Sugar and Spice and All Things Nice: The Role of Gender Stereotypes in Jurors’ Perceptions of Criminal Defendants

References

• Archer, J., & Lloyd, B. (2002). Sex and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2004). Psychology and law: Theory, research, and application (3rd ed.). United States of America: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V. (1990). Stereotypes as judgmental heuristics: Evidence of circadian variations in discrimination. Psychological Science, 1(5), 319–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1987). Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 871–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., & Wyer, R. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision-making and information processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 267–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer, M., Judd, C. M., & Jacquelin, V. (2001). The communication of social stereotypes: The effects of group discussion and information distribution of stereotypic appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 463–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, A., Marek, P., & May, J. C. (2003). The protestant work ethic, expectancy violations and criminal sentencing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 522–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowen, B. (1995). Women and Crime. In L. Adler & F. L. Denmark (Eds.), Violence and the prevention of violence (pp. 157–168). Westport, USA: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K. (1989). Rethinking judicial paternalism: Gender, work-family relations and sentencing. Gender and Society, 3(1), 9–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, K., Wayne, J. H., Mack, D., & Thomas, K. (2000). An examination of happiness, racism, and demographics on judgements of guilt. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 816–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation of attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Neuberg, S. L., Beattie, A. E., & Milberg, S. J. (1987). Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 399–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsterlee, L., Fox, G. B., Forsterlee, R., & Ho, R. (2004). The effects of a victim impact statement and gender on juror information processing in a criminal trial: Does the punishment fit the crime? Australian Psychologist, 39(1), 57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 959–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. A., Bindrim, T. A., McNicholas, M. L., & Walden, T. L. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(2), 191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendree, P. K., & Nicks, S. D. (2000). Perceptions of violent crimes in relation to sex of perpetrator. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90(2), 485–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. S., & Kaplan, M. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapardis, A. (2014). Psychology and law (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt, C., & Green, D. E. (1984). The sex-sanctioning issue: Is it history? American Sociological Review, 49, 541–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, C. (1984). Female crime and delinquency. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Masters, J. M., Masser, B. M., Schuller, R. A., & Terry, D. J. (2013). Stereotypical and counterstereotypical defendants: Who is he and what was the case against her? Psychology Public Policy and Law, 19(3), 343–354. doi: 10.1037/A0030505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKimmie, B. M., Newton, C. J., Terry, D. J., & Schuller, R. A. (2004). Jurors' responses to expert witness testimony: The effects of gender stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(2), 131–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, I. H. (1981). Sex differences in the processing of criminal defendants. In A. Morris &  Gelsthorpe (Eds.), Women and crime: Papers presented to the Cropwood round-Table conference (pp. 104–124). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn't be, are allowed to be, and don't have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saulters-Tubbs, C. (1993). Prosecutorial and judicial treatment of female offenders. Federal Probation, 57(2), 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R. A., Terry, D., & McKimmie, B. (2001). The impact of an expert's gender on jurors' decisions. Law & Psychology Review, 25, 59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Schuller, R. A., Terry, D. J., & McKimmie, B. M. (2005). The impact of expert testimony on jurors' decisions: Gender of the expert and testimony complexity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), 1266–1280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, L., Gillett, R., Davies, G. M., Blaauw, E., & Patel, D. (2003). 'There's no smoke without fire': Are male ex-partners perceived as more 'entitled' to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers? British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 87–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. (2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multisite study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11(2), 149–184.
   Google Scholar
• Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C., & Glass, B. (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 102–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier, D., & Kramer, J. H. (1983). Sex-based differences in the sentencing of adult criminal defendants. An empirical test and theoretical overview. Sociology and Social Research, 66, 289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Steury, E. H., & Frank, N. (1990). Gender Bias and pre-trial release: More pieces of the puzzle. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 417–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strub, T., & McKimmie, B. (2012). Note takers who review are less vulnerable to the influence of stereotypes than note takers who do not review. Psychology Crime & Law, 18(10), 859–876. doi: 10.1080/1068316x.2011.581241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, A., Dijksterhuis, A., & Vermeulen, D. (1999). Judgement and memory of a criminal act: The effects of stereotypes and cognitive load. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 191–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Krieken, R., Smith, P., Habbibis, D., McDonald, K., Haralambos, M., & Holborm, M. (2000). Sociology: Themes and perspectives (2nd ed.). French's Forest: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Viki, G. T., Massey, K., & Masser, B. (2005). When chivalry backfires: Benevolent sexism and attitudes toward Myra Hindley. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 10(1), 109–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayne, J. H., Riordan, C. M., & Thomas, K. M. (2001). Is all sexual harassment viewed the same? Mock juror decisions in same- and cross-gender cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 86(2), 179–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar