimated breeding values results in rapid genetic gains for drought tolerance in maize. Plant Genome. 2017 [cited 2017 Oct 12];10:1. DOI:10.3835/plantgenome2016.07.0070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernacchia R, Preti R, Vinci G. Organic and conventional foods: differences in nutrients. Ital J Food Sci. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];2s8(4):565–578. DOI:10.14674/1120-1770/ijfs.v224
   Google Scholar
• Capozzi F, Trimigno A. Using metabolomics to describe food in detail. In: Sebedio J-L, Brennan L, editors. Metabolomics as a tool in nutrition research. Cambridge (UK): Woodhead Publishing; 2015. (Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, No. 266). p. 203–209
   Google Scholar
• Capuano E, Boerrigter-Eenling R, van der Veer, et al. Analytical authentication of organic products: an overview of markers. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93:12–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woese K, Lange D, Boess C, et al. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods – results of a review of the relevant literature. J Sci Food Agric. 1997;74:281–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wishart DS. Metabolomics applications to food science and nutrition research. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2008;19:482–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P, Harnly JM, Lester GM. Flow injection mass spectral fingerprints demonstrate chemical differences in Rio Red grapefruit with respect to year, harvest time, and conventional versus organic farming. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:4545–4553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zörb C, Langenkämper G, Betsche T, et al. Metabolite profiling of wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.) from organic and conventional agriculture. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:8301–8306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonte A, Neuweger H, Goesmann A, et al. Metabolite profiling on wheat grain to enable a distinction of samples from organic and conventional farming systems. J Sci Food Agric. 2014;94:2605–2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotnà H, Kmiecik O, Gazka M, et al. Metabolomic fingerprinting employing DART-TOFMS for authentication of tomatoes and peppers from organic and conventional farming. Food Addit Contam A. 2012;29:1335–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhlig RM, Engel K-H. Influence of the input system (conventional versus organic farming) on metabolite profiles of maize (Zea mays) kernels. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58:3022–3030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, et al. Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil. 2007;291:275–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallverdú-Queralt A, Medina-Remón A, Casals-Ribes I, et al. A metabolomic approach differentiates between conventional and organic ketchups. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:11703–11710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laghi L, Versari A, Marcolini E, et al. Metabonomic investigation by 1H-NMR to discriminate between red wines from organic and biodynamic grapes. Food Nutr Sci. 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 12];5:52. DOI:10.4236/fns.2014.51007
   Google Scholar
• Melgarejo E, Urdiales JL, Sánchez-Jiménez F, et al. Targeting polyamines and biogenic amines by green tea epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Amino Acids. 2010;38:519–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory NG. Consumer concerns about food. Outlook Agric. 2000;29(4):251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesranta SJ, Koistinen KM, Massat N, et al. Effects of agricultural production systems and their components on protein profiles of potato tubers. Proteomics. 2007;7(4):597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempelos L, Cooper J, Wilcockson S, et al. Quantitative proteomics to study the response of potato to contrasting fertilisation regimes. Mol Breed. 2013;31:363–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetard-Jones C, Shotton PN, Rempelos L, et al. Quantitative proteomics to study the response of wheat to contrasting fertilisation regimes. Mol Breed. 2013;31:379–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawrocki A, Thorup-Kristensen K, Jensen ON. Quantitative proteomics by 2DE and MALDI MS/MS uncover the effects of organic and conventional cropping methods on vegetable products. J Proteomics. 2011;74(12):2810–2825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-Y, Lim J. Development of protein biomarkers for the authentication of organic rice. J Appl Biol Chem. 2015;58(4):355–361.
   Google Scholar
• Baranski M, Srednicka-Tober D, Volakakis N, et al. Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: a systematic literature review and meta-analyses. Br J Nutr. 2014;112(5):794–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on organic production and labelling of organic products, amending Regulation (EU) No XXX/XXX of the European Parliament and of the Council [Official controls Regulation] and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007. COM 180 final 2014/0100 (COD).
   Google Scholar
• Korva J, Varis E. Conventional and organic cropping systems at Suitia II; crop growth and yield. Agric Food Sci Finl. 1990;62:309–319.
   Google Scholar
• Denison RF, Bryant DC, Kearney TE. Crop yields over the first nine years of LTRAS, a long-term comparison of field crop systems in a Mediterranean climate. Field Crops Res. 2004;86:267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams PR, Hammitt JK. Perceived risks of conventional and organic produce: pesticides, pathogens, and natural toxins. Risk Anal. 2001;21:319–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper GC, Makatouni A. Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. Br Food J. 2002;104:287–299.
   Google Scholar
• Makatouni A. What motivates consumers to buy organic food in the UK?: Results from a qualitative study. Br Food J. 2002;104:345–352.
   Google Scholar
• Nuttavuthisit K, Thøgersen J. The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: the case of organic food. J Bus Ethics. 2017;140(2):323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzani C, Caputo V, Nayga R, et al. Revisiting consumers’ valuation for local versus organic food using a non-hypothetical choice experiment: does consumers’ personality matter ? Food Qual Prefer. 2017;62:144–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung CL. Consumer preferences and attitudes towards organically grown produce. Eur Rev Agric Econ. 1996;23(3–4):331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly DA. Differences between buyers and nonbuyers of organic produce and willingness to pay organic price premiums. J Agrobus. 1991;9(1):97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Misra S, Huang CL, Ott SL. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticidas-free fresh produce. West J Agric Econ. 1991;16(2):218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke A, von Alvensleben R. Consumer attitudes towards organic food and application of cohort analysis – 1984-1989-1994. Kiel: Lehrstuhl fur Agrarmarketing, Christian-Albrechts University; 1997. ( Working Paper No1).
   Google Scholar
• Gil JM, Gracia A, Sanchez M. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. Int Food Agribus Man. 2000;3(2):207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Aschemann-Witzel J. Aagaard EMN. Elaborating on the attitude-behavior gap regarding organic products: young Danish consumers and in-store food choice. Int J Consum Stud. 2014;38(5):550–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latacz-Lohmann U, Foster C. From “niche” to “mainstream” – strategies for marketing organic food in Germany and the UK. Br Food J. 1997;99:275–282.
   Google Scholar
• Doernberg A, Zasada I, Bruszewska K, et al. Potentials and limitations of regional organic food supply: a qualitative analysis of two food chain types in the Berlin metropolitan region. Sustainability. 2016 [cited 2018 Jan 01];8(11):1125. [20 p.]. DOI:10.3390/su8111125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schott J, Sanders J. Comparison of the organic farming sectors in Germany, Italy and Russia. Braunschweig: Thünen Institute of Farm Economics; 2016. Available from: www.agribenchmark.org
   Google Scholar
• Moser AK. Consumers' purchasing decisions regarding environmentally friendly products: an empirical analysis of German consumers. J Retail Consum Serv. 2016;31:389–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmerling S, Asioli D, Spiller A. Core organic taste: preferences for naturalness-related sensory attributes of organic food among European consumers. J Food Prod Market. 2016;22:824–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabbert S, Häring AM, Zanoli R. Organic farming: policies and prospects. London: Zed Books; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitri C, Oberholtzer L. Organic price premiums remain high. Amber Waves. 2005 [cited 2017 Oct 12];3(4):2. Available from: https://www.ers.usda.gov
   Google Scholar
• Padel S, Lampkin N. The development of governmental support for organic farming in Europe. In: Lockeretz W, editor. Organic farming. An international history. Oxfordshire: CAB International; 2007. p. 93–122.
   Google Scholar
• IFOAM. Norms-IFOAM basic standards for organic production and processing, IFOAM accreditation on criteria for bodies certifying organic production and processing including policies related to IFOAM Norms. Tholey-Theley: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Willer H, Lernoud J, editors. The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2015. FiBL-IFOAM report. Bonn: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick and IFOAM – Organics International; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Yussefi M, Willer H. The world of organic agriculture - statistics and future prospects. Tholey-Theley: International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements – IFOAM; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Huber B, Schmid O, Moller C. Standards and regulations: overview. In: FiBL&IFOAM – organics international. The world of organic agriculture. FiBL&IFOAM; 2017. p. 150–157.
   Google Scholar
• Council Regulation No. 1804/99. Off J EU. 1999;L 222:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 331/2000. Off J EU. 2000;L 048:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Vlahova M, Atanassov A, Carlier L. Possibilities and chances for organic farming in Bulgaria. SWOT analyses on the production in Bulgaria. Project BUL/001/04; 2005. p. 24–34
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on Organic Production and Labeling of Organic Products and Repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. Off J EU L. 2007;189:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Commission Regulation (EC) No 889/2008. Off J. 2008;L 250:1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Jahrl I, Moschitz H, Stolze M. Growing under the common agricultural policy: the institutional development of organic farming in Central and Eastern European countries from 2004 to 2012. Int J Agric Res Governance Ecol. 2016;12(4):357–380.
   Google Scholar
• van Bruggen ANC, Gamliel A, Finckh M. Plant disease management in organic farming systems. Pest Manage Sci. 2016;72:30–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reganold JP, Wachter JM. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nat Plants. 2016 [cited 2017 Oct 12];2:15221. [8 p.]. DOI:10.1038/nplants.2015.221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar