Does Extensive Free Narrative Prompting Minimise the Effect of Mental Reinstatement on Children's Recall of Events?

References

• Agnew, S. E., & Powell, M. B. (2004). The effect of intellectual disability on children's recall of an event across different question types. Law and Human Behaviour, 28, 273–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, G. D. (1981). The intraclass correlation as a measure of interrater reliability of subjective judgments. Nursing Research, 30, 314–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas, H. M., Fiore, S. M., & Oser, R. L. (2002). Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments. Instructional Science, 30, 433–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietze, P. M., Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. M. (2010). Mental reinstatement of context with child witnesses: Does it matter whether context is reinstated ‘out loud’? Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietze, P. M., Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. M. (2012). Examination of the effect of mental reinstatement of context across developmental level, retention interval and type of mnemonic instruction. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 19, 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietze, P. M., Sharman, S. J., Powell, M. B., & Thomson, D. M. (2011). Context reinstatement effects in children's cued recall of strongly and weakly associated word pairs. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 28, 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Dietze, P. M., & Thomson, D. M. (1993). Mental reinstatement of context: A technique for interviewing child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques in investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, L. B. (2000). Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 109–129.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps towards influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 480–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P., & Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus yypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. K., & Delamothe, K. (1997). Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility in children's recall. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 562–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday, R. E., & Albon, A. J. (2004). Minimising misinformation effects in young children with cognitive interview mnemonics. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2007). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and using special measures. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. S., Granhag, P. A., & Spjut, E. (2003). Children's recall and the cognitive interview: Do the positive effects hold over time? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 203–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, M. R., & Fisher, R. P. (1995). Facilitating children's eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 510–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R., & Bull, R. (1995). An empirical test of the mnemonic components of the cognitive interview. In G. Davies, S. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran, & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice: International developments in research and practice (pp. 135–146). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Holley, A., Wark, L., Bull, R., & Kohnken, G. (1996). Reducing suggestibility in child witness interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 503–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2002). Back to basics: A componential analysis of the original cognitive interview mnemonics with three age groups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 743–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1967) [1933]. The testing of statistical hypotheses in relation to probabilities a priori. In J. Neyman, & E. S. Pearson (Eds.), Joint Statistical Papers by J. Neyman & E. S. Pearson (pp. 186–202). California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B. (2008). Guide to designing effective training programs in the area of investigative interviewing of children. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 20, 189–208.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., Garry, M., & Brewer, N. (2009). Eyewitness testimony. In I. Freckelton & H. Selby (Eds.). Expert evidence. Pyrmont, Australia: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. B., & Snow, P. C. (2007). Guide to questioning children during the free-narrative phase of an investigative interview. Australian Pschologist, 42, 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saywitz, K. J., Geiselman, R. E., & Bornstein, G. K. (1992). Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 744–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission. (2004). Sexual offences: Law and procedure final report. Melbourne, Australia: Victorian Law Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar