Prediction of fluid responsiveness: a review

References

• Miller T, Myles P. Perioperative fluid therapy for major surgery. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(5):825–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness: an update. Ann Intensive Care. 2016;6(1):111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, et al. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2642–2647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marik P, Lemson J. Fluid responsiveness: an evolution of our understanding. Br J Anaesth. 2014;112(4):620–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecconi M, Aya HD. Central venous pressure cannot predict fluid-responsiveness. Evid Based Med. 2014;19(2):63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marik P, Cavalazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1774–1781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saugel B, Kirsche S, Hapfelmeier A, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2013;28(4):537.e1–537.e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes A, Evans L, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah P, Louis MA. 2021. Physiology, central venous pressure. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing;
   Google Scholar
• Farcy D, Jain A, Dalley M, et al. Pitfalls in using central venous pressure as a marker of fluid responsiveness. Emerg Med. 2016;48(1):18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland A, Grüne F. [Cardiac preload and central venous pressure]. Anaesthesist. 2009;58(5):506–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyton AC, Jones C, Coleman T. 1973. Circulatory physiology: cardiac output and its regulation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): W.B. Saunders Co.; p. 430–431.
   Google Scholar
• Tansey EA, Montgomery LEA, Quinn JG, et al. Understanding basic vein physiology and venous blood pressure through simple physical assessments. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(3):423–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer D, Vincent JL. Should we measure the central venous pressure to guide fluid management? Ten answers to 10 questions. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnel E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(3):691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121(6):2000–2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyre L, Breen A. Optimal volaemic status and predicting fluid responsiveness, continuing education in anaesthesia. Crit Care Pain. 2010;10(2):59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle JP, Teplick R, Long M. Respiratory variations in systolic arterial pressure as an indicator of volume status. Anesthesiology. 1983;59:A53.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Lu B, Sheng X, et al. Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Anesth. 2011;25(6):904–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teboul JL, Monnet X, Chemla D, et al. Arterial pulse pressure variation with mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(1):22–31. 1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallat Pironkov JA, Destandau M, et al. Systolic pressure variation (δdown) can guide fluid therapy during pheochromocytoma surgery. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2003;50(10):998–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, et al. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(2):200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millington SJ. Ultrasound assessment of the inferior vena cava for fluid responsiveness: easy, fun, but unlikely to be helpful. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(6):633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Xu C, Wang M, et al. Reliability of pleth variability index in predicting preload responsiveness of mechanically ventilated patients under various conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19(1):67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myatra SN, Prabu N, Divatia J, et al. The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a "tidal volume challenge" reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):415–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enev R, Abedinov F, Bakalova N, et al. Stroke volume variation is a good predictor of fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgery patients with implanted intra-arortic balloon pump (submitted for evaluation).
   Google Scholar
• Cannesson M. The “grey zone” or how to avoid the binary constraint of decision-making. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(11):1139–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care. 2014;18(6):587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michard F, Chemla D, Teboul JL. Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey?Crit Care. 2015;19:144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JJ, Gil NS, Lee JH, et al. Predictor of fluid responsiveness in the ‘grey zone’: augmented pulse pressure variation through a temporary increase in tidal volume. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(1):50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent JL, Weil MH. Fluid challenge revisited. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1333–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toscani L, Aya HD, Antonakaki D, et al. What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biais M, Courson H, Lanchon R, et al. Mini-fluid challenge of 100 ml of crystalloid predicts fluid responsiveness in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(3):450–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(12):1935–1947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina A, Dell’Anna A, Baggiani M, et al. Functional hemodynamic tests: a systematic review and a metanalysis on the reliability of end-expiratory occlusion test and of the mini-fluid challenge in predicting fluid responsiveness. Cric Care. 2019;23(1):264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monnet X, Teboul JL. M. passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid!Crit Care. 2015;19:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Runge I, et al. Central venous pressure measurements improve the accuracy of leg raising-induced change in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(6):940–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hadouti Y, Valencia L, Becerra A, et al. Echocardiography and passive leg raising in the postoperative period: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(11):748–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, et al. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:951–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saugel B, Critchley L, Kaufmann T, et al. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management. J Clin Monit Comput. 2020;34(2):207–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun S, Peeters W, Bezemer R, et al. On algorithms for calculating arterial pulse pressure variation during major surgery. Physiol Meas. 2017;38(12):2101–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derichard A, Robin E, Tavernier B, et al. Automated pulse pressure and stroke volume variations from radial artery: evaluation during major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(5):678–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argueta EE, Paniagua D. Thermodilution cardiac output: a concept over 250 years in the making. Cardiol Rev. 2019;27(3):138–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grensemann J. Cardiac output monitoring by pulse contour analysis, the technical basics of less-invasive techniques. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saugel B, Hoppe P, Nicklas JY, et al. Continuous noninvasive pulse wave analysis using finger cuff technologies for arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anesth. 2020;125(1):25–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, et al. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth. 2002;88(3):350–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhazzani W, Evans L, Alshamsi F, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines on the management of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the ICU: first update. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(3):e219–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatment for different phenotypes?Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(6):1099–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michard F, Malbrain M, Martin G, et al. Haemodynamic monitoring and management in COVID-19 intensive care patients: an international survey. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020;39(5):563–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanin A, Mostafa M. Evaluation of fluid responsiveness during COVID-19 pandemic: what are the remaining choices?J Anesth. 2020;34(5):758–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Zheng S, Zheng C, et al. Attaching clinical significance to COVID-19-associated diarrhea. Life Sci. 2020;260:118312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar