References
- Andrews, D.A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The level of service inventory—revised. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
- Del Re A.C., Fluckiger C., Horvath A.O., Symonds D., & Wampold B.E. (2012). Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance-outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 642–649.
- Ehrlich, I. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 521–565.
- Festinger, D.S., Marlowe, D.B., Lee, P.A., Kirby, K.C., Bovasso, G., & McLellan, A.T. (2002). Status hearings in drug court: When more is less and less is more. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68, 151–157.
- Goldkamp, J.S., White, M.D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 27–72.
- Jones, C. (2011). Intensive judicial supervision and drug court outcomes: Interim results from a randomised controlled trial. Retrieved from the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research website http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/bocsar/ll_bocsar.nsf/vwFiles/CJB152.pdf/$file/CJB152.pdf
- Jones, C. (2013). Early-phase outcomes from a randomized trial of intensive judicial supervision in an Australian drug court. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 40, 453–468.
- Klein, H. (1996). The power of connection: Fuel for drug courts. Paper presented at the 1996 Florida Drug Court Conference, Florida.
- Marlowe, D.B., Festinger, D.S., Lee, P.A., Dugosh, K.L., & Benasutti, K.M. (2006). Matching judicial supervision to clients’ risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 52–76.
- McIvor, G. (2009). Therapeutic jurisprudence and procedural justice in Scottish Drug Courts. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 9, 29–49.
- Mitchell, O., Wilson, D.B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D.L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 60–71.
- Nagin, D.S., & Pogarsky, G. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence. Criminology, 39, 865–891.
- Nagin, D.S., & Pogarsky, G. (2003). An experimental investigation of deterrence: Cheating, self-serving bias, and impulsivity. Criminology, 41, 167–193.
- National Association of Drug Court Professionals. (1997). Defining drug courts: The key components. Retrieved from http://www.nadcp.org/sites/default/files/nadcp/KeyComponents_0.pdf (accessed 3 June 2012).
- Shaffer, D.K. (2011). Looking inside the black box of drug courts: A meta-analytic review. Justice Quarterly, 28, 493–521.
- Turner, S., Longshore, D., Wenzel, S., Deschenes, E. P., Greenwood, P. W., Fain, T. et al. (2002). A decade of drug treatment court research. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1489–1527.
- Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Wexler, D.B. (2001). Robes and rehabilitation: How judges can help offenders ‘make good’. Court Review, 38, 18–23.
- Winick, B.J., & Wexler, D.B. (2003). Judging in a therapeutic key: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the courts. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.