86
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Legally Speaking: Public Perception and the Fine Print of the Law

REFERENCES

  • Bebchuk, Lucian, and Richard Posner. 2006. “One-Sided Contracts in Competitive Consumer Markets.” Michigan Law Review 104: 827–836.
  • Boswell, James. 1791. The Life of Samuel Johnson. 6 Volumes. London: Charles Dilly.
  • Gilbert, Michael D. 2015. “Insincere Rules.” Virginia Law Review 101 (8): 2185–2224.
  • Gilbert, Michael D., and Sean P. Sullivan. 2019. “Insincere Evidence.” Virginia Law Review 105 (6): 1115–1176.
  • Halperin, Jean-Louis. 2011. “Law in Books and Law in Action: The Problem of Legal Change.” Maine Law Review 64 (1): 45–76.
  • Hart, H. L. A. 1949. “The Ascription of Responsibility and Rights.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 49 (1): 171–194.
  • Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Johnston, Jason Scott. 2006. “The Return of Bargain: An Economic Theory of How Standard-Form Contracts Enable Cooperative Negotiation Between Businesses and Consumers.” Michigan Law Review 104 (5): 857–898.
  • Lacey, Nicola. 2004. A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • MacCormick, Neil. 1995. “Defeasibility in Law and Logic.” In Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning, 99–117, edited by Zenon Bankowski, Ian White, and Ulrike Hahn. New York: Springer.
  • MacCormick, Neil. 2005. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Meyerson, Michael I. 1990. “The Efficient Consumer Form Contract: Law and Economics Meets the Real World.” Georgia Law Review 24: 583–627.
  • Perelman, Chaim. 1963. The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. Translated by J. Petrie. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Perelman, Chaim. 1967. Justice. New York: Random House.
  • Perelman, Chaim. 1982. The Realm of Rhetoric. Translated by William Kluback. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Perelman, Chaim. 1989. “The New Rhetoric and the Rhetoricians: Remembrances and Comments.” In The New Rhetoric of Chaim Perelman: Statement and Response, edited by R. D. Dearin, 239–251. New York: University Press of America.
  • Pinto, Robert C. 2001. Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Posner, Richard A. 2005. “The Law and Economics of Contract Interpretations.” Texas Law Review 83: 1581–1586.
  • Pound, Roscoe. 1910. “Law in Books and Law in Action.” American Law Review 44: 12–36.
  • Thagard, Paul. 2000. Coherence in Thought and Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Thagard, Paul. 2006. Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Thagard, Paul. 2012. The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Tindale, Christopher W. 2015. The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Van Eemeren, Frans, and Rob Grootendorst. 1995. “Perelman and the Fallacies.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 28: 122–133.
  • Walton, Douglas. 2002. Legal Argumentation and Evidence. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Walton, Douglas. 2008. Witness Testimony Evidence: Argumentation, Artificial Intelligence, and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Walton, Douglas, Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno. 2008. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

CASES CITED

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.