DIA (Data Independent Acquisition) proteomic based study on maize filling-kernel stage drought stress-responsive proteins and metabolic pathways

References

• Campos H, Cooper M, Habben JE, et al. Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Res. 2004;90(1):19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Service for Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). Biotechnology for the development of drought tolerant crops. [Internet]. 2008. [cited 2020-08-08]. Available from: http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/32/default.asp
   Google Scholar
• Dai A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3(1):52–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller U, Vaseva II. Extreme climatic events: impacts of drought and high temperature on physiological processes in agronomically important plants. Front Environ Sci. 2014;2:39.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167(2):313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO’s Director-General on How to Feed the World in 2050. Popul Dev Rev. 2009;35:837–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maazou ARS, Tu JL, Qiu J, et al. Breeding for drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Am J Plant Sci. 2016;7:1858–1870.
   Google Scholar
• Xu J, Yuan YB, Xu YB, et al. Identification of candidate genes for drought tolerance by whole-genome resequencing in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:83–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Fu JJ, Gou MY, et al. Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of two maize inbred lines under drought stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;72(4-5):407–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah RP, Chakraborty M, Prasad K, et al. Impact of water deficit stress in maize: phenology and yield components. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurgens SK, Johnson RR, Boyer JS. Dry matter production and translocation in maize subjected to drought during grain fill. Agronj. 1978;70(4):678–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afuakwa JJ, Crookston RK. Using the kernel milk line to visually monitor grain maturity in maize. Crop Sci. 1984;24(4):687–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afuakwa JJ, Crookston RK, Jones RJ. Effect of temperature and sucrose availability on kernel black layer formation in maize. Crop Sci. 1984;24(2):285–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya H, Sahoo L, Panda SK. Molecular physiology of osmotic stress in plants. In: Rout GR, Das AB, editors Molecular stress physiology of plants. Springer India; 2013. p. 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Islam M, Begum MC, Kabir AH, et al. Molecular and biochemical mechanisms associated with differential responses to drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Interact. 2015;10(1):195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava S, Sawant K. Drought stress adaptation: metabolic adjustment and regulation of gene expression. Plant Breed. 2013;132(1):21–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(12):909–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jogaiah S, Govind SR, Tran LSP. Systems biology-based approaches toward understanding drought tolerance in food crops. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2013;33(1):23–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver SN, Dennis ES, Dolferus R. ABA regulates apoplastic sugar transport and is a potential signal for cold-induced pollen sterility in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007;48(9):1319–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luan MD, Xu MY, Lu YM, et al. Expression of zma-miR169 miRNAs and their target ZmNF-YA genes in response to abiotic stress in maize leaves. Gene. 2015;555(2):178–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Zhu QG, Meng QW, et al. Transcript profiling during salt stress of young cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) seedlings via Solexa sequencing. Acta Physiol Plant. 2012;34(1):107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang QY, Niu FJ, Sun XJ, et al. RNA-seq analysis of unintended effects in transgenic wheat overexpressing the transcription factor GmDREB1. The Crop Journal. 2017;5(3):207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Min HW, Chen CX, Wei SW, et al. Identification of drought tolerant mechanisms in maize seedlings based on transcriptome analysis of recombination inbred lines. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pour-Benab SM, Fabriki-Ourang S, Mehrabi AA. Expression of dehydrin and antioxidant genes and enzymatic antioxidant defense under drought stress in wild relatives of wheat. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2019;33(1):1063–1073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo YX, Zhang HH, Yuan YH, et al. Identification and characterization of NAC genes in response to abiotic stress conditions in Picea wilsonii using transcriptome sequencing. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2020;34(1):93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Liu S, Zenda T, et al. Maize leaves drought-responsive genes revealed by comparative transcriptome of two cultivars during the filling stage. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenda T, Liu S, Wang X, et al. Key maize drought-responsive genes and pathways revealed by comparative transcriptome and physiological analyses of contrasting inbred lines. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(6):1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Zenda T, Liu S, et al. Comparative transcriptomic and physiological analyses of contrasting hybrid cultivars ND476 and ZX978 identify important differentially expressed genes and pathways regulating drought stress tolerance in maize. Genes Genomics. 2020;42(8):937–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cánovas FM, Dumas-Gaudot E, Recorbet G, et al. Plant proteome analysis. Proteomics. 2004;4(2):285–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Zhang H, Wang T, et al. Proteomics-based investigation of salt-responsive mechanisms in plant roots. J Proteomics. 2013; 82:230–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komatsu S, Hiraga S, Yanagawa Y. Proteomics techniques for the development of flood tolerant crops. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(1):68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Ning F, Zhang QB, et al. Enhancing omics research of crop responses to drought under field conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosova K, Vitamvas P, Prasil IT, et al. Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress-contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteomics. 2011;74:1301–1322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LM, Jiang TB, Fountain JC, et al. Protein profiles reveal diverse responsive signaling pathways in kernels of two maize inbred lines with contrasting drought sensitivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(10):18892–18918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenda T, Liu S, Wang X, et al. Comparative proteomic and physiological analyses of two divergent maize inbred lines provide more insights into drought-stress tolerance mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Zenda T, Dong A, et al. Comparative proteomic and morpho-physiological analyses of maize wild-type Vp16 and mutant vp16 germinating seeds responses to PEG-induced drought stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(22):5586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zenda T, Liu S, et al. Comparative proteomics and physiological analyses reveal important maize filling-kernel drought-responsive genes and metabolic pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15):3743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong A, Yang Y, Liu S, et al. Comparative proteomics analysis of two maize hybrids revealed drought-stress tolerance mechanisms. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2020;34(1):763–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfa B, Fethi BM, Beligh M, et al. Response to drought of two olive tree cultivars (cv Koroneki and Meski). Sci Hortic. 2008;116:1–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr A. DIA mass spectrometry. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):35–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law KP, Lim YP. Recent advances in mass spectrometry: data independent analysis and hyper reaction monitoring. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2013;10(6):551–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JD, Goodlett DR, Masselon CD. Multiplexed and data-independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2014;33(6):452–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruderer R, Bernhardt OM, Gandhi T, et al. Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14(5):1400–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schgger H. Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology ConsortiumNat Genet. 2000;25(1):25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natsume T, Tanida I, Iemura S, et al. A novel protein-conjugating system for Ufm1, a ubiquitin-fold modifier. EMBO J. 2004;23(9):1977–1986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasakawa H, Sakata E, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Solution structure and dynamics of Ufm1, a ubiquitin-fold modifier 1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;343(1):21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagai T, Levy Y. Ubiquitin not only serves as a tag but also assists degradation by inducing protein unfolding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(5):2001–2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia ZL, Liu QJ, Wu JY, et al. ZmRFP1, the putative ortholog of SDIR1, encodes a RING-H2 E3 ubiquitin ligase and responds to drought stress in an ABA-dependent manner in maize. Gene. 2012;495(2):146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, et al. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2009;29(1):185–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracco SA, Miller MJ, Kurepa J, et al. Genetic analysis of SUMOylation in Arabidopsis: conjugation of SUMO1 and SUMO2 to nuclear proteins is essential. Plant Physiol. 2007;145(1):119–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam N, Singh A, Sahi C, et al. SUMO-conjugating enzyme (Sce) and FK506-binding protein (FKBP) encoding rice (Oryza sativa L.) genes: genome-wide analysis, expression studies and evidence for their involvement in abiotic stress response. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008;279(4):371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur MJ, Van DB, Harrold A. Global SUMO proteome responses guide gene regulation, mRNA biogenesis, and plant stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wang Y, Yang H, et al. Quantitative proteomic analyses identify aba-related proteins and signal pathways in maize leaves under drought conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1827–1823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritossa F. A new puffing pattern induced by temperature shock and DNP in drosophila. Experimental. 1962;18(12):571–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matz JM, Blake MJ, Tatelman HM, et al. Characterization and regulation of cold-induced heat shock protein expression in mouse brown adipose tissue. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(1 Pt 2):R38–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Ohwatari N, Matsumoto T, et al. TGF-beta1 mediates 70-kDa heat shock protein induction due to ultraviolet irradiation in human skin fibroblasts. Pflugers Arch. 1999;438(3):239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplante AF, Moulin V, Auger FA, et al. Expression of heat shock proteins in mouse skin during wound healing. J Histochem Cytochem. 1998;46(11):1291–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro MG. Heat shock factors and the control of the stress response. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59(1):55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong HR. Heat shock proteins. Facts, thoughts, and dreams. A. De Maio. Shock 11:1-12, 1999. Shock. 1999;12(4):323–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuimei Z, Shangli S. Physiological and proteomic responses of contrasting alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) varieties to PEG-induced osmotic stress. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter S, Buchner J. Molecular chaperones–cellular machines for protein folding. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41(7):1098–1113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Júlio CB, Carlos HIR. Protein folding assisted by chaperones. Protein Peptide Lett. 2005;12:257–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, et al. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci. 2004;9(5):244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma QL, Kang JM, Long RC, et al. Proteomic analysis of salt and osmotic-drought stress in alfalfa seedlings. J Integr Agric. 2016;15(10):2266–2278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore RS, Garg N, Garg S, et al. Starch phosphorylase: role in starch metabolism and biotechnological applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2009;29(3):214–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi A, Baker DA. The effect of water stress on the activities of key regulatory enzymes of the sucrose to starch pathway in wheat. Plant Growth Regulation. 2001;35(1):81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang ZQ, et al. Activities of starch hydrolytic enzymes and sucrose-phosphate synthase in the stems of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. J Exp Bot. 2001;52(364):2169–2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasch CM, Ott KV, Bauer H, et al. ß-amylase1 mutant arabidopsis plants show improved drought tolerance due to reduced starch breakdown in guard cells. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(19):6059–6067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JB, Hite RK, Hamdan SM, et al. DNA primase acts as a molecular brake in DNA replication. Nature. 2006;439(7076):621–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh NA, Kuchta RD. Initiation of new DNA strands by the herpes simplex virus-1 primase-helicase complex and either herpes DNA polymerase or human DNA polymerase alpha. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(3):1523–1532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck JL, Berger JM. Primus inter pares (first among equals). Nat Struct Biol. 2001;8(1):2–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta S, Agarwal VP, Gupta NK. Efficacy of putrescine and benzyladenine on photosynthesis and productivity in relation to drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2012;18(4):331–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marini F, Pellicioli A, Paciotti V, et al. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 1997;16(3):639–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria JMR, Buitink J, Van L, et al. Changes in DNA and microtubules during loss and re-establishment of desiccation tolerance in germinating Medicago truncatula seeds. J Exp Bot. 2005;56(418):2119–2130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SJ, Hong SM, Yoo SJ, et al. Post-translational regulation of flowering locus t protein in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2016;9(2):308–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notaguchi M, Daimon Y, Abe M, et al. Long-distance, graft-transmissible action of arabidopsis flowering locus t protein to promote flowering. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49(11):1645–1658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan YY, Shen LS, Chen Y, et al. A MYB-domain protein EFM mediates flowering responses to environmental cues in Arabidopsis. Dev Cell. 2014;30(4):437–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riboni M, Galbiati M, Tonelli C, et al. Gigantea enables drought escape response via abscisic acid-dependent activation of the florigens and suppressor of overexpression of constans1. Plant Physiol. 2013;162(3):1706–1719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Z, Ma X, Guo H, et al. Flower development under drought stress: morphological and transcriptomic analyses reveal acute responses and long-term acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):3785–3807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning BES, Steer MW. Plant cell biology structure and function. J Microsc. 1996;189:100–101.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Monge R, Lopez-Torrejón G, Pascual CY, et al. Vicilin and convicilin are potential major allergens from pea. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(11):1747–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lycett GW, Delauney AJ, Gatehouse JA, et al. The vicilin gene family of pea (Pisum sativum L.): a complete cdna coding sequence for preprovicilin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983;11(8):2367–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belanger FC, Kriz AL. Molecular-basis for allelic polymorphism of the maize globulin-1 gene. Genetics. 1991;129(3):863–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amor Y, Haigler CH, Johnson S, et al. A membrane-associated form of sucrose synthase and its potential role in synthesis of cellulose and callose in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(20):9353–9357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González EM, Gordon AJ, James CL, et al. The role of sucrose synthase in the response of soybean nodules to drought. J Exp Bot. 1995;46(10):1515–1523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Anderson S, Zhang Y, et al. The structure of sucrose synthase-1 from Arabidopsis thaliana and its functional implications. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(41):36108–36118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen AB, Goday A, Figueras M, et al. Phosphorylation mediates the nuclear targeting of the maize rab17 protein. Plant J. 1998;13(5):691–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riera M, Figueras M, Lopez C, et al. Protein kinase ck2 modulates developmental functions of the abscisic acid responsive protein rab17 from maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(26):9879–9884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goday A, Jensen AB, Culiáñez-Macià FA, et al. The maize abscisic acid-responsive protein Rab17 is located in the nucleus and interacts with nuclear localization signals. Plant Cell. 1994;6(3):351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilardell J, Goday A, Freire MA, et al. Gene sequence, developmental expression, and protein phosphorylation of rab-17 in maize. Plant Mol Biol. 1990;14(3):423–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras M, Pujal J, Saleh A, et al. Maize rab17 overexpression in arabidopsis plants promotes osmotic stress tolerance. Ann Applied Biol. 2004;144(3):251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CQ, Liu RX, Yang FQ, et al. Effects of drought on the sucrose metabolism of subtending leaves of cotton bolls at different fruiting branches and boll weight during flowering and bolling stages. Cotton Sci. 2014;26:452–458.
   Google Scholar
• Wardlaw IF. Interaction between drought and chronic high temperature during kernel filling in wheat in a controlled environment. Ann Bot. 2002;90(4):469–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar