When Snitches Corroborate: Effects of Post-identification Feedback from a Potentially Compromised Source

References

• Charman, S. D., & Wells, G. L. (2012). The moderating effect of ecphoric experience on post-identification feedback: A critical test of the cues-based inference conceptualization. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(2), 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglass, A. B., Neuschatz, J. S., Imrich, J., & Wilkinson, M. (2010). Does post-identification feedback affect evaluations of eyewitness testimony and identification procedures? Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 282–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasel, L., & Kassin, S. (2009). On the presumption of evidentiary independence: Can confessions corrupt eyewitness identifications. Psychological Science, 20, 122–126. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02262.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innocence Project. (2014). Understand the causes: Eyewitness misidentification. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/understand/Eyewitness-Misidentification.php.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33–67. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S., & Kiechel, K. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125–128. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 469–484. doi: 10.1023/A:1024871622490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Los Angeles County Grand Jury. (1990). Investigation of the involvement of jailhouse informants in the criminal justices system in Los Angeles County.
   Google Scholar
• Lampinen, J. M., Scott, J., Leding, J. K., Pratt, D., & Arnal, J. D. (2007). “Good, you identified the suspect…but please ignore this feedback”: Can warnings eliminate the effects of post-identification feedback? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 1037–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luus, C. A. E., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 714–723. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Lawson, D. S., Swanner, J. K., Meissner, C. A., & Neuschatz, J. S. (2008). The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 137–149. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9100-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Preston, E. L., Burkett, A. D., Toglia, M. P., Lampinene, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., & Goodsell, C. A. (2005). The effects of post-identification feedback and age on retrospective eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 435–453. doi:10.1002/acp.1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuschatz, J. S., Wilkinson, M. L., Goodsell, C. A., Wetmore, S. A., Quinlivan, D. S., & Jones, N. J. (2012). Secondary confessions, expert testimony, and unreliable testimony. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 179–192. doi:10.1007/s11896-012-9102-x.
   Google Scholar
• Skagerberg, E. M., & Wright, D. B. (2007). The prevalence of co-witness and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 14, 513–521. doi:10.1080/10683160801948980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. K., Wells, G. L., & Douglass, A. B. (2014). The eyewitness post identification feedback effect 15 years later: Theoretical and policy implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanner, J. K., Beike, D. R., & Cole, A. T. (2010). Snitching, lies, and computer crashes: An experimental investigation of secondary confessions. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 53–65. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9173-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement [Booklet]. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L. Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., Olson, E. A., & Charman, S. (2003). Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 42–52. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.9.1.42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetmore, S. A., Neuschatz, J. S., & Gronlund, S. D. (2014). On the power of secondary confessions. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 20, 339–357. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2013.777963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar