The Power of the Spoken Word: Can Spoken-Recall Enhance Eyewitness Evidence?

References

• Anderson, J.R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 261–295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371%2883%2990201-3
   Google Scholar
• Ayers, M.S., & Reder, L.M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. doi: 10.1038/nrn1201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A.D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 48–79). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekerian, D., & Dennett, J. (1990). Spoken and written recall of visual narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 175–187. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork, R.A. (1988). Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris & R.N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 396–401). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, P., Fisher, R.P., & Cutler, B.L. (1999). Examining the cognitive interview in a double-test paradigm. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 29–45. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10683169908414992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabeza, R., Dolcos, F., Prince, S.E., Rice, H.J., Weissman, D.H., & Nyberg, L. (2003). Attention-related activity during episodic memory retrieval: A cross function fMRI study. Neuropsychologica, 43, 390–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysart, J.E., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (2007). The effects of delay on eyewitness identification accuracy: Should we be concerned? In R.C.L. Lindsay, D.R. Ross, J.D. Read & M.P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology. Vol II. Memory for people (pp. 361–376). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, E.B., & Rienick, C.B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745–762. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmes, D.G., Kantowitz, B.H., & Roediger, H.L. (1991). Research methods in psychology (5th edn). St. Paul, MN: West.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory. In M.P. Toglia, J.D. Read, D.F. Ross & R.C.L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. I. Memory for events (pp. 53–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R.P. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 298–307. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R.P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against susceptibility to misinformation with the use of a Self-Administered Interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 568–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L.A., Sullivan, S., Avetissian, I., & Prosk, A. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 505–525. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J.D. (1978). How experts dictate. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 648–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowski, J. (2010). Speaking, writing, and memory span in children: Output modality affects cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychology, 45, 28–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R.P. (2011). From laboratory to the streets: Capturing witness memory using the Self-Administed Interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 211–226. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011,02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M., & Berkowitz, A. (1967). Listening and reading, speaking and writing: An experimental investigation of differenital acquisition and reproduction of memory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 24, 207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M.R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers’ perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 323–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M.R., Milne, R., & Wagstaff, G.F. (1999). The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5, 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R.T. (2001). Presentation modality and mode of recall in verbal false memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 913–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R.T. (2007). Are written and spoken recall of text equivalent? American Journal of Psychology 120, 415–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S.M., Mather, M., Villa, D., & Morita, S.K. (2001). How events are reviewed matters: Effects of varied focus on eyewitness suggestibility. Memory & Cognition, 29, 940–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, D., Allen, B.P., Chan, J.C., & Dahl, L.C. (2004). Eyewitness suggestibility and source similarity: Intrusions of details from one event into memory reports of another event. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 96–111. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, J.P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 90–95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.1.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E.F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E.F., Miller, D.G., & Burns, H.J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M. (2002). Retrieval-induced forgetting in eyewitness memory: Forgetting as a consequence of remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 135–149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. (1966). Law and psychology in conflict (2nd edn). New York: Babbs-Murrill.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Zaragoza, M., Clifford, B.R., & Kidd, L. (2010). Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for forcibly fabricated events. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 105–117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9172-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogey, N., Sarab, G., Haywood, J., Heyningen, S.V., Dewhurst, D., Hounsell, D., & Neilson, R. (2008). The end of handwriting? Using computers in traditional essay examinations. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudd, K., & Govern, J.M. (2004). Conformity to misinformation and time delay negatively affect eyewitness confidence and accuracy. North American Journal of Psychology, 6, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy–confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 973–985. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.1263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H.M., & Kemp, R.I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering postevent information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083–1099. doi: 10.1002/acp.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H.M., & Kemp, R.I., & Forgas, J.P. (2009). Co-witnesses, confederates, and conformity: Effects of discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(Suppl. 1).
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, H.M., Kemp, R.I., & Ng, J.R. (2011). Combating co-witness contamination: Attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, K. (2004). When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self-generated misinformation on eyewitness memory. Memory, 12, 14–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H.L., & Guynn, M.J. (1996). Retrieval processes. In E.L. Bjork & R.A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 197–237). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, J., & MacLeod, M.D. (2002). New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 127–142. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D.L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54, 182–203. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B., & Reisberg, D. (1991). Learning and memory (1st edn). New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J.S., Bjork, R.A., & Handal, A. (1995). Retrieval-induced forgetting in an eyewitness-memory paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 249–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtle, J.W., & Yuille, J.C. (1994). Lost but not forgotten details: Repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology 79, 260–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Water, D.A., Monti, L.A., Kirchner, P.B., & O’Connell, D. C. (1987). Speaking and writing: Comparisons of two psycholinguistic siblings. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25, 99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G.L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S.D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 45–75. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaragoza, M., Belli, R., & Payment, K. (2006). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 35–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar