Estimating fungal growth in submerged fermentation in the presence of solid particles based on colour development

References

• Abdul Manan M, Webb C. Extracted substrate colour as an indicator of fungal growth in solid state fermentation. Malaysian J Microbiol. 2016;12(6):445–449.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Manan M, Webb C. Estimation of growth in solid state fermentation: a review. Malays J Microbiol. Forthcoming 2018. Available from: http://mjm.usm.my/uploads/issues/1028/Estimation%20of%20growth%20in%20solid%20state%20fermentation%20A%20review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Koutinas AA, Wang R, Webb C. Estimation of fungal growth in complex, heterogeneous culture. Biochem Eng J. 2003;14(2):93–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui YQ, Ouwehand JNW, van der Lans RGJM, et al. Aspects of the use of complex media for submerged fermentation of Aspergillus awamori. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1998;23:168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotti CT, Vergoignan C, Feron G, et al. Glucosamine measurement as indirect method for biomass estimation of Cunninghamella elegans grown in solid state cultivation conditions. Biochem Eng J. 2001;7(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzani W. A weighing method to identify the microbial growth phases in solid-state fermentation tests. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16(7):601–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oolman T, Liu TC. Filtration properties of mycelial microbial broths. Biotechnol Prog. 1991;7(6):534–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris CM, Kell DB. The estimation of microbial biomass. Biosensors. 1985;1(1):17–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris CM, Todd RW, Bungard SJ, et al. Dielectric permittivity of microbial suspensions at radio frequencies: A novel method for the real-time estimation of microbial biomass. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 1987;9(3):181–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimbault M. General and microbiological aspects of solid substrate fermentation. EJB Elec J Biotechnol. 1998;1(3):174–188.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DA. Growth patterns growth kinetics and the modelling of growth in solid state cultivation. In: Doelle HW, Mitchell DA, Rolz CE, editors. Solid substrate cultivation. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1992. p. 87–112.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DA, Berovic M, Nopharatana M, et al. Introduction to solid-state fermentation bioreactors. In: Mitchell DA, Krieger N, Berovic M, editors. Solid-state fermentation bioreactors: Fundamentals of design and operation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DA, Krieger N, Berovic M, et al. Continuously-mixed, forcefully-aerated bioreactors. In: Mitchell DA, Krieger N, Berovic M, editors. Solid-state fermentation bioreactors: fundamentals of design and operation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2006. p. 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell DA, von Meien OF, Krieger N, et al. A review of recent developments in modelling of microbial growth kinetics and intraparticle phenomena in solid-state fermentation. Biochem Eng J. 2004;17:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell DA, Berovic M, Krieger N. Overview of solid state fermentation. EL-Gewely MR. (eds.). Biotechnol Ann Rev. 2002;8:183–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell DA, Tongta A, Stuart DM, et al. The potential for establishment of axial temperature profiles during solid-state fermentation in rotating drum bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;80(1):114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terebiznik MR, Pilosof AMR. Biomass estimation in solid state fermentation by modelling dry matter weight loss. Biotechnol Tech. 1999;13:215–219.
   Google Scholar
• Koutinas AA, Wang R, Kookos IK, et al. Kinetics parameters of Aspergillus awamori in submerged cultivations on whole wheat flour under oxygen limiting conditions. Biocheml Eng J. 2003;16:23–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kell DB, Markx GH, Davey CL, et al. Real-time monitoring of cellular biomass: methods and applications. Trends Anal Chem. 1990;9(6):190–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecault V, Patel N, Thibault J. An image analysis technique to estimate the cell density and biomass concentration of Trichoderma reesei. Let App Microbiol. 2008;48:402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Baron GV. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Bio Rev. 2002;66(3):506–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariff A. The influence of mode of operation on the production of glucoamylase by Aspergillus awamori [dissertation]. Manchester (UK): University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Favaro L, Basaglia M, Casella S. Processing what bran into ethanol using mild treatments and highly fermentative yeasts. Biomass Bioenergy. 2012;14:605–617.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RH, Shaarani SM, Godoy LC, et al. Bioconversion of rapeseed meal for production of a generic microbial feedstock. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 2010;47:77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corredor DY. Pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass [dissertation]. Manhattan (USA): Kansas State University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Fistes A, Dosenovic T, Rakic D, et al. Statistical analysis of the basic chemical composition of whole grain flour of different cereal grains. Acta Univ Sapientiae Alimentaria. 2014;7:45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul Manan M. Design aspects of solid state fermentation [dissertation]. Manchester (UK): University of Manchester; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Poilpre E, Tronquit D, Goma G, et al. On-line estimation of biomass concentration during transient growth on yeast chemostat culture using light reflectance. Biotechnol Lett. 2002;24(24):2075–2081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alupoaei CE, Garcia-rubio LH. Growth behaviour of microorganisms using UV-vis spectroscopy: Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004;86(2):163–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan MR, Rose JB, Garcia-rubio LH. Use of multiwavelength transmission spectroscopy for the characterization of Cryptosporidium parvum oocycts: Quantitative interpretation. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(22):5254–5261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oto N, Oshita S, Kawagishi S, et al. Non-destructive estimation of ATP contents and plate count on pork meat surface by UV-Vis reflectance spectrum analysis. J Food Eng. 2012;110(1):9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejeune R, Nielsen J, Baron GV. Morphology of Trichoderma reesei QM-9414 in submerged cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1995;47:609–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer HL, Keshavarzmoore E, Lilly MD, et al. Estimation of cell volume and biomass of Penicillium chrysogenum using image analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1992;39(4):384–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittner C, Wehnert G, Scheper T. In situ microscopy for on-line determination of biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;60(1):24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvell JP, Dowd JE. On-line measurement and control of viable cell density in cell culture manufacturing processes using radio-frequency impedance. Cytotechnol. 2006;50:35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintanilla D, Hagemann T, Hansen K, et al. Fungal morphology in industrial enzyme production – modelling and monitoring. Adv Biochem Eng / Biotechnol. 2015;149:29–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosalkar A, Kashid MG. Oxygen uptake rate measurement by modified dynamic method and effect of mass-transfer rates on growth of Pichia stipites: modelling and experimental data comparison. Austin J Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;3(3):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson D, Gustavsson R, Mandenius CF. A soft sensor for bioprocess control based on sequential filtering of metabolic heat signals. Sensors. 2014;14:17864–17882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soccol CR, Spier MR, Vandenberghe LPS, et al. Data acquisition systems in bioprocesses. In: Karakehayov Z, editor. Data acquisition applications. Rijeka (Croatia): InTech; 2012. p. 79–106.
   Google Scholar