Exploring the extent of digitalisation and digital diplomacy in Pakistan embassies

References

• Arsenault, A. 2009. “Public Diplomacy 2.0.” In Toward a New Public Diplomacy: Redirecting U.S. Foreign Policy, edited by P. Seib, 135–155. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Avery, Elizabeth Johnson, and Melissa Wooten Graham. 2013. “Political Public Relations and the Promotion of Participatory, Transparent Government Through Social Media.” International Journal of Strategic Communication 7 (4): 274–291. doi: 10.1080/1553118X.2013.824885.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., P. Jaeger, S. Munson, and T. Glaisyer. 2010. “Social Media Technology and Government Transparency.” IEEE Computer Society, November Issue 43: 53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, C., and L. Jiang. 2015. “Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of the Digital Diplomatic Strategies of the EU, U.S. and Japan in China.” In Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 26–27. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Business World. 2019. Active Social Media Users in Pakistan Grow by 5.7%: Report [online]. https://dailybw.com/2019/02/05/active-social-media-users-in-pakistan-grow-by-5-7-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Capriotti, P., and A. Moreno. 2007. “Corporate Citizenship and Public Relations: The Importance and Interactivity of Social Responsibility Issues on Corporate Websites.” Public Relations Review 33 (1): 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., and P. Kanan. 2008. Leveraging Web 2.0 in Government. IBM Center for the Business of Government: http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/LeveragingWeb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. D., Jeff R. DeWitt, Rebecca K. LeFebvre, et al. 2019. “Hashtag Diplomacy: Twitter as a Tool for Engaging in Public Diplomacy and Promoting US Foreign Policy.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 15: 78–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ComScore. 2011a. The 2010 Canada Digital Year in Review [Online]. http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2011/2010_Canada_Digital_Year_in_Review Accessed May 13, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, G., and A. Arsenault. 2008. “Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 10–30. doi: 10.1177/0002716207311863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, M. D., and S. J. Collins. 2017. “Public Relations Message Strategies and Public Diplomacy 2.0: An Empirical Analysis Using Central-Eastern European and Western Embassy Twitter Accounts.” Public Relations Review 43 (2): 417–425. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorris, M. 2008. “Service Transformation in Government.” Executive Challenges: Today, Tomorrow, and Beyond 1: 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A. 2010. “Mapping the Great Beyond: Identifying Meaningful Networks in Public Diplomacy.” CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy 2: 1–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, A., and A. Brockerhoff. 2008. Options for Influence: Global Campaigns of Persuasion in the new Words of Public Diplomacy. London: Counter point.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. 2011. “Through U.S. Public Diplomacy Beyond the ‘Obama Effect’: Refining the Instruments of Engagement.” American Behavioral Scientist 55: 784–802. doi: 10.1177/0002764211400571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, J., and J. F. Turcotte. 2012. “Tweeting as Statecraft: How, Against All Odds, Twitter is Changing the World’s Second Oldest Profession.” Crossroads: The Macedonian Foreign Policy Journal III (2): 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Ittefaq, M. 2017. Pakistan: A Sorry State of Digital Diplomacy. USC Centre on Public Diplomacy. https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/pakistan-sorry-state-digital-diplomacy.
   Google Scholar
• Ittefaq, M. 2019. “Digital Diplomacy via Social Networks: A Cross-National Analysis of Governmental Usage of Facebook and Twitter for Digital Engagement.” Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 18 (1): 49–69. doi: 10.17477/JCEA.2019.18.1.049.
   Google Scholar
• Izadi, F. 2016. “US Public Diplomacy: A Theoretical Treatise.” The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 46 (1): 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampf, R., I. Manor, and E. Segev. 2015. “Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-National Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10 (4): 331–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. 2011. “The United States After Unipolarity: Repairing the American Image, one Tweet at a Time.” In IDEAS Reports – Special Reports, edited by K. Nicholas, 34–39. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, M. L., and M. Taylor. 1998. “Building Dialogic Relationships Through the World Wide Web.” Public Relations Review 24 (3): 321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H. 2010. Foreign Minister Kim Sung-Hwan‘s Inaugural Address. Seoul: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
   Google Scholar
• Kruckeberg, D., and M. Vujnovic. 2005. “Public Relations, not Propaganda, for US Public Diplomacy in a Post-9/11 World: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Communication Management 9 (4): 296–304. doi:10.1108/13632540510621641.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J. 2010. “Asian Government Usage of web 2.0 Social Media.” European Journal of EPractice 9: 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Medaglia, R., Government Information Quarterly. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Miliopoulou, G. Z., and E. Papaioannou. 2020. “Greek Embassies on Twitter and the Quest for a Strategy.” In Strategic Innovative, edited by A. Kavoura, E. Kefallonitis, and P. Theodoridis, 981–989. Northern Aegean, Greece: Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism8th ICSIMAT.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Information & Broadcasting Government of Pakistan. 2018. Digital Pakistan Policy. http://moib.gov.pk/Downloads/Policy/DIGITAL_PAKISTAN_POLICY (22-05-2018).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., and M. Schultz. 2006. “Corporate Social Responsibility Communication: Stakeholder Information, Response and Involvement Strategies.” Business Ethics: A European Review 15 (4): 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. A., and F. Izadi. 2009. “Ethics and Social Issues in Public Diplomacy: Concepts, Controversies, Challenges and Opportunities.” In Handbook of Public Diplomacy, edited by Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor, 334–351. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pakistan Telecommunication Authority. 2019. Annual Broadband Subscribers by Technology. https://www.pta.gov.pk/en/telecom-indicators/1.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. J., and Y. S. Lim. 2014. “Information Networks and Social Media use in Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of South Korea and Japan.” Asian Journal of Communication 24 (1): 79–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romsdahl, R. 2005. “Political Deliberation and e-Participation in Policy-Making.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 7 (2): 1–11. doi:10.7771/1481-4374.1264.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, H., and S. Thorson. 2010. “Evaluating Social Networking in Public Diplomacy.” In Politics, Democracy and e-Government: Participation and Service Delivery, edited by C. G. Reddick, 243–259. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Small, T. A. 2012. “e-Government in the Age of Social Media: An Analysis of the Canadian Government’s Use of Twitter.” Policy & Internet 4 (3-4): 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• Statista Research Department. 2019. Number of Monetizable Daily Active International Twitter Users (mDAU) from 1st Quarter 2017 to 4th Quarter 2019. https://www.statista.com.
   Google Scholar
• Storie, L. K. 2015. “Lost Publics in Public Diplomacy: Antecedents for Online Relationship Management.” Public Relations Review 41 (2): 315–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twiplomacy Study. 2017. https://twiplomacy.com/blog/twiplomacy-study-2017/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2010. United Nations E-Government Survey 2010: Leveraging e-Government at a Time of Financial and Economic Crisis. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [Online]. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/undpadm/unpan038855.pdf. Accessed May 13, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• USC Center on Public Diplomacy. 2009. What is Public Diplomacy? USC Center on Public Diplomacy, University of Southern California, http://uscpublicdiplomacy.com/index.php/about/ what_is_pd, Accessed 15 September 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, R. D., and J. M. Williams. 2011. “Squawking, Tweeting, Cooing, and Hooting: Analyzing the Communication Patterns of Government Agencies on Twitter.” Journal of Public Affairs 11 (4): 353–363.
   Google Scholar
• Wigand, D. L. 2011. “Twitter in Government: Building Relationships one Tweet at a Time.” Paper presented at the seventh international conference on IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, 563–567.
   Google Scholar
• Xiguang, Li, and Wang Jing. 2010. “Web-based Public Diplomacy.” The Journal of International Communication 16 (1): 7–22. DOI: 10.1080/13216597.2010.9674756.
   Google Scholar
• Zaharna, R. S., and N. Uysal. 2016. “Going for the Jugular in Public Diplomacy: How Adversarial Publics Using Social Media are Challenging State Legitimacy.” Public Relations Review 42 (1): 109–119. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.07.006 Get rights and content.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and B. C. Swartz. 2009. “Public Diplomacy to Promote Global Public Goods (GPG) Conceptual Expansion, Ethical Grounds, and Rhetoric.” Public Relations Review 35 (4): 382–387. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, X., and J. Lu. 2013. “Public Diplomacy Meets Social Media: A Study of the U.S. Embassy's Blogs and Micro-Blogs.” Public Relations Review 39 (5): 542–548. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar