How do English-Speaking Users Discuss the Wuhan Lockdown: A Longitudinal Analysis of Public Spheres on YouTube

REFERENCES

• Australian Strategic Policy Institute. 2020. “Covid-19 Disinformation & Social Media Manipulation.” September 29, 2020. https://www.aspi.org.au/report/covid-19-disinformation.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1993. Toward a Philosophy of the Act. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, James. 2004. “Expanding Dialogue: The Internet, the Public Sphere and Prospects for Transnational Democracy.” The Sociological Review 52 (1 – suppl): 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00477.x.
   Google Scholar
• Boon-Itt, Sakun, and Yukolpat Skunkan. 2020. “Public Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.” JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 6 (4): e21978. https://doi.org/10.2196/21978.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2019a. Are Filter Bubbles Real? Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2019b. “Filter Bubble.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butsch, Richard. 2007. Media and Public Spheres. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, Manuel. 2008. “The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616 (1): 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207311877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmiel, Anna, Pawel Sobkowicz, Julian Sienkiewicz, Georgios Paltoglou, Kevan Buckley, Mike Thelwall, and Janusz A. Hołyst. 2011. “Negative Emotions Boost User Activity at BBC Forum.” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 390 (16): 2936–2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.03.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, edited by A. Hamlin and B. Pettit, 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, Elizabeth, and Grant Blank. 2018. “The Echo Chamber Is Overstated: The Moderating Effect of Political Interest and Diverse Media.” Information, Communication & Society 21 (5): 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin, Matthew S. 2001. “Credibility Assessments of Online Health Information: The Effects of Source Expertise and Knowledge of Content.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6 (4). https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-11081-001.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Claude. (1998) 2002. The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26:56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 2007. “Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World.” Theory, Culture & Society 24 (4): 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407080090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, Ilana. 2010. “Bruno Latour (1947–).” In From Agamben to Žižek, edited by J. Simons, 161–176. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. (1962) 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translate by B. Thomas and L. Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16:411–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haim, Mario, Andreas Graefe, and Hans-Bernd Brosius. 2018. “Burst of the Filter Bubble? Effects of Personalization on the Diversity of Google News.” Digital Journalism 6 (3): 330–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochuli, Alex, and George Hoare. 2021. The End of the End of History: Politics in the Twenty-First Century. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, Clayton, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. “Vader: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text.” Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 8 (1): 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Joas, Hans. 2009. Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures. Translated by A. Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaluža, Jernej. 2022. “Habitual Generation of Filter Bubbles: Why is Algorithmic Personalisation Problematic for the Democratic Public Sphere?” Javnost – The Public 29 (3): 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.2003052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. 2020. “The Tragic Romance of the Nostalgic Western Liberal.” Foreign Policy. Last modified August 15, 2020. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/15/the-tragic-romance-of-the-middle-aged-western-liberal.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2018. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik or How to Make Things Public.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour and P. Weibel, 4–33. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2013. On Not Joining the Dots. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTvbK10ABPI.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann, Walter. (1927) 1993. The Phantom Public. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medaglia, Rony, and Yang Yang. 2017. “Online Public Deliberation in China: Evolution of Interaction Patterns and Network Homophily in the Tianya Discussion Forum.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (5): 733–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1203974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monselise, Michal, Chia-Hsuan Chang, Gustavo Ferreira, Rita Yang, and Christopher C. Yang. 2021. “Topics and Sentiments of Public Concerns Regarding COVID-19 Vaccines: Social Media Trend Analysis.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 23 (10): e30765. https://doi.org/10.2196/30765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa, Mohamed M. 2019. “Clustering Halal Food Consumers: A Twitter Sentiment Analysis.” International Journal of Market Research 61 (3): 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318771451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research (Prospects for Democracy) 66 (3): 745–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nip, Joyce Y., and Chao Sun. 2018. “China’s News Media Tweeting, Competing with US Sources.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 13 (1): 98–122. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Mahony, Patrick. 2021. “Habermas and the Public Sphere: Rethinking a Key Theoretical Concept.” European Journal of Social Theory 24 (4): 485–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2016. “Affective Publics and Structures of Storytelling: Sentiment, Events and Mediality.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (3): 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauchfleisch, Adrian, Daniel Vogler, and Mark Eisenegger. 2021. “Public Sphere in Crisis Mode: How the Covid-19 Pandemic Influenced Public Discourse and User Behaviour in the Swiss Twitter-Sphere.” Javnost – The Public 28 (2): 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2021.1923622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repucci, Sarah, and Amy Slipowitz. 2020. “Democracy under Lockdown: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Global Struggle for Freedom.” Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-report/2020/democracy-under-lockdown.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Samuel C. 2022. “Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to be Less Critical of Political Misinformation.” Political Communication 39 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, Dipti, Munish Sabharwal, Vinay Goyal, and Mohit Vij. 2020. “Sentiment Analysis Techniques for Social Media Data: A Review.” Paper presented at the first international conference on sustainable technologies for computational intelligence: proceedings of ICTSCI 2019, 75–90. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Siles, Ignacio, Johan Espinoza-Rojas, Adrián Naranjo, and María Fernanda Tristán. 2019. “The Mutual Domestication of Users and Algorithmic Recommendations on Netflix.” Communication, Culture & Critique 12 (4): 499–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobkowicz, Pawel, and Antoni Sobkowicz. 2011. “Hate Networks Revisited: Time and User Interface Dependence Study of User Emotions in Political Forum.” Physics and Society. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.3275
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, Colin. 2001. “The Internet and the Global Public Sphere.” In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, edited by W. L. Bennett and R. M. Entman, 75–95. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Splichal, Slavko. 2022a. Datafication of Public Opinion and the Public Sphere: How Extraction Replaced Expression of Opinion. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Splichal, Slavko. 2022b. “In Data We (Don't) Trust: The Public Adrift in Data-Driven Public Opinion Models.” Big Data & Society 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221097319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, Paul. 2021. “The Relational Public.” Sociological Theory 39 (2): 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/07352751211004660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60:556–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01497.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Dan. 2021. Review of the Book the End of the End of History: Politics in the Twenty-First Century, by Hochuli, Alex, and George Hoare. Winchester, Hampshire: John Hunt Publishing. Accessed September 7, 2021. https://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviews/19588_the-end-of-the-end-of-history-politics-in-the-twenty-first-century-by-alex-hochuli-george-hoare-and-philip-cunliffe-reviewed-by-dan-taylor/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Atteveldt, Wouter, Mariken ACG Van der Velden, and Mark Boukes. 2021. “The Validity of Sentiment Analysis: Comparing Manual Annotation, Crowd-Coding, Dictionary Approaches, and Machine Learning Algorithms.” Communication Methods and Measures 15 (2): 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1869198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkmer, Ingrid. 2003. “The Global Network Society and the Global Public Sphere.” Development 46 (1): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1011637003046001566.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2020. “WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard.” https://covid19.who.int/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIkfac5-6N7AIVVz5gCh3R-QbLEAAYASAAEgKF2fD_BwE.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Xuanzi. 2022. Online News-Prompted Public Spheres in China. London: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar