Juvenile offenders on trial: does alibi corroboration evidence and defendant age interact to influence jurors’ perceptions and verdicts?

References

• Allison, M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (2010). Alibi believability: the effect of prior convictions and judicial instructions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1054–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00610.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi: 10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, T. M., Turtle, J. W., & Olson, E. (2007). Alibis in criminal investigations and trials. In T. M. Burke, J. W. Turtle, & E. A. Olson (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. I: Memory for events (pp. 157–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Camilletti, C.R., & Scullin, M.H. (2012). Attorney and lay beliefs about factors affecting jurors' perceptions of juvenile offender culpability. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 113–128. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2011.613390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauffman, E., & Steinberg, L. (2000). Researching adolescents’ judgment and culpability. In T. Grisso & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 325–343). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2004). An alibi witness’ influence on mock jurors’ verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1604–1616. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02789.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghetti, S., & Redlich, A. D. (2001). Reactions to youth crime: perceptions of accountability and competency. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19, 33–52. doi: 10.1002/bls.426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (2000). What we know about youths’ capacities as trial defendants. In T. Grisso & R.G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 139–171). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., Jolly, K. W., Chavez, R. M., & Shaw, L. H. (2011). Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors’ judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 127–142. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambam, P., & Thompson, D. (2009). The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27, 173–190. doi: 10.1002/bsl.859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2004). What makes a good alibi? A proposed taxonomy. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 157–176. doi: 10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022320.47112.d3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, E. S. (2000). Criminal responsibility in adolescence: Lessons from developmental psychology. In T. Grisso & R.G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 291–324). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semple, J. K., & Woody, W. D. (2011). Juveniles tried as adults: the age of the juvenile matters. Psychological Reports, 109, 301–308. doi: 10.2466/07.17.PRO.109.4.301-308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. G., Reppucci, N. D., & Woolard, J. L. (2003). Effectiveness of participation as a defendant: the attorney–juvenile client relationship. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 175–198. doi: 10.1002/bsl.532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. C., Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Haegerich, T. M. (2009). Understanding adults’ perceptions of juvenile offenders. In M. C. Najdowski, C. J. Bottoms, & T. M. Haegerich (Eds.), Children as victims, witnesses, and offenders: Psychological science and the law (pp. 349–368). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, C. M., & Woody, W. D. (2011). Juror decision making for juveniles tried as adults: the effects of defendant age, crime type, and crime outcome. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 659–675. doi: 10.1080/10683160903493471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warling, D., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2003). The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 63–82. doi: 10.1002/bsl.517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimring, F. E. (2000). Penal proportionality for the young offender: notes on immaturity, capacity, and diminished responsibility. In T. Grisso & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 271–289). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar