Systematic identification and characterization of the soybean (Glycine max) B-box transcription factor family

References

• Riechmann JL, Heard J, Martin G, et al. Arabidopsis transcription factors: genome-wide comparative analysis among eukaryotes. Science. 2000;290(5499):2105–2110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiełbowicz-Matuk A. Involvement of plant C2H2-type zinc finger transcription factors in stress responses. Plant Sci. 2012;185–186:78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diao WP, Snyder JC, Wang SB, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of WRKY gene family in Capsicum annuum L. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1727.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khan SA, Li MZ, Wang SM, et al. Revisiting the role of plant transcription factors in the battle against abiotic stress. IJMS. 2018;19(6):1634.
   Google Scholar
• Kumagai T, Ito S, Nakamichi N, et al. The common function of a novel subfamily of B-Box zinc finger proteins with reference to circadian-associated events in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2008;72(6):1539–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang L, Ji M, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the B-box transcription factor gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Xing M, Cai C, et al. B-box proteins in Arachis duranensis: genome-wide characterization and expression profiles analysis. Agronomy. 2019;10(1):23.
   Google Scholar
• Gangappa SN, Botto JF. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(7):460–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Wang S, Song ZT, et al. Two B-box domain proteins, BBX18 and BBX23, interact with ELF3 and regulate thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 2018;25(7):1718–1728.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Schain ND, Díaz-Mendoza M, Żurczak M, et al. Potato CONSTANS is involved in photoperiodic tuberization in a graft-transmissible manner. Plant J. 2012;70(4):678–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YS, Jeong DH, Lee DY, et al. OsCOL4 is a constitutive flowering repressor upstream of Ehd1 and downstream of OsphyB. Plant J. 2010;63(1):18–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onouchi H, Igeño MI, Périlleux C, et al. Mutagenesis of plants overexpressing CONSTANS demonstrates novel interactions among Arabidopsis flowering-time genes. Plant Cell. 2000;12(6):885–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samach A, Onouchi H, Gold SE, et al. Distinct roles of CONSTANS target genes in reproductive development of Arabidopsis. Science. 2000;288(5471):1613–1616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almada R, Cabrera N, Casaretto JA, et al. VvCO and VvCOL1, two CONSTANS homologous genes, are regulated during flower induction and dormancy in grapevine buds. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28(8):1193–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SK, Yun CH, Lee JH, et al. OsCO3, a CONSTANS-LIKE gene, controls flowering by negatively regulating the expression of FT-like genes under SD conditions in rice. Planta. 2008;228(2):355–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell. 2000;12(12):2473–2484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ma C, Xu Y, et al. A zinc finger protein regulates flowering time and abiotic stress tolerance in chrysanthemum by modulating gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(5):2038–2054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo G, Xu K, Zhang X, et al. Extensive analysis of GmFTL and GmCOL expression in Northern soybean cultivars in field conditions. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng XF, Wang ZY. Overexpression of COL9, a CONSTANS-LIKE gene, delays flowering by reducing expression of CO and FT in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005;43(5):758–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao D, Li Y, Lu S, et al. GmCOL1a and GmCOL1b function as flowering repressors in soybean under long-day conditions. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56(12):2409–2422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng Y, Jiang Y, Zhao X, et al. BBX4, a phyB-interacting and modulated regulator, directly interacts with PIF3 to fine tune red light-mediated photomorphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(51):26049–26056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Heng Y, Wang X, et al. A positive feedback loop of BBX11–BBX21–HY5 promotes photomorphogenic development in Arabidopsis. Plant Commun. 2020;1(5):100045.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin F, Jiang Y, Li J, et al. B-BOX DOMAIN PROTEIN28 negatively regulates photomorphogenesis by repressing the activity of transcription factor HY5 and undergoes COP1-mediated degradation. Plant Cell. 2018;30(9):2006–2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng Y, Lin F, Jiang Y, et al. B-Box containing proteins BBX30 and BBX31, acting downstream of HY5, negatively regulate photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2019;180(1):497–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong C, Luo D, Lin A, et al. A tomato B-box protein Sl BBX 20 modulates carotenoid biosynthesis by directly activating PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1, and is targeted for 26S proteasome-mediated degradation. New Phytol. 2019;221(1):279–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang H, Dong Y, Yue X, et al. The B-box zinc finger protein MdBBX20 integrates anthocyanin accumulation in response to ultraviolet radiation and low temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2019;42(7):2090–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai S, Saito T, Honda C, et al. An apple B-box protein, MdCOL11, is involved in UV-B-and temperature-induced anthocyanin biosynthesis. Planta. 2014;240(5):1051–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai S, Tao R, Tang Y, et al. BBX16, a B-box protein, positively regulates light-induced anthocyanin accumulation by activating MYB10 in red pear. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(10):1985–1997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippuner V, Cyert MS, Gasser CS. Two classes of plant cDNA clones differentially complement yeast calcineurin mutants and increase salt tolerance of wild-type yeast. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(22):12859–12866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka S, Takano T. Salt tolerance-related protein STO binds to a myb transcription factor homologue and confers salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2003;54(391):2231–2237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Li R, Dai Y, et al. A B-box zinc finger protein, MdBBX10, enhanced salt and drought stresses tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2019;99(4–5):437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Tu X, Zhang J, et al. Heat stress-induced BBX18 negatively regulates the thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40(3):2679–2688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takuhara Y, Kobayashi M, Suzuki S. Low-temperature-induced transcription factors in grapevine enhance cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168(9):967–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav A, Lingwan M, Yadukrishnan P, et al. BBX31 promotes hypocotyl growth, primary root elongation and UV-B tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14(5):e1588672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philis G, Gracey EO, Gansel LC, et al. Comparing the primary energy and phosphorus consumption of soybean and seaweed-based aquafeed proteins–a material and substance flow analysis. J Clean Prod. 2018;200:1142–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan J, Twardowska I, Wang S, et al. Prospective sustainable production of safe food for growing population based on the soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) crops under Cd soil contamination stress. J Clean Prod. 2019;212:22–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Yu TF, Ma J, et al. The soybean bZIP transcription factor gene GmbZIP2 confers drought and salt resistances in transgenic plants. IJMS. 2020;21(2):670.
   Google Scholar
• Wang M, Chen B, Zhou W, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the at-hook motif nuclear localized gene family in soybean. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):1–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XZ, Zheng WJ, Cao XY, et al. Genomic analysis of stress associated proteins in soybean and the role of GmSAP16 in abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis and soybean. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna R, Kronmiller B, Maszle DR, et al. The Arabidopsis B-box zinc finger family. Plant Cell. 2009;21(11):3416–3420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu Z, Wang X, Li Y, et al. Genomic organization, phylogenetic and expression analysis of the B-BOX gene family in tomato. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1552.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang J, Zhao X, Weng X, et al. The rice B-box zinc finger gene family: genomic identification, characterization, expression profiling and diurnal analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Dai J, Liu X, et al. Genome-wide and expression analysis of B-box gene family in pepper. BMC Genomics. 2021;22(1):1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X, Li R, Dai Y, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the B-box gene family in the apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) genome. Mol Genet Genomics. 2018;293(2):303–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, Huang M, Zong W, et al. Hd1, Ghd7, and DTH8 synergistically determine the rice heading date and yield-related agronomic traits. J Genet Genomics. 2022;49(5):437–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, et al. The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3784–3788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, et al. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):D1178–D1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–2739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Web Server issue):W202–W208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi PP, Moieni A, Hiraga S, et al. Organ-specific proteomic analysis of drought-stressed soybean seedlings. J Proteomics. 2012;75(6):1906–1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia B, Wang Y, Zhang D, et al. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of soybean CHYR gene family. IJMS. 2021;22(22):12192.
   Google Scholar
• Ding X, Guo J, Zhang Q, et al. Heat-responsive miRNAs participate in the regulation of male fertility stability in soybean CMS-Based F1 under high temperature stress. IJMS. 2021;22(5):2446.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Wang H, Li X, et al. Enhancement of plant cold tolerance by soybean RCC1 family gene GmTCF1a. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Zhang W, Zhang Y, et al. The roles of methyl jasmonate to stress in plants. Funct Plant Biol. 2019;46(3):197–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar