Battered Women Who Kill: Impact of Expert Testimony Type and Timing

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B.H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1022326807441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, N., & Borgida, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social–cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372–386. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.55.3.372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deitz, S.R., Blackwell, K.T., Daley, P.C., & Bentley, B.J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.43.2.372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, J. (1995). Understanding criminal law (2nd ed.). New York: Matthew Bender/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, M. (1993). Understanding women's responses to domestic violence: A redefinition of battered woman syndrome. Hofstra Law Review, 21, 1191–1242. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, M., & Goodman, L.A. (1994). Posttraumatic stress disorder among battered women: Analysis of legal implications. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 215–234. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370120303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, C. (1987). Battered women who kill: Psychological self-defence as legal justification. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Faigman, D. (1986). The battered woman syndrome and self-defence: A legal and empirical dissent. Virginia Law Review, 72, 619–647. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel, N.J., Meister, K.H., & Lightfoot, D.M. (1991). The self-defence defence and community sentiment. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 585–602. doi: 10.1007/BF01065854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, C.K. (1989). Justifiable homicide: Battered women, self-defense, and the law. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haegerich, T.M., & Bottoms, B.L. (2000). Empathy and jurors’ decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421–448. doi: 10.1023/A:1005592213294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janoff-Bulman, R. (1979). Characterological versus behavioral self-blame: Inquiries into depression and rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1798–1809. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P., & Davidson, B. (1990). Battered women in the criminal justice system: An analysis of gender stereotypes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8, 171–180. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370080208
   Google Scholar
• Kasian, M.A., Spanos, N.P., Terrance, C.A., & Peebles, S. (1993). Battered women who kill: Jury simulation and legal defences. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 289–312. doi: 10.1007/BF01044510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovera, M., Gresham, A., Borgida, E., Gray, E., & Regan, P. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178–191. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, C.M., & Giulietti, R. (1990). Perceptions of wife abuse: Effects of gender, attitudes toward women, and just-world beliefs among college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 177–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1990.tb00013.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguigan, H. (1991). Battered women and self-defence: Myths and misconceptions in current reform proposals. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 140, 379–486. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. (1991). Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review, 90, 1–94. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (1988). Social science research in law: A new paradigm. American Psychologist, 43, 465–472. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., & Walker, L. (2011). Twenty-five years of social science in law. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 72–82. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9214-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., Walker, L., & Mitchell, G. (2009). The limits of social framework evidence. Law, probability & risk. Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2009-08. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1421235
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger Blowers, A., & Bjerregaard, B. (1994). The admissibility of expert testimony on the battered woman syndrome in homicide cases. Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 22, 527–560.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: Effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumm, K.M., & Terrance, C.A. (2009). Battered women who kill: The impact of expert testimony and empathy induction in the courtroom. Violence Against Women, 15(2), 186–205. doi: 10.1177/1077801208329145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raitt, F.E., & Zeedyk, S. (2000). The implicit relation of psychology and law: Women and syndrome evidence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Regina v. Lavallee, 55 C. C. C. (3d), 97 (S.C.C. 1990).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E.M. (1986). Describing and changing women's self-defence work and the problem of expert testimony on battering. Women's Rights Law Reporter, 9, 195–222. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, E.M. (2000). Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A. (1992). The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 597–620. doi: 10.1007/BF01884018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A. (1994). Applications of battered woman syndrome evidence in the courtroom. In M. Costanzo & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Violence and the Law (pp. 113–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A., & Cripps, J. (1998). Expert evidence pertaining to battered women: The impact of gender of expert and timing of testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 17–31. doi: 10.1023/A:1025772604721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A., & Hastings, P. (1996). Trials of battered women who kill: The impact of alternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 167–187. doi: 10.1007/BF01499353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A., McKimmie, B.M., & Janz, T. (2004). The impact of expert testimony in trials of battered women who kill. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 11, 1–12. doi: 10.1375/1321871041336091
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A., & Rzepa, S. (2002). Expert testimony pertaining to battered woman syndrome: Its impact on jurors’ decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 655–673. doi: 10.1023/A:1020933618221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuller, R.A., Wells, E., Rzepa, S., & Klippenstine, M.A. (2004). Rethinking battered woman syndrome evidence: The impact of alternative forms of expert testimony on mock jurors’ decisions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 36, 127–136. doi: 10.1037/h0087223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, K.G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113. doi: 10.1037/h0028777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos, N.P., Dubreuil, S.C., Coburn, B.L., & Auger, R. (1991). Interaction of complainant demeanor and evidence strength on the beliefs and verdicts of mock jurors in a rape trial. Unpublished manuscript, Carleton University, Ottawa.
   Google Scholar
• Stefan, S. (1994). The protection racket: Rape trauma syndrome, psychiatric labeling, and law. Northwestern University Law Review, 88, 1271–1345. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Terrance, C.A, & Matheson, K. (2003). Undermining reasonableness: Expert testimony in a case involving a battered woman who kills. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 37–45. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.t01-2-00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrance, C.A., Matheson, K., & Spanos, N.P. (2000). Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 207–229. doi: 10.1023/A:1005411003414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of intimate partner violence against women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. U.S. Department of Justice, NCJ 183781. Retrieved from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/183781.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, A., Kenning, M., Greenwald, J., & Johnson, G. (1993). Self-defence jury instructions in trials of battered women who kill their partner. In N.Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault, current trends and evaluation (pp. 258–285), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. (1984). The battered woman syndrome. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, L. (1992). Battered women syndrome and self-defence, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 6, 321–334. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org.
   Google Scholar