The Datatext: A Multilevel-discursive Theory For Improved Public Health Data Visualizations

REFERENCES

• Aldrich, Virgil. 1968. “Visual Metaphor.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 2 (1): 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, Virgil. 1971. “Form in Visual Arts.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 11 (3): 215–226.
   Google Scholar
• Ball-Rokeach, Sandra, and Melvin DeFleur. 1976. “A Dependency Model of Mass-Media Effects.” Communication Research 3 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Karin. 1992. “Photojournalism and the Tabloid Press.” In Journalism and Popular Culture, edited by P. Dahlgren, and C. Sparks, 130–153. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, Carl @CT_Bergstrom. 2020. “1. A very short thread on the power of data graphics and scientific communication. Roughly a week ago, some very smart person* sat down, drew this graph, and saved lives. (*It's 2 AM. Without an economist subscription, I can't quickly discover whom. Maybe someone can help.)” Twitter, Mar 6, 2020. https://twitter.com/CT_Bergstrom/status/1235865328074153986.
   Google Scholar
• Bertin, Jacques. 1983 [1965]. In Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Translated by W. J. Berg. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borkin, Michelle, Azalea Vo, Zoya Bylinskii, Phillip Isola, Shashank Sunkavalli, Aude Oliva, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2013. “What Makes a Visualization Memorable?” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19 (12): 2306–2315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, Charles L., and Daniel C. Hallin. 2007. “Biocommunicability: The Neoliberal Subject and its Contradictions in News Coverage of Health Issues.” Social Text 25 (4): 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, Charles, and Daniel Hallin. 2010. “Health Reporting as Political Reporting: Biocommunicability and the Public Sphere.” Journalism 11 (2): 149–165.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, Willard. 1939. Graphic Presentation. New York: Brinton Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cairo, Alberto. 2012. The Functional Art: An Introduction to Information Graphics and Visualization. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Cairo, Alberto. 2016. The Truthful Art: Data, Charts, and Maps for Communication. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, James. 2008. Communication as Culture, Revised Edition: Essays on Media and Society. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, Ernst. 1944. “The Concept of Group and the Theory of Perception.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (1): 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chizlett, Clive. 1992. “Damned Lies. And Statistics. Otto Neurath and Soviet Propaganda in the 1930s.” Visible Language 26 (3): 298–321.
   Google Scholar
• Conboy, Martin. 2002. The Press and Popular Culture. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, Marcel. 1995. “The Iconicity of Metaphor.” In Syntactic Iconicity and Linguistic Freezes: The Human Dimension, edited by Marge E. Landsberg, 265–284. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• De Foville, Achille-louis. 1887. “The Abuse of Statistics.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 50 (4): 703–708.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John, and Sidney Hook. (1916) 2008. The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 9, 1899–1924: Democracy and Education, 1916. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, Murray. 2014. “Interactive Infographics and News Values.” Digital Journalism 2 (4): 490–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, Murray. 2015. “Just Fancy That: An Analysis of Infographic Propaganda in The Daily Express, 1956–1959.” Journalism Studies 16 (2): 152–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick, Murray. 2017. “Developments in Infographics.” In The Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited by Bob Franklin, and Stuart Eldridge, 498–508. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, Murray. 2020. The Infographic: A History of Data Graphics in News and Communications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, Umberto. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics Advances in Semiotics. London: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerlin, Angela, Catharine Wang, and Peter Ubel. 2005. “Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People’s Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics?” Medical Decision Making 25 (4): 398–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Robin. 2014. “Visual Research Data: An Infographics Primer.” Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de L'Association des Bibliothèques de la Santé du Canada 3 (5): 147–150.
   Google Scholar
• Few, Stephen. 2010. “Unit Charts Are For Kidds.” Accessed November 15 2021. https://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intelligence/unit_charts_are_for_kids.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, Martin, and Joseph Cappella. 2006. “The Role of Theory in Developing Effective Health Communications.” Journal of Communication 56 (1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendly, Michael. 2006. “Milestones in the History of Data Visualization: A Case Study in Statistical Historiography.” In Classification—the Ubiquitous Challenge, edited by Claus Weihs, and Wolfgang A. Gaul, 34–52. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Friendly, Michael. 2008a. “The Golden Age of Statistical Graphics.” Statistical Science 23 (4): 502–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friendly, Michael. 2008b. “A Brief History of Data Visualization.” In Handbook of Data Visualization, edited by C. Chen, W. K. Härdle, and M. Friendly, 15–56. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Funkhouser, Howard G. 1937. “Historical Development of the Graphical Representation of Statistical Data.” Osiris 3: 269–404.
   Google Scholar
• Galesic, Mirta, Rocio Garcia-Retamero, and Gerd Gigerenzer. 2009. “Using Icon Arrays to Communicate Medical Risks: Overcoming low Numeracy.” Health Psychology 28 (2): 210–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Edward. 1976. Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, Orit. 2015. Beautiful Data. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haroz, S., R. Kosara, and S. L. Franconeri. 2015. “Isotype Visualization: Working Memory, Performance, and Engagement with Pictographs.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1191-1200, IEEE Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, John. 1996. Popular Reality: Journalism, Modernity, Popular Culture. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, Sarah, Brian Zikmund-Fisher, Peter Ubel, Aleksandra Jancovic, Todd Lucas, and Angela Fagerlin. 2008. “The Impact of the Format of Graphical Presentation on Health-Related Knowledge and Treatment Choices.” Patient Education and Counseling 73 (3): 448–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazaparu, M. A. 2015. “Phatic Uses of Language in Print Media Discourse: Designing a New Model for Reader Engagement.” Journal of Humanistic and Social Studies 6 (1): 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2020. “Profile of the Epidemic under Different Approaches.” Press Briefing, 10 Downing St., 12 March. Accessed 15 November 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/HM-Government-Profile-of-the-Epidemic-under-Different-Approaches-Press-Briefing-10_fig1_347707836.
   Google Scholar
• Holly, Werner. 2008. “Tabloidisation of Political Communication in the Public Sphere.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere Vol. 4, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 317–341. London: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Isola, Philip, Jianxiong Xiao, Antonio Torralba, and Aude Oliva. 2011. “What Makes an Image Memorable?” Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR, IEEE Conference, 145-152.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, John. 2015. “Information Graphics and Intuition Heuristics as a Techne for Visualization.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 29 (3): 284–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jowett, Garth, and Victoria O’Donnell. 2014 [1986]. Propaganda and Persuasion. Sixth Edition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Helen. 2020. “Simple Data Visualisations Have Become Key To Communicating About The COVID-19 Pandemic, But We Know Little About Their Impact.” LSE Impact of Social Sciences blog. [Accessed 26 July 2021]. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2020/05/04/simple-data-visualisations-have-become-key-to-communicating-about-the-covid-19-pandemic-but-we-know-little-about-their-impact/.
   Google Scholar
• Klapper, Joseph. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuter, Matthew, and Ricardo Wray. 2003. “Tailored and Targeted Health Communication: Strategies for Enhancing Information Relevance.” American Journal of Health Behavior 27 (1): 227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McChesney, Robert. 2007. Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, Katherine. 2000. “Information and Persuasion: Rivals or Partners?” Design Issues 16 (3): 80–83.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, Sally Engle. 2021. The Seductions of Quantification. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T. 1995. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Wendy, Valerie F Reyna, Angela Fagerlin, Isaac Lipkus, and Ellen Peters. 2008. “Clinical Implications of Numeracy: Theory and Practice.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35 (3): 261–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurath, Otto. 1944. “The Human Approach to Visual Education.” Health Education Journal 2 (2): 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolow, Sybilla, and Lars Bluma. 2008. “Science Images Between Scientific Fields and the Public Sphere. A Historiographical Survey.” In Science Images and Popular Images of the Sciences Vol. 8, edited by Bernd Hüppauf, and Peter Weingart, 33–51. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizzi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Barbara, and Edward McQuarrie. 2004. “Beyond Visual Metaphor: A New Typology of Visual Rhetoric in Advertising.” Marketing Theory 41 (2): 113–136.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health England. 2020. “Population Pyramid of Cases.” The Weekly Surveillance Report in England, week: 16 April 2020 to 22 April 2020. Accessed 15 November 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/880848/COVID19_Weekly_Report_22_April.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Randev, Divya. 2014. “The Nature of Tabloidized Content in Newspapers: An Overview.” IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science IOSR-JHSS 19 (4): 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, James, Mark Pilling, and T. M. Marteau. 2018. “Communicating Quantitative Evidence of Policy Effectiveness and Support for the Policy: Three Experimental Studies.” Social Science and Medicine 21 (8): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Risch, John. 2008. “On the Role of Metaphor in Information Visualization.”‘ arXiv preprint https://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.0884.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Romano, Alessandro, Chiara Sotis, Goran Dominioni, and Sebastián Guidi. 2020. “The Public Do Not Understand Logarithmic Graphs Used to Portray COVID-19.” LSE COVID-19 Blog post, May 19. Accessed 15 November 2021. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/covid19/2020/05/19/the-public-doesnt-understand-logarithmic-graphs-often-used-to-portray-covid-19/.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, David. 2009. “Tabloidization of News.” In The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, edited by Stuart Allan, 350–361. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, Colin. 2000. “Introduction: The Panic Over Tabloid News.” In Tabloid Tales: Global Debates Over Media Standards, edited by C. Sparks, and J. Tulloch, 1–40. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, Alan, Terri Voepel-Lewis, Brian Zikmund-Fisher, and Angela Fagerlin. 2010b. “Presenting Research Risks and Benefits to Parents: Does Format Matter?” Anesthesia and Analgesia 11 (13): 718–723.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, Alan, Brian Zikmund-Fisher, Angela Fagerlin, and Terri Voepel-Lewis. 2010a. “The Effect of Format on Parents’ Understanding of the Risks and Benefits of Clinical Research: A Comparison Between Text, Tables, and Graphics.” Journal of Health Communication 15 (5): 487–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, Silvan. 1984. “Affect Theory.” Approaches to Emotion 16 (3): 163–195.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, Edward. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufte, Edward. 1997. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Graeme. 1999. “Tabloidization, Journalism and the Possibility of Critique.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 2 (1): 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in Judgments Reveal Some Heuristics of Thinking Under Uncertainty.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer, Howard. 2006. Graphic Discovery: A Trout in the Milk and Other Visual Adventures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Sue. 2019. “Effective Antimicrobial Resistance Communication: The Role of Information Design.” Palgrave Communications 5 (24): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wardle, Claire, and Hossein Derakhshan. 2018. “Thinking About ‘Information Disorder’: Formats of Misinformation, Disinformation, and Mal-Information.” In Journalism, ‘Fake News’ and Disinformation, edited by Cherilyn Ireton, and Julie Posetti, 43–54. Paris: Unesco.
   Google Scholar
• Wernimont, Jacqueline. 2019. Numbered Lives: Life and Death in Quantum Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wihbey, John. 2015. ‘Understanding What Makes a Visualization Memorable.’ Storybench. Accessed 15 November 2021. https://www.storybench.org/understanding-what-makes-a-visualization-memorable/.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Scott. 2008. “Language, Communication and the Public Sphere: Definitions.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere Vol. 4, edited by Ruth Wodak, and Veronika Koller, 21–43. London: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar