Knowledge on Stage: Public Roles of Scientists In Times of Communicative Abundance

REFERENCES

• Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Martin W., Petra Pansegrau, and Rajesh Shukla. 2019. The Cultural Authority of Science: Comparing Across Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich, and Inc NetLibrary. 1992. Risk Society Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai, Robert Faris, and Hal Roberts. 2018. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Lance, and Steven Linvingston. 2021. The Disinformation Age. New York: Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Billinger, Stephan, and Maciej Workiewicz. 2019. “Fading Hierarchies and the Emergence of New Forms of Organization.” Journal of Organization Design 8: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Biroli, Flávia, Maria das Dores Machado, and Juan Marco Vaggione. 2020. Gênero, Neoconservadorismo e Democracia: Disputas e Retrocessos na América Latina. São Paulo: Boitempo.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Jason. 2016. Against Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brummette, John, et al. 2018. “Read All About It: The Politicization of ‘Fake News’ on Twitter.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95 (2): 497–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Translated by Graham Burchell. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardon, Dominique. 2012. A Democracia Internet – Promessas e Limites. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense.
   Google Scholar
• Castelfranchi, Yurij, and María Eugenia Fazio. 2021. “Comunicación de la ciencia en América Latina: construir derechos, catalizar ciudadanía.” In El Estado De La Ciencia. Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos / Interamericanos. Montevideo: RICYT. http://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ElEstadoDeLaCiencia_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Castelfranchi, Yurij, Elaine Meire Vilela, Luciana Barreto de Lima, Ildeu de Castro Moreira, and Luisa Massarani. 2013. “Brazilian Opinions About Science and Technology: The ‘Paradox’ of the Relation Between Information and Attitudes.” História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 20 (suppl 1): 1163–1183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cesarino, Letícia. 2020. “How Social Media Affords Populist Politics: Remarks on Liminality on the Brazilian Case.” Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada 59 (1): 404–427.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2009. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Ned, and Doug Nethercut. 2005. “Citizens Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People.” In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century”, edited by John Gastil and Peter Levine, 111–119. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• De keersmaecker, Jonas, and Arne Roets. 2017. “‘Fake News’: Incorrect, but Hard to Correct. The Role of Cognitive Ability on the Impact of False Information on Social Impressions.” Intelligence 65: 107–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, Gil. 2019. The Crisis of Expertise. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Frank. 2015. “In Pursuit of Usable Knowledge: Critical Policy Analysis and the Argumentative Turn.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by Frank Fischer, Douglas Torgerson, Anna Durnova, and Michael Orsini, 47–66. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (7): 739–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, Paolo. 2018. “Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity?” Media, Culture & Society 40 (5): 745–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, Tarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kirsten Foot, 167–193. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodell, Rae. 1977. “The Visible Scientists.” The Sciences 17 (1): 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, Jane, and Steven Miller. 2000. Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, Mingyi. 2019. “Social Media Celebrity and the Institutionalization of YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 25 (3): 534–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41: 223–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan. 2012. “Ideology, Motivated Reasoning, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study.” Judgment and Decision Making 8: 407–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, John. 2013. Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, John. 2020. The New Despotism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, Andrew. 2007. The Cult of the Amateur. How Today’s Internet Is Killing Our Culture. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, David O., and Joshua R Wueller. 2017. “Fake News: A Legal Perspective.” Internet Law 20 (10): 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2003. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, David, et al. 2018. “The Science of Fake News.” Science 359 (6380): 1094–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meirelles, Pedro. 2020. Principais vozes da ciência no Twitter: Mapeando a conversa de cientistas e especialistas sobre a COVID-19. Report. Brasília: Instituto Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Análise de Dados (IBPAD).
   Google Scholar
• Mendonca, Ricardo F., and Márcio Bustamante. 2020. “Back to the Future: Changing Repertoire in Contemporary Protests.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 39: 629–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonça, Ricardo F., and Cristiane B. Bernardes. 2022 (forthcoming). “Crise Epistêmica e Democracia: Amadores, Especialistas e o Deslocamento dos Campos Bourdiesianos.” In Participação, Ativismos e Desdemocratização, edited by Débora Almeida, Luciana Tatagiba, Adrian Gurza Lavalle, and Marcelo Kunrath. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça, Ricardo Fabrino, Selen A Ercan, and Hans Asenbaum. 2020. “More Than Words: A Multidimensional Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Studies, 70, 1: 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, Dorothy. 1995. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. Rev. ed. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Tom. 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. 2011. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke Jr, Roger. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polino, Carmelo, and Yurij Castelfranchi. 2012. “The ‘Communicative Turn’ in Contemporary Techno-Science: Latin American Approaches and Global Tendencies.” In Science Communication in the World, edited by Bernard Schiele, Michel Claessens, and Shunke Shi, 3–17. Netherlands: Springer. http://link.springer.com/chapter/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4279-6_1.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, Julio, André Correia, Fabrício Murai, Adriana Veloso, and Fabrício Benevenuto. 2019. “Supervised Learning for Fake News Detection.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 34: 76–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, Nancy, and Russell Muirhead. 2020. A Lot of People Are Saying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simoes, Paula. 2019. “Celebridade.” Rumores 13: 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2017. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talisse, Robert. 2020. Overdoing Democracy: Why We Must Put Politics in Its Place. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, Sidney. 2013. The Language of Contention. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. Me the People: How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, Joseph. 2020. Conspiracy Theories: A Primer. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, Nathan, Jonathan Cohen, R. Lance Holbert, and Yasmin Morag. 2020. “Fact-Checking: A Meta-Analysis of What Works and for Whom.” Political Communication 37 (3): 350–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, edited by Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski, and Brian Wynneby, 44–83. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ziman, John M. 2000. Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar