Mediatisation in Twitter: an exploratory analysis of the 2015 Spanish general election

References

• Ambrosini, L., and G. Nicolò. 2017. “Comparative Study of Neural Models for the COSET Shared Task at IberEval 2017.” In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2017) Co-located with 33th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2017), Murcia, Spain, September 19, 2017, edited by R. Martínez, J. Gonzalo, P. Rosso, S. Montalvo, and J. Carrillo-de-Albornoz, 20–27. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1881/COSET_paper_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Antonakaki, D., D. Spiliotopoulos, C. V. Samaras, P. Pratikakis, S. Ioannidis, and P. Fragopoulou. 2017. “Social Media Analysis During Political Turbulence.” PLoS ONE 12 (10): e0186836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. 2015. “Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data.” Political Analysis 23 (1): 76–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomé, G., S. Lecheler, and C. de Vreese. 2018. “Towards A Typology of Conflict Frames.” Journalism Studies 19 (12): 1689–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batrinca, B., and P. C. Treleaven. 2015. “Social Media Analytics: A Survey of Techniques, Tools and Platforms.” AI and Society 30 (1): 89–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviera, T., A. Peris, and L. Cano-Orón. 2019. “Political Candidates in Infotainment Programmes and Their Emotional Effects on Twitter: An Analysis of the 2015 Spanish General Elections pre-Campaign Season.” Contemporary Social Science 14 (1): 144–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, J. G., and D. Kavanagh. 1999. “The Third age of Political Communication: Influences and Features.” Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bor, S. E. 2014. “Using Social Network Sites to Improve Communication Between Political Campaigns and Citizens in the 2012 Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 58 (9): 1195–1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants, K., and P. Neijens. 1998. “The Infotainment of Politics.” Political Communication 15 (2): 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnap, P., R. Gibson, L. Sloan, R. Southern, and M. Williams. 2016. “140 Characters to Victory?: Using Twitter to Predict the UK 2015 General Election.” Electoral Studies 41: 230–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos-Domínguez, E. 2017. “Twitter y la Comunicación Política.” El Profesional de la Información 26 (5): 785–794.
   Google Scholar
• Campos-Domínguez, E., and D. Calvo. 2017. “La campaña electoral en Internet: planificación, repercusión y viralización en Twitter durante las elecciones españolas de 2015.” Comunicación y Sociedad 29: 93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2009. Communication Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ceron, A., and S. Splendore. 2018. “From Contents to Comments: Social TV and Perceived Pluralism in Political Talk Shows.” New Media & Society 20 (2): 659–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, M. D., J. Ratkiewicz, M. Francisco, B. Gonçalves, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2011. “Political Polarization on Twitter.” Proceedings of the Fifth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, B. A., K. Kenski, and D. Wang. 2015. “The Rise of Twitter in the Political Campaign: Searching for Intermedia Agenda-Setting Effects in the Presidential Primary.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20: 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and A. Hepp. 2013. “Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments.” Communication Theory 23 (3): 191–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dader, J. L., and E. Campos-Domínguez, eds. 2017. La Búsqueda Digital del Voto. Cibercampañas Electorales en España 2015–16. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
   Google Scholar
• Dang-Xuan, L., S. Stieglitz, J. Wladarsch, and C. Neuberger. 2013. “An Investigation of Influentials and the Role of Sentiment in Political Communication on Twitter During Election Periods.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 795–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Peña Sarracén, G.L. 2017. “Ensembles of Methods for Tweet Topic Classification.” In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2017) Co-located with 33th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2017), Murcia, Spain, September 19, 2017, edited by R. Martínez, J. Gonzalo, P. Rosso, S. Montalvo, and J. Carrillo-de-Albornoz, 15–19. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1881/COSET_paper_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Caprini, M. X., and B. A. Williams. 2001. “Let Us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Age.” In Mediated Politics: Communication in the Future of Democracy, edited by W. L. Bennet, and R. M. Entman, 160–181. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’heer, E., and P. Verdegem. 2014. “Conversations About the Elections on Twitter: Towards a Structural Understanding of Twitter’s Relation with the Political and the Media Field.” European Journal of Communication 29 (6): 720–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Parra, I., and J. Jover-Báez. 2016. “Social Movements in Crisis? From the 15-M Movement to the Electoral Shift in Spain.” The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 36 (9/10): 680–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGrazia, J., K. McKelvey, J. Bollen, and F. Rojas. 2013. “More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior.” PLOS ONE 8 (11): e79449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, M. 2016. “Social Media and the Social Sciences: How Researchers Employ Big Data Analytics.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenoll, V., and L. Cano-Orón. 2017. “Citizen Engagement on Spanish Political Parties’ Facebook Pages: Analysis of the 2015 Electoral Campaign Comments.” Comunicación y Sociedad 30 (4): 131–145.
   Google Scholar
• Filer, T., and R. Fredheim. 2017. “Popular with the Robots: Accusation and Automation in the Argentine Presidential Elections, 2015.” International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 30 (3): 259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemann, N. O. 2014. “Digitization.” In Mediatization of Communication, edited by K. Lundby, 297–321. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., and D. Karpf. 2015. “Of Big Birds and Bayonets: Hybrid Twitter Interactivity in the 2012 Presidential Debates.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (4): 390–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giglietto, F., and D. Selva. 2014. “Second Screen and Participation: A Content Analysis on a Full Season Dataset of Tweets.” Journal of Communication 64 (2): 260–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., V. Garcia-Perdomo, and S. C. McGregor. 2015. “What Is Second Screening? Exploring Motivations of Second Screen Use and Its Effect on Online Political Participation.” Journal of Communication 65 (5): 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giménez, M., T. Baviera, G. Llorca, J. Gámir, D. Calvo, P. Rosso, and F. Rangel. 2017. “Overview of the 1st Classification of Spanish Election Tweets Task at IberEval 2017.” In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2017) Co-located with 33th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2017), Murcia, Spain, September 19, 2017, edited by R. Martínez, J. Gonzalo, P. Rosso, S. Montalvo, and J. Carrillo-de-Albornoz, 1–14. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1881/Overview2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• González, J.-Á., F. Pla, and L.-F. Hurtado. 2017. “ELiRF-UPV at IberEval 2017: Classification Of Spanish Election Tweets (COSET).” In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2017) Co-located with 33th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2017), Murcia, Spain, September 19, 2017, edited by R. Martínez, J. Gonzalo, P. Rosso, S. Montalvo, and J. Carrillo-de-Albornoz, 55–60. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Worshop Proceedings http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1881/COSET_paper_7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., P. Mancini, and G. Mazzoleni. 1985. Giugno 1983: Una campagna elettorale. Turín: ERI.
   Google Scholar
• Grover, P., A. K. Kar, Y. K. Dwivedi, and M. Janssen. 2019. “Polarization and Acculturation in US Election 2016 Outcomes – Can Twitter Analytics Predict Changes in Voting Preferences.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145: 438–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Solé, F., B. Corominas-Murtra, and H. Lopez-Gonzalez. 2014. “Pacts with Twitter. Predicting Voters’ Indecision and Preferences for Coalitions in Multiparty Systems.” Information, Communication & Society 17 (10): 1280–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., and C. J. Vargo. 2015. “The Power of Message Networks: A Big-Data Analysis of the Network Agenda Setting Model and Issue Ownership.” Mass Communication and Society 18 (5): 557–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, J., J. B. Houston, and M. S. McKinney. 2013. “Live-Tweeting a Presidential Primary Debate: Exploring New Political Conversations.” Social Science Computer Review 31 (5): 552–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., and H. Liu. 2012. “Text Analytics in Social Media.” In Mining Text Data, edited by C. C. Aggarwal, and C. Zhai, 385–414. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and N. Spierings. 2016. “Saturation or Maturation? The Diffusion of Twitter and its Impact on Preference Voting in the Dutch General Elections of 2010 and 2012.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. B. 2013. “Definitive and Sensitizing Conceptualizations of Mediatization.” Communication Theory 23 (3): 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2014. “The Logic of Political Coverage on Twitter: Temporal Dynamics and Content.” Journal of Communication 64 (2): 239–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2015. Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data: The Role of Twitter Messages in Social Science Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2016. “Twitter use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., H. Schoen, O. Posegga, and P. Jürgens. 2017. “Digital Trace Data in the Study of Public Opinion: An Indicator of Attention Toward Politics Rather Than Political Support.” Social Science Computer Review 35 (3): 336–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsnes, B., A. H. Krumsvik, and T. Storsul. 2014. “Social Media as a Political Backchannel.” Aslib Journal of Information Management 66 (3): 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khandelwal, A., S. Swami, S. S. Akhtar, and M. Shrivastava. 2017. “Classification of Spanish Election Tweets (COSET) 2017 : Classifying Tweets Using Character and Word Level Features.” In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2017) Co-located with 33th Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN 2017), Murcia, Spain, September 19, 2017, edited by R. Martínez, J. Gonzalo, P. Rosso, S. Montalvo, and J. Carrillo-de-Albornoz, 49–54. Aachen, Germany: CEUR Workshop Proceedings http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1881/COSET_paper_6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., and J. Svensson. 2015. “The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach.” New Media & Society 17 (8): 1241–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzke, N. 2017. “The #BTW17 Twitter Dataset–Recorded Tweets of the Federal Election Campaigns of 2017 for the 19th German Bundestag.” Data 2 (34): 19.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiss, D. 2012. Taking Our Country Back: The Crafting of Networked Politics From Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. 2013. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S. 2014. “How Political Candidates use Twitter and the Impact on Votes.” Computers in Human Behavior 34: 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., D. Palsetia, R. Narayanan, M. M. A. Patwary, A. Agrawal, and A. Choudhary. 2011. “Twitter Trending Topic Classification.” In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, 251–258. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• López-García, G. 2016. “‘New’ vs ‘Old’ Leaderships: the Campaign of Spanish General Elections 2015 on Twitter.” Communication & Society 29 (3): 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• López-García, G., G. Llorca-Abad, L. Valera-Ordaz, and À Peris-Blanes. 2018. “Los debates electorales, ¿el último reducto frente la mediatización? Un estudio de caso de las elecciones generales españolas de 2015.” Palabra Clave – Revista de Comunicación 21 (3): 772–797.
   Google Scholar
• López-García, G., and L. Valera-Ordaz, eds. 2017. Pantallas Electorales: El discurso de partidos, medios y ciudadanos en la campaña de 2015. Barcelona: UOC.
   Google Scholar
• López-Rico, C.-M., and À Peris Blanes. 2017. “Agenda e Imagen de los Candidatos en las Elecciones Generales de 2015 en España en Programas Televisivos de Infoentretenimiento.” El Profesional de la Información 26 (4): 611–620.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, P., and G. Mazzoleni. 1995. “Verso campagne sempre più mediatizzate.” In I media scendono in campo. Le elezioni politiche 1994 in televisione, edited by P. Mancini, and G. Mazzoleni, 9–67. Turín: ERI.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez Nicolás, M., M. L. Humanes, and E. Saperas Lapiedra. 2014. “La mediatización de la política en el periodismo español. Análisis longitudinal de la información política en la prensa de referencia (1980–2010).” Trípodos 34: 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. 2004. La comunicazione politica. 2nd ed. Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz. 1999. “‘Mediatization’ of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy?” Political Communication 16 (3): 247–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyen, M., M. Thieroff, and S. Strenger. 2014. “Mass Media Logic and The Mediatization of Politics.” Journalism Studies 15 (3): 271–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, D. 2015. “Twitter and Elections: Are Tweets, Predictive, Reactive, or a Form of Buzz?” Information, Communication & Society 18 (7): 816–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, D., A. B. Powell, R. Tinati, N. Anstead, L. Carr, S. J. Halford, and M. Weal. 2016. “Bots and Political Influence: A Sociotechnical Investigation of Social Network Capital.” International Journal of Communication 10: 4952–4971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R., L. Guggenheim, S. M. Jang, and S. Y. Bae. 2014. “The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda-Setting Theory Meets Big Data.” Journal of Communication 64 (2): 193–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. K., and C. Vaccari. 2013. “Do People “Like” Politicians on Facebook? Not Really. Large-Scale Direct Candidate-to-Voter Online Communication as an Outlier Phenomenon.” International Journal of Communication 7: 2333–2356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orriols, L., and G. Cordero. 2016. “The Breakdown of the Spanish Two-Party System: The Upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 General Election.” South European Society and Politics 21 (4): 469–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palau-Sampio, D., A. Carratalá, and L. Valera-Ordaz. 2017. “Mediatización y encuadres de campaña. Análisis comparado de la información de partidos y medios en las elecciones generales de 2015.” El Profesional de la Información 26 (4): 602–610.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger Special Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Alfred A. Knopf Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• References to the IBEREVAL Workshop Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Richards, B. 2010. “News and the Emotional Public Sphere.” In The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, edited by S. Allan, 301–311. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rill, S., D. Reinel, J. Scheidt, and R. V. Zicari. 2014. “PoliTwi: Early Detection of Emerging Political Topics on Twitter and the Impact on Concept-Level Sentiment Analysis.” Knowledge-Based Systems 69: 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogstad, I. 2016. “Is Twitter Just Rehashing? Intermedia Agenda Setting Between Twitter and Mainstream Media.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (2): 142–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampedro, V., and J. Lobera. 2014. “The Spanish 15-M Movement: a Consensual Dissent?” Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies 15 (1–2): 61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., A. Hanna, E. P. Bucy, D. S. Lassen, J. Van Thomme, K. Bialik, J. Yang, and J. C. W. Pevehouse. 2016. “Dual Screening During Presidential Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (14): 1816–1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao, C., G. L. Ciampaglia, O. Varol, K.-C. Yang, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2018. “The Spread of Low-credibility Content by Social Bots.” Nature Communications 9: 4787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella, M., E. Ferrara, and M. De Domenico. 2018. “Bots Increase Exposure to Negative and Inflammatory Content in Online Social Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (49): 12435–12440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, S., A. Bleier, H. Lietz, and M. Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35: 50–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 13 (3): 228–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., and F. Esser. 2009. “Shaping Politics: Mediatization and Media Interventionism.” In Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences, edited by K. Lundby, 205–223. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tremayne, M., and M. Minooie. 2015. “Using Social Media to Analyze Candidate Performance During Televised Political Debates.” Electronic News 9 (3): 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., T. O. Sprenger, P. G. Sandner, and I. M. Welpe. 2010. “Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment.” Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and social media, 178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., A. Chadwick, and B. O’Loughlin. 2015. “Dual Screening the Political: Media Events, Social Media, and Citizen Engagement.” Journal of Communication 65 (6): 1041–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccari, C., and R. K. Nielsen. 2013. “What Drives Politicians’ Online Popularity? An Analysis of the 2010 U.S. Midterm Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10 (2): 208–222.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, C. J., L. Guo, M. E. McCombs, and D. L. Shaw. 2014. “Network Issue Agendas on Twitter During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election.” Journal of Communication 64: 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergeer, M., and P. H. Franses. 2016. “Live Audience Responses to Live Televised Election Debates: Time Series Analysis of Issue Salience and Party Salience on Audience Behavior.” Information, Communication & Society 19 (10): 1390–1410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., D. Roy, and S. Aral. 2018. “The Spread of True and False News Online.” Science 359 (6380): 1146–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., and M. X. Delli Caprini. 2011. After Broadcast News: Media Regimes, Democracy, and the New Information Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. 2012. “Politics as Usual? Revolution, Normalization and a New Agenda for Online Deliberation.” New Media & Society 14 (2): 244–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, W. W., Y. Sang, S. Blasiola, and H. W. Park. 2014. “Predicting Opinion Leaders in Twitter Activism Networks: The Case of the Wisconsin Recall Election.” American Behavioral Scientist 58 (10): 1278–1293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., and Y. M. Kim. 2017. “Equalization or Normalization? Voter–Candidate Engagement on Twitter in the 2010 U.S. Midterm Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14 (3): 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar