Exploring the educative role of judges’ sentencing remarks: an analysis of remarks on child exploitation material

References

• Aiken, M., Moran, M., & Berry, M.J. (2011, September). Child abuse material and the Internet: Cyberpsychology of online child related sex offending. In 29th meeting of the INTERPOL Specialist Group on Crimes against Children (pp. 5–7). Lyons, France.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, D., & Edelmann, R. (2014). Demographic and offence characteristics: A comparison of sex offenders convicted of possessing indecent images of children, committing contact sex offences or both offences. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 25(2), 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attorney-General's Department. (2013). National plan to combat cybercrime. Barton: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission. (2006). Same crime, same time report sentencing of federal offenders report 103. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K.M., Hanson, R.K., & VanZuylen, H. (2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 45–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, R.M., & Merdian, H.L. (2016). The implicit theories of child sexual exploitation material users: An initial conceptualization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 26, 16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beech, A.R., Elliott, I.A., Birgden, A., & Findlater, D. (2008). The internet and child sexual offending: A criminological review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(3), 216–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P., Brantingham, P., & Taylor, W. (2005). Situational crime prevention as a key component in embedded crime prevention. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 47(2), 271–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantingham, P.J., & Faust, F.L. (1976). A conceptual model of crime prevention. Crime & Delinquency, 22(3), 284–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M., & Hammond, S. (2017). A methodology for profiling paraphilic interest in Child Sexual Exploitation Material users on peer-to-peer networks. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(1), 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassell, P.G., Marsh, J.R., & Christiansen, J.M. (2016). Not just ‘kiddie porn’: The significant harms from child pornography possession. In C.B. Hessick (Ed.), Refining child pornography law: Crime, language, and social consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Child Exploiation and Online Protection Centre. (2013). Annual review 2012-2013 & Centre Plan 2013-2014. London: National Crime Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Conde, A. (2011). Combating ‘child abuse images’ through committed, transversal and internationally co-ordinated action. Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2008). Judicial censure and moral communication to youth sex offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25(3), 496–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danay, R.J. (2005). The danger of fighting monsters: Addressing the hidden harms of child pornography law. Review of Constitutional Studies, 11, 151–191.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, D., & Whitehead, H. (2012). Stop it Now! UK & Ireland helpline and campaign report 2002-2012: 10 year anniversary edition. Birmingham: Lucy Faithful Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Family and Community Services. (2000). Tomorrow's children: Australia's national plan of action. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Social Services. (2009). Protecting children is everyone's business: National framework for protecting Australia's children 2009-2020. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dillof, A.M. (2016). Possession, child pornography and proportionality: Criminal liability for aggregate harm offenses. Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2016(16), 1–44. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811655
   Google Scholar
• DPP v Pearce (2015). VCC 1486 (3 September 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, I.A., Beech, A.R., & Mandeville-Norden, R. (2013). The psychological profiles of internet, contact, and mixed internet/contact sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 25(1), 3–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I.A., Beech, A.R., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Hayes, E. (2009). Psychological profiles of internet sexual offenders: Comparisons with contact sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse, 21(1), 76–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiberg, A. (2014). Fox & Freiberg's sentencing: State and federal law in victoria. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. (2011). Child pornography law and policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A. (2016). Cybercrime: Key Issues and Debates. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harduf, A. (2016). Criminalization downloads evil: Reexamining the approach to electronic possession when child pornography goes international. Boston University Internation Law Journal, 34, 279–318.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, T.G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479–498.
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw, M., Ogloff, J.R., & Clough, J.A. (2015). Looking beyond the screen: A critical review of the literature on the online child pornography offender. Sexual Abuse, 29(5), 416–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howitt, D., & Sheldon, K. (2007). The role of cognitive distortions in paedophilic offending: Internet and contact offenders compared. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(5), 469–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Internet Watch Foundation. (2016). Annual report. Cambridge, UK: Internet Watch Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, S., Ennis, L., Stein, S., Choy, A.L., & Hook, T. (2013). Child pornography possessors: Comparisons and contrasts with contact-and non-contact sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 19(3), 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettleborough, D.G., & Merdian, H.L. (2017). Gateway to offending behaviour: Permission-giving thoughts of online users of child sexual exploitation material. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(1), 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oakes, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Laycock, G. (2013). Crime Prevention (Situational and Social). In T. Newburn & P. Neyroud (Eds.), Dictionary of policing. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, M., & Taylor, C. (2015). Women's experiences of learning about the involvement of a partner possessing child abuse material in Australia. Melbourne: PartnerSPEAK.
   Google Scholar
• Maalla M'jid, N. (2013). Report of the special rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, G. (2005). How judges sentence. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, G., Stobbs, N., & O'Leary, J. (2010). Principles of sentencing. Annandale: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacMartin, C., & Wood, L.A. (2005). Sexual motives and sentencing: Judicial discourse in cases of child sexual abuse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(2), 139–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & Mann, R.E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 155–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxfield, M.G., & Babbie, E.R. (2015). Research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Stamford: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Merdian, H.L., Curtis, C., Thakker, J., Wilson, N., & Boer, D.P. (2014). The endorsement of cognitive distortions: Comparing child pornography offenders and contact sex offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(10), 971–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merdian, H.L., Wilson, N., Thakker, J., Curtis, C., & Boer, D.P. (2013). ‘So why did you do it?’: Explanations provided by child pornography offenders. Sexual Offender Treatment, 8(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Minehan v R (2010). NSWCCA 140.
   Google Scholar
• Mirkin, H. (2009). The social, political, and legal construction of the concept of child pornography. Journal of Homosexuality, 56(2), 233–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donnell, I., & Milner, C. (2007). Child pornography: Crime, computers and society. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, S. (2002). Children at risk: Legal and societal perceptions of the potential threat that the possession of child pornography poses to society. Journal of Law and Society, 29(3), 436–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ost, S. (2009). Child pornography and sexual grooming: Legal and societal responses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ost, S. (2010). Criminalising fabricated images of child pornography: A matter of harm or morality? Legal Studies, 30(2), 230–256.
   Google Scholar
• Peršak, N. (2016). Legitimacy and trust in criminal law, policy and justice: Norms, procedures, outcomes. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierrete, M., Gotsis, T., & Poletti, P. (2010). Sentencing offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences. Judicial Commission of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, J., & Spiranovic, C. (2014). Child exploitation material in the context of institutional child sexual abuse. Sydney: Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, J., Spiranovic, C., Gelb, K., Watters, P.A., & Krone, T. (2016). Tertiary education students' attitudes to the harmfulness of viewing and distributing child pornography. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(2), 224–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prichard, J., Watters, P.A., & Spiranovic, C. (2011). Internet subcultures and pathways to the use of child pornography. Computer Law & Security Review, 27(6), 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Safety Canada. (2015). Public safety Canada 2013-2014 evaluation of the national strategy for the protection of children from sexual exploitation on the internet. Canada: Government of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. (2002). Paedophiles, pornography and the internet: Assessment issues. British Journal of Social Work, 32(7), 863–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, J.V., Kimonis, E.R., & Seto, M.C. (2014). Correlates and moderators of child pornography consumption in a community sample. Sexual Abuse, 26(6), 523–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, A. (2016). The dignitary harm of child pornography – from producers to possessors. In C.B. Hessick (Ed.), Refining child pornography law: Crime, language, and social consequences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• R v Ryan (2012). SASCFC 136 (20 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Seigfried, K.C., Lovely, R.W., & Rogers, M.K. (2008). Self-reported online child pornography behavior: A psychological analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2(1), 286–297.
   Google Scholar
• Seigfried-Spellar, K. (2013). Individual differences of internet child pornography users: Peculiar findings in a community-based study. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Act 1997 (Tas).
   Google Scholar
• Steel, C.M. (2015). Web-based child pornography: The global impact of deterrence efforts and its consumption on mobile platforms. Child Abuse & Neglect, 44, 150–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, B. (1997). The politics of sex: Prostitution and pornography in Australia since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C.R. (1996). Social norms and social roles. Columbia Law Review, 96(4), 903–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice. (2016). The national strategy for child exploitation prevention and interdiction: A report to congress. Washington: United States Government.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, M. (2013). Social research methods. South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K. (2005). Sexual offending: Victim, gender and sentencing dilemmas. In D. Chappell & P. Wilson (Eds.), Issues in Australian crime and criminal justice. Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K. (2010). Sentencing for child pornography. Australian Law Journal, 84(6), 384–395.
   Google Scholar
• Winder, B., Gough, B., & Seymour-Smith, S. (2015). Stumbling into sexual crime: The passive perpetrator in accounts by male internet sex offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 167–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K.J., & Ybarra, M.L. (2008). Online ‘predators’ and their victims: Myths, realities, and implications for prevention and treatment. American Psychologist, 63(2), 111–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortley, R., & Smallbone, S. (2012). Internet child pornography: Causes, investigation, and prevention. Santa Barbara, California: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Young v Western Australia (2011). WASCA 13.
   Google Scholar