Impact of Temporality and Identifiability in Online Deliberations on Discussion Quality: An Experimental Study

REFERENCES

• Albrecht, Stephen. 2006. “Whose Voice is Heard in Online Deliberation?: A Study of Participation and Representation in Political Debates on the Internet.” Information, Community and Society 9 (1): 62–82. doi: 10.1080/13691180500519548
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, André. 2011. “Contestatory Deliberation.” Paper presented at the Epistemic Democracy Conference, Yale University, New Haven, CT, October 22.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald, and Julian Stanley. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Stephen, and Giles Moss. 2012. “Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2011.635957
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert. 1989. Demokratin och Dess Antagonister [Democracy and its critics]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. The Internet and Democratic Discourse—Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere. Information, Communication & Society 4 (4): 615–633. doi: 10.1080/13691180110097030
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Todd, and Seeta Peña Gangadharan. 2009. Online Deliberation—Design, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Todd, and Reid Chandler. 2011. “Online Deliberation Design: Choices, Criteria, and Evidence.” In Democracy in Motion. Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement, edited by T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, M. Leighninger, and G.M. Weiksner, 103–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Todd, Brendan O'Connor, Alex Cochran, Jonathan Effrat, Andrew Parker, Benjamin Newman, and Aaron Tam. 2009. “An Online Environment for Democratic Deliberation: Motivations, Principles, and Design.” In Online Deliberation. Design, Research, and Practice, edited by T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan, 275–292. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James, and Cindy Kam. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants. A Defence of the ‘Narrow Data Base’.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, edited by J. Druckman, D. Green, J. Kuklinski and A. Lupia, 41–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esterling Kevin, Michael Neblo, and David Lazer. 2011. “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed About Politics. A Deliberative Field Experiment With Members of Congress and Their Constituents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 483–503. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr001
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James. 2009. “Virtual Public Consultation: Prospect for Internet Deliberative Democracy.” In Online Deliberation. Design, Research, and Practice, edited by T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan, 23–35. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James, Robert Luskin, and Roger Jowell. 2000. “Deliberative Polling and Public Consultation.” Parliamentary Affairs 53 (4): 657–666. doi: 10.1093/pa/53.4.657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, John. 2000. “Is Face-to-face Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity.” Political Communication 17 (4): 357–361. doi: 10.1080/10584600050178960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Todd. 2009. “What's Wife Swap Got to do With it?” Doctoral Thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gribbons, Barry, and Joan Herman. 1997. “True and Quasi-experimental Designs.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 5, 14.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, Kimmo, Kim Strandberg, and Staffan Himmelroos. 2009. “The Challenge of Deliberative Democracy Online – A Comparison of Face-to-face and Virtual Experiments in Citizen Deliberation.” Information Polity 14 (3), 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, Kimmo, Maija Setälä, and Kaisa Herne. 2010. “Deliberation and Civic Virtue Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation Experiment.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 95–117. doi: 10.1017/S1755773909990245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, Davy, and Raphaël Kies. 2005. “Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 317–335. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Jakob. 2003. “Public Spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or Government-Sponsored—A Comparison.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (4): 349–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2003.00093.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahai, Surinder. 2009. “Anonymity and Counter-normative Arguments in Computer-Mediated Discussions.” Group & Organization Management 34 (4): 449–478. doi: 10.1177/1059601108330064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kies, Raphaël. 2010. Promises and Limits of Web-deliberation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leshed, Gilly. 2009. “Silencing the Clatter: Removing Anonymity from a Corporate Online Community.” In Online Deliberation. Design, Research, and Practice, edited by T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan, 243–251. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leys, Christophe, and Sandy Schumann. 2010. “A Nonparametric Method to Analyse Interactions: The Adjusted Rank Transform Test.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46 (4): 684–688. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.007
   Google Scholar
• Luskin, Robert, James Fishkin, and Shanto Iyengar. 2006. Considered Opinions on U.S. Foreign Policy: Evidence From Online and Face-to-face Deliberative Polling. California: The Center for Deliberative Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Manosevitch, Edith. 2014. “The Design of Online Deliberation: Implications for Practice, Theory and Democratic Citizenship.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (1), article 9. URL: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1325&context=jpd
   Google Scholar
• Morton, Rebecca, and Kenneth Williams. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muhlberger, Peter. 2005. “The Virtual Agora Project: A Research Design for Studying Democratic Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 1 (1): article 5. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol1/iss1/art5/
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, Na'ama. 2011. “The Loud Public: The Case of User Comments in Online News Media.” Doctoral thesis, State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. 1993. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion—Our Social Skin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, Beck. 2004. “Unchat: Democratic Solution for a Wired World.” In Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet, edited by P. Shane, 21–34. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–283. doi: 10.1177/1461444804041444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Vincent. 2009. “Citizens Deliberating Online: Theory and Some Evidence.” In Online Deliberation. Design, Research, and Practice, edited by T. Davies and S. P. Gangadharan, 37–58. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Vincent, and Jamie Capella. 2002. “Online Deliberation and Its Influence: The Electronic Dialogue Project in Campaign 2000.” IT & Society 1 (1): 303–329.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, June, and Eun-Mee Kim. 2009. “Deliberation on the Net: Lessons From a Field Experiment.” In Online Deliberation. Design, Research, and Practice, edited by T. Davies and S. P. Gangadharan, 223–232. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, David. 2005. “Does Deliberative Democracy Work?” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 49–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, Alexandra. 2004. “Hacktivism and the Future of Political Participation.2 Doctoral thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, Arthur. 2014. “Virtuous or Vitriolic: The Effect of Anonymity on Civility in Online Newspaper Reader Comment Boards.” Journalism Practice 8 (1): 18–33. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Graham, Peter John, and Patrick Sturgis. 2013. “Taking Political Engagement Online: an Experimental Analysis of Asynchronous Discussion Forums.” Political Studies 61 (4): 709–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00989.x
   Google Scholar
• Stasavage, David. 2007. “Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 59–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenberger, Marco, André Bächtiger, Markus Spröndli, and Jürg Steiner. 2003. “Measuring Political Deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index.” Comparative European Politics 2003 (1): 21–48. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110002
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, Kim, and Kimmo Grönlund. 2012. “Online Deliberation and Its Outcome – Evidence from the Virtual Polity Deliberative Experiment.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 9 (2): 167–184. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2011.637709
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, Kim, and Janne Berg. 2013. “Online Readers’ Comments – Democratic Conversation Platforms or Virtual Soapboxes?” Comunicao e Sociedade - Communication & Society 23: 132–152.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, Kim, and Kimmo Grönlund. 2013. “Online Deliberation – Theory and Practice in Virtual Mini-publics.” In Deliberative Mini-Publics – Practices, Promises, Pitfalls, edited by K. Grönlund, A. Bächtiger, and M. Setälä. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg, Kim. forthcoming. “Designing for Democracy? – An Experimental Study Comparing the Outcomes of Citizen Discussions in Online Forums to Those of a Designed Online Citizen Deliberation Venue.” European Political Science Review.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2002. “New Voices in the Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Interpersonal and Online Political Talk.” Javnost—The Public 9 (2): 23–42. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2002.11008798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2007. “Measuring Deliberation's Content: A Coding Scheme.” Journal of Public Deliberation 3 (1): Article 12. http://www.publicdeliberation.net/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1049&context=jpd
   Google Scholar
• Sundström, Mikael. 2002. “Demokratiska Avatarer [Democratic Avatars].” Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 105 (3): 214–217.
   Google Scholar
• Towne, Ben, and James Herbsleb. 2012. “Design Considerations for Online Deliberation Systems.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9 (1): 97–115. doi: 10.1080/19331681.2011.637711
   Google Scholar
• Trénel, Matthias. 2004. “Measuring the Deliberativeness of Online Discussions.” Coding Scheme 2.4 Report, Social Science Research Centrex, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Tucey, Cindy. 2010. “Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation on the Global Warming and Stem Cell Issues.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association 2010 Annual Meeting, March 31 – April 3. San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Undem, Tresa. 2001. “Factors Affecting Discussion Quality: The Effects of Group Size, Gender, and Political Heterogeneity in Online Discussion Groups.” Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• VanVoorhis, Carmen, and Betsy Morgan. 2007. “Understanding Power and Rules of Thumb for Determining Sample Sizes.” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 3 (2): 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, Kathleen. 2008. “Online Anonymity.” In The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, edited by K. Himma K and H. Tavani, 165–190. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Witschge, Tamara. 2004. “Online Deliberation: Possibilities of the Internet for Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet, edited by P. Shane, 109–122. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar