Online Deliberation and the Public Sphere: Developing a Coding Manual to Assess Deliberation in Twitter Political Networks

REFERENCES

• Batorski, Dominik, and Ilona Grzywińska. 2018. “Three Dimensions of the Public Sphere on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (3): 356–374. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai, Hal Roberts, Robert Faris, Alicia Solow-Niederman, and Bruce Etling. 2015. “Social Mobilization and the Networked Public Sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA Debate.” Political Communication 32 (4): 594–624. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.986349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borge Bravo, Rosa, Joan Balcells, and Albert Padró-Solanet. 2019. “A Model for the Analysis of Online Citizen Deliberation: Barcelona Case Study.” International Journal of Communication 13 (2019): 5671–5695.
   Google Scholar
• Borge Bravo, Rosa, and Eduardo Santamarina Sáez. 2016. “From Protest to Political Parties: Online Deliberation in New Parties in Spain.” Medijske Studije 7 (14): 104–122. doi:10.20901/ms.7.14.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, Tanja. 2010. “Digital Journalism and Online Public Spheres in South Africa.” Communication 36 (2): 265–275. doi:10.1080/02500167.2010.485374.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2008. “Life Beyond the Public Sphere: Towards a Networked Model for Political Deliberation.” Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 13 (1/2): 65–79. doi:10.3233/IP-2008-0141.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel, and Jean E. Burgess. 2011. “The Use of Twitter Hashtags in the Formation of Ad Hoc Publics.” In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik. http://www.ecprnet.eu/conferences/general_conference/reykjavik/
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig. 1992. “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere. Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought, edited by Craig Calhoun, 1–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig, ed. 1993. Habermas and the Public Sphere. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, James. 1995. “The Press, Public Opinion, and Public Discourse.” In Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, 373–402. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2008. “The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 78–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, Stephen, and Giles Moss. 2011. “Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9 (1). https://www-tandfonline-com.proxy-ub.rug.nl/doi/full/10.1080/19331681.2011.635957.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. “Computer-Mediated Communication and the Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7 (1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2004. “Net-Public Sphere Research: Beyond the ‘First Phase’.” Javnost – The Public 11: 27–43. doi:10.1080/13183222.2004.11008845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, Peter. 2012. “Reinventing Participation: Civic Agency and the Web Environment.” Geopolitics, History, and International Relations 4 (2): 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, Jodi. 2003. “Why the Net is Not a Public Sphere.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 10 (1): 95–112. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00315.
   Google Scholar
• Draucker, Fawn, and Lauren Collister. 2015. “Managing Participation Through Modal Affordances on Twitter.” Open Library of Humanities 1 (1). doi:10.16995/olh.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve Del Valle, Marc, and Rosa Borge Bravo. 2018. “Echo Chambers in Parliamentary Twitter Networks: The Catalan Case.” International Journal of Communication 12: 1715–1735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, Robert, Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Dalia Othman, and Yochai Benkler. 2015. “Score Another One for the Internet? The Role of the Networked Public Sphere in the U.S. Net Neutrality Policy Debate.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2563761, Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2563761
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, Lewis A., Thomas Hove, and Hernando Rojas. 2014. “The Networked Public Sphere.” Javnost – The Public 13 (4): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Friess, Dennis, and Christiane Eilders. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Online Deliberation Research.” Policy & Internet 7 (3): 319–339. doi:10.1002/poi3.95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimmler, Antje. 2001. “Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 27 (4): 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Greg. 2010. “Rethinking the Public/Virtual Sphere: The Problem with Participation.” New Media & Society 13 (5): 739–754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T., D. Jackson, and M. Broersma. 2016. “New Platform, Old Habits? Candidates’ Use of Twitter During the 2010 British and Dutch General Election Campaigns.” New Media & Society 18 (5): 765–783. doi:10.1177/1461444814546728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, Todd, and Tamara Witschge. 2003. “In Search of Online Deliberation: Towards a New Method for Examining the Quality of Online Discussions.” Communications 28 (2). doi:10.1515/comm.2003.012.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Todd, and Scott Wright. 2014. “Discursive Equality and Everyday Talk Online: The Impact of ‘Superparticipants’.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 625–642. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 2009. Why Deliberative Democracy? Course Book. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1515/9781400826339.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16 (4): 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, Daniel, and Jennifer Gibbs. 2013. “Social Media as a Catalyst for Online Deliberation? Exploring the Affordances of Facebook and YouTube for Political Expression.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (3): 1159–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, Carolyn M., John S. Dryzek, and Christian Hunold. 2007. “Turning Up the Heat: Partisanship in Deliberative Innovation.” Political Studies 55 (2): 362–383. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, Ole R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, Courtenay, and Susan C. Herring. 2009. “Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS "09) IEEE, edited by Ralph H. Sprague Jr., 1–10. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, Davy, and Raphaël Kies. 2005. “Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy.” Acta Politica 40 (3): 317–335. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kies, Raphaël. 2010. “Deliberative Democracy and Its Operationalization.” In Promises and Limits of Web-Deliberation, edited by Raphaël Kies, 39–63. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. doi:10.1057/9780230106376_3.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, B., Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire. 1984. “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication.” American Psychologist 39: 1123–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, Ulrike, and Uta Russmann 2015. “The Sociodemographics of Political Public Deliberation: Measuring Deliberative Quality in Different User Groups.” Communications 40 (4): 471–484. doi:10.1515/commun-2015-0017.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. “Reliability in Content Analysis.” Human Communication Research 30 (3): 411–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Tien-Tsung. 2005. “Media Effects on Political Disengagement: A Multiple-Media Approach.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 82: 416–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maia, Rousiley C. M., and Thaiane A. S. Rezende. 2016. “Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation Across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths of Political Talk.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21 (2): 121–139. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, Helen. 2019. “Rethinking Democracy with Social Media.” The Political Quarterly 90 (S1): 107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Mutsvairo, Bruce, Simon Columbus, and Iris Leijendekker. 2014. “Reconnoitering the Role of (Citizen) Journalism Ethics in the Emerging Networked Public Sphere.” Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies 35 (3): 4–22. doi:10.1080/02560054.2014.963279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2002. “The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere.” New Media & Society 4 (1): 9–27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, Terje. 2009. “The Significance of Internet Communication in Public Deliberation.” Javnost - The Public 16 (1): 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, Ian. 2015. “Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the Deliberative Quality of Online News User Comments Across Platforms.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 59 (4): 539–555. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1093482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russmann, Uta, and Ulrike Klinger. 2015. “The Sociodemographics of Political Public Deliberation: Measuring Deliberative Quality in Different User Groups.” Communications - the European Journal of Communication Research 40 (4): 471–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovsgaard, Morten, and Arjen Van Dalen. 2013. “Dodging the Gatekeepers?” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 737–756. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.783876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, Russel, and Lea Martin. 1994. “Panacea or Panopticon? The Hidden Power in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Communication Research 21 (4): 427–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandberg, Kim. 2008. “Public Deliberation Goes On-Line?” Javnost – The Public 15 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1080/13183222.2008.11008965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, Jennifer. 2007. “Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme.” Journal of Public Deliberation 3 (1): 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Anna M. Martinson. 2009. “Coherence in Political Computer-Mediated Communication: Analyzing Topic Relevance and Drift in Chat.” Discourse & Communication 3 (2): 195–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass. 2001. Republic.Com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vatikiotis, Pantelis, and Zafer F. Yörük. 2016. “Gezi Movement and the Networked Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis in Global Context.” Social Media +Society 2 (3). doi:10.1177/2056305116662184.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, Kevin, Brian Hamman, and Kjerstin Thorson. 2006. “Moderation, Response Rate, and Message Interactivity: Features of Online Communities and Their Effects on Intent to Participate.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (1): 24–41. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00313.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar