Does Offenders’ Facial Attractiveness Affect Police Officers’ Judgment?

References

• Ahola, A., Hellstrom, A., & Christianson, S. A. (2010). Is justice really blind? Effects of crime descriptions, defendant gender and appearance, and legal practitioner gender on sentences and defendant evaluations in a mock trial. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17, 304–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpert Group. (2004). Miami–Dade racial profiling study. Columbia, SC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. M., & Loftus, E. F. (2009). How to tell if a particular memory is true or false. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 370–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birzer, M. L., & Birzer, G. H. (2006). Race matters: A critical look at racial profiling, it's a matter for the courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 643–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M. (1981). Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 496–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, B. W., & Jeffers, D. (1998). The effects of defendant and juror attractiveness on simulated courtroom trial decisions. Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K. K., Bersheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. C., & Lyons, P. M. (1991). Natural observations of the links between attractiveness and initial legal judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 541–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M.G., & Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analysis of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efran, M. G. (1974). The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, R. S., & Calnon, J. M. (2004). Examining the influence of driver's characteristics during traffic stops with police: Results from a national survey. Justice Quarterly, 21, 49–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, R. S., &. Johnson, R. (2006). Toward a better understanding of racial and ethnic disparities in search and seizure rates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 605–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In Milton T. & Lerner, M. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology volume 5: Personality and social psychology. (pp. 159–184). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 390–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farell, A., McDevitt, J., Bailey, L., Andresen, C., & Pierce, E. (2004). Massachusetts racial and gender profiling study: Final report. Boston: Institute of Race and Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., & Sporer, S. L. (2010). Unconscious influences in sentencing decisions: a research review of psychological sources of disparity. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunnell, J. J., & Ceci, S. J. (2010). When emotionality trumps reason: A study of individual processing style and juror bias. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 850–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, W. A. (1978). Physical attractiveness, self-disclosure, and helping behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 15–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 42–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koessler, S., Engler, H., Riether, C., & Kissler, J. (2009). No retrieval-induced forgetting under stress. Psychological Science, 20, 1356–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, B. R., & Lundman, R. J. (2007). Vehicle stops by police for driving while black: Common problems and some tentative solutions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 165–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langolis, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallam, M., & Smoot, M. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzella, R., & Feingold, A. (1994). The effects of physical attractiveness, race, socioeconomic status, and gender of defendants and victims on judgments of mock jurors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1315–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, E., & Gamliel, E. (2013). Heuristics and biases in judicial decisions. Court Review, 49, 114–118.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, S. (1968). The victim and his criminal: A study in functional responsibility. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, S. (1977). Victimology: The victim and his criminal. Reston, VA. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, K., G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechory-Bitton, M. & Zvi, L. (2015). The effect of offender's attractiveness and subject's gender on judgments in swindling. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(4), 559–570. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.960037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechory, M., Nachson, I., & Glicksohn, J. (2010). Effects of stereotype and suggestion on memory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 54(1), 113–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shechory, M., Perry, G., & Addad, M. (2011). Pathways to women's crime: Differences between women convicted for drug, violence and fraud offenses. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(4), 399–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., & Alpert, G. P. (2007). Explaining police bias: A theory of social conditioning and illusory correlation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1262–1283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. R., Makarios, M., & Alpert, G. P. (2006). Differential suspicion: Theory specification and gender effects in the traffic stop context. Justice Quarterly, 23, 271–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. E. (1980). Defendant's attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 348–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. E. (1985). Appearance and punishment: The attraction leniency effect in the courtroom. The Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 373–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillyer, R., Engel, R. S., & Wooldredge, J. (2008). The intersection of racial profiling research and the law. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 138–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walster, E. (1966). Assignment of responsibility for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. W. (1978). Helping behavior and physical attractiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 104, 313–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar