Aquaponic systems: biological and technological parameters

References

• Hendricks P. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production in southwestern Ontario. Guelph, Ontario (Canada): The University of Guelph; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Martellozzo F, Landry S, Plouffe D, et al. Urban agriculture: a global analysis of the space constraint to meet urban vegetable demand. Environ Res Lett. 2014;9(6):064025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen T, Kamstra A. The need for systems design for robust aquaponic systems in the urban environment. Acta Hortic. 2013;1004(1004):71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Love D, Fry J, Genello L, et al. An international survey of aquaponics practitioners. In PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102662–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endut A, Jusoh A, Ali N, et al. A study on the optimal hydraulic loading rate and plant ratios in recirculation aquaponic system. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(5):1511–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddek S, Espinal C, Delaide B, et al. Navigating towards decoupled aquaponic systems: a system dynamics design approach. Water MDPI. 2016;8(7):303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina M. Effect of aquafeed on productivity of red amaranth and on water quality under aquaponic cultivation [thesis]. Miami (FL): Florida International University; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Alderman S. The practicality and sustainability of aquaponic agriculture versus traditional agriculture with emphasis on application in the Middle [thesis]. San Marcos, Texas; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey D, Rakocy J, Cole W, et al. Economic analysis of a commercial-scale aquaponic system for the production of tilapia and lettuce. Fourth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture. , St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands: Agriculture Experiment Station, University of the Virgin Islands; 1997, Vol. 1. p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley P. Just beyond the eye: floating gardens in Aztec Mexico. Hist Geogr. 2004;32:112.
   Google Scholar
• Turcios A, Papenbrock J. Sustainable treatment of aquaculture effluents – what can we learn from the past for the future? Sustainability. 2014;6(2):836–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molovan I, Bala M. Analysis of aquaponic organic hydroponics from the perspective of setting costs and of maintenance on substratum and floating shelves systems. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2015;19:73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bindraban S, van der Velde M, Ye L, et al. Assessing the impact of soil degradation on food production. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 2012;4(5):478–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naegel L. Combined production of fish and plants in recirculating water. Aquaculture. 1977;10(1):17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge R, Konig B, Villarroel M, et al. Strategic points in aquaponics. Water. 2017;9(3):182–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson R. Aquaponic food production. Montello (WI): Nelson and Pade; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gosh K, Chowdhury. S. Review of aquaponics system: searching for a technically feasible and economically profitable aquaponics system. J Agric Environ Consumer Sci. 2019;19:5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Diver S, Rinehart L. Aquaponics – Integration of hydroponics with aquaculture. ATTRA. 2010;28:1–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villarroel M, Junge R, Komives T, et al. Survey of aquaponics in Europe. Water. 2016;8(10):468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnsek M, Joly A, Thorarinsdottir R, et al. Challenges of commercial aquaponics in Europe: beyond the hype. Water. 2020;12(1):306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love D, Fry J, Li X, et al. Commercial aquaponics production and profitability: findings from an international survey. Aquaculture. 2015;435:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler PR, Harper JK, Wade EM, et al. Economic analysis of an aquaponic system for the integrated production of rainbow trout and plants. Int J Recirc Aquac. 2000;1(1):15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Rakocy J, Shultz R, Bailey D, et al. Aquaponic production of tilapia and basil: comparing a batch and staggered cropping system. Acta Hortic. 2004;648(648):63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Popma T, Masser. M. Tilapia: life history and biology. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center. SRAC Publication No. 283: United States Department of agriculture. USA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Thorarinsdottir R , editor. Aquaponics guidelines. Reykjavik (Iceland): Haskolaprent, University of Iceland; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Licamele J. Biomass production and nutrient dynamics in an aquaponics system [Ph.D. thesis]. Tucson, AZ, (USA): University of Arizona; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Danner R, Mankasingh U, Anamthawat-Jonsson K, et al. Designing aquaponic production systems towards integration into greenhouse farming. Water. 2019;11(10):2123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Buzby K, Semmens K, et al. Evaluation of lettuce between spring water, hydroponic, and flow-through aquaponic systems. Int J Veg Sci. 2017;23(5):456–470.
   Google Scholar
• Buzby K, Waterland N, Semmens K, et al. Evaluating aquaponic crops in a freshwater flow-through fish culture system. Aquaculture. 2016;460:15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva L, Escalante E, Valdés-Lozano D, et al. Evaluation of a semi-intensive aquaponics system, with and without bacterial biofilter in a tropical location. Sustainability. 2017;9(4):592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloas W, Groß R, Baganz D, et al. A new concept for aquaponic systems to improve sustainability, increase productivity, and reduce environmental impacts. Aquacult Environ Interact. 2015;7(2):179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck M, Sare A, Massart S, et al. Exploring bacterial communities in aquaponic systems. Water. 2019;11(2):260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulgarelli D, Garrido-Oter R, Münch P, et al. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(3):392–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes R, Leung G, Hirkala D, et al. Isolation, selection, and characterization of beneficial rhizobacteria from pea, lentil, and chickpea grown in Western Canada. Can J Microbiol. 2008;54(4):248–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach. H. The Lysobacter genus. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E, editors. The prokaryotes. New York (NY): Springer; 2006. p. 939–957.
   Google Scholar
• Losordo T, Masser M, Rakocy J. Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems – a review of component options. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center; SRAC Publication No. 453: United States Department of agriculture. USA; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rakocy J, Masser M, Losordo. T. Recirculating aquaculture tank production systems: aquaponics- integrating fish and plant culture Southern Regional Aquaculture Center. SRAC Publication No. 454: United States Department of agriculture. USA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Trang N, Schierup H, Brix. H. Leaf vegetables for use in integrated hydroponics and aquaculture systems: effects of root flooding on growth, mineral composition and nutrient uptake. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(27):4186–4196.
   Google Scholar
• Neto R, Ostrensky A. Nutrient load estimation in the waste of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.) reared in cages in tropical climate conditions. Aquac Res. 2015;46(6):1309–1322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hafedh Y, Alam A, Beltagi M. Food production and water conservation in a recirculating aquaponic system in Saudi Arabia at different ratios of fish feed to plants. J World Aquac Soc. 2008;39(4):510–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddek S, Keesman K. The necessity of desalination technology for designing and sizing multi-loop aquaponics systems. Desalination. 2018;428:76–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaide B, Delhaye G, Dermience M, et al. Plant and fish production performance, nutrient mass balances, energy and water use of the PAFF box, a small-scale aquaponic system. Aquacult Eng. 2017;78:130–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love D, Uhl M, Genello L. Energy and water use of a small-scale raft aquaponics system in Baltimore, Maryland, United States. Aquacult Eng. 2015;68:19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supajaruwong S, Satanwat P, Pungrasmi W, et al. Design and function of a nitrogen and sediment removal system in a recirculating aquaculture system optimized for aquaponics. Environ Eng Res. 2020;26(2):190494–190490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain T, Verma AK, Tiwari VK, et al. Optimizing koi carp, Cyprinus carpio var. Koi (Linnaeus, 1758), stocking density and nutrient recycling with spinach in an aquaponic system. J World Aquacult Soc. 2014;45(6):652–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maucieri C, Nicoletto C, Zanin G, et al. Effect of stocking density of fish on water quality and growth performance of European carp and leafy vegetables in a low-tech aquaponic system. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0217561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel SR. Nitrogen transformation in engineered aquaponics with water celery (Oenanthe javanica) and koi carp (Cyprinus carpio): effects of plant to fish biomass ratio. Aquaculture. 2020;520:734971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzby K, West T, Waterland N, et al. Remediation of flow-through trout raceway effluent via aquaponics. North Am J Aquacult. 2017;79(1):53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama S, Kandel A, El-shinawy M, et al. Evaluation of mint and sweet basil herbs production integrated into the aquaponic tilapia production system. AUJASCI. Arab Univ J Agric Sci. 2020;22(2):563–573.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson J, Good C, Welsh C, et al. Comparing the effects of high vs. low nitrate on the health, performance, and welfare of juvenile rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss within water recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquacult Eng. 2014;59:30–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Monroe A, Day M. Growth, yield, plant quality and nutrition of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) under soilless agricultural systems. Ann Agric Sci. 2016;61(2):181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Stathopoulou P, Tsoumalakou E, Levizou E, et al. Iron and potassium fertilization improve rocket growth without affecting tilapia growth and histomorphology characteristics in aquaponics. Appl Sci. 2021;11(12):5681.
   Google Scholar
• Slosar M, Uher A, Andrejiova A, et al. Selected yield and qualitative parameters of broccoli in dependence on nitrogen, sulfur, and zinc fertilization. Turk J Agric For. 2016;40:465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorin E, Etienne P, Maillard A, et al . Effect of sulphur deprivation on osmotic potential components and nitrogen metabolism in oilseed rape leaves: identification of a new early indicator. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(20):6175–6189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Rauan A, Xing J, et al. Influence of dietary Se supplementation on aquaponic system: focusing on the growth performance, ornamental features and health status of koi carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Koi), production of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and water quality. Aquac Res. 2021;52(2):505–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandi A, Cristea V, Petrea S, et al. The review of existing and in-progress technologies of the different subsystems required for the structural and functional elements of the model of multi-purpose aquaponic production system. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2016;21:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddek S. Opportunities and challenges of multi-loop aquaponic systems [dissertation]. Wageningen (Netherlands): Wageningen University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nuwansi K, Verma A, Prakash C, et al. Effect of water flow rate on polyculture of koi carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Koi) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) with water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) in recirculating aquaponic system. Aquacult Int. 2016;24(1):385–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakocy J, Shultz, D. Bailey R. Commercial aquaponics for the caribbean Proceedings of the 51st Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute: Kingshill, U.S. Virgin Islands; 2000. p. 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Allen W. Growing the good food revolution. Miami (FL): University of Miami; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein S. Aquaponic gardening: a step-by-step guide to raising vegetables and fish together. Gabriola Island (Canada): New Society Publishers; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Goddek S, Delaide B, Mankasingh U, et al. Challenges of sustainable and commercial aquaponics. Sustainability. 2015;7(4):4199–4224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd C, Lichtkoppler. F. Water quality management in pond fish culture. Res Dev Seri. 1979;22(43):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Yang T, Kim. H. Effects of hydraulic loading rate on spatial and temporal water quality characteristics and crop growth and yield in aquaponic systems. Horticulturae. 2020;6(1):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil B, Summerfelt S, Libey G. Applications of ozone to recirculating aquaculture systems. Successes and failures in commercial recirculating aquaculture Proceeding from the Successes and Failures in Commercial Recirculating Aquaculture Conference. Roanoke, VA. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, 152 Riley-Robb Hall, Ithaca, New York; 1996. p. 373–389.
   Google Scholar
• Spotte S. Fish and invertebrate culture: water management in closed systems. New York (NY): Wiley; 1979. p. 145.
   Google Scholar
• Javadzadeh P, Park S, Whitworth C. Optimizing the profit of a medium scale home aquaponics system; 2019. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15448.03849
   Google Scholar
• Afolabi K. Productivity of Kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) culture in aquaponic systems [thesis]. Cairo (Egypt): The American University in Cairo; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• EIP-AGRI Focus Group on Circular Horticulture. Starting Paper: FG27 Circular horticulture. EIP-AGRI, 2017. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_fg_circular_horticulture_-starting_paper_2017_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez-Cáceres GP, Fernández-Cabanás V, Lobillo-Eguíbar J, et al. Consumers’ knowledge, attitudes and willingness to pay for aquaponic products in Spain and Latin America. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 2021;24:100350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. Sustainable aquaculture: EU supports promising aquaponics project [Internet]. European Commission, Oceans and Fisheries; [cited 2021 Oct 29]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/oceans-and-fisheries/news/sustainable-aquaculture-eu-supports-promising-aquaponics-project-2021-10-29_en
   Google Scholar
• Fruscella L, Kotzen B, Milliken S. Organic aquaponics in the European Union: towards sustainable farming practices in the framework of the new EU regulation. Rev Aquacult. 2021;13(3):1661–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miličić V, Thorarinsdottir R, Santos M, et al. Commercial aquaponics approaching the European market: to consumers’ perceptions of aquaponics products in Europe. Water. 2017;9(2):80–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsees H, Kloas W, Wuertz S. Decoupled systems on trial: eliminating bottlenecks to improve aquaponic processes. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183056–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawaha A, Wahab P, Jaafar H, et al. Effects of fish stocking density on water quality, growth performance of tilapia and yield of butterhead lettuce grown in decoupled recirculation aquaponic systems. J Ecol Eng. 2021;22(1):8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baganz G, Junge R, Portella M, et al. The aquaponic principle – It is all about coupling. Rev Aquacult. 2022;14(1):252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar