Psychological reports for sentencing juveniles in Australian courts

References

• Ackerman, M. J. (2006). Forensic report writing. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(1), 59–72. doi:10.1002/jclp.20200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A., & Grisso, T. (2014). Ethical principles and the communication of forensic mental health assessments. Ethics & Behaviour, 24(6), 467–477. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2014.880346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, A., Martin, M., & Allan, M. M. (2000). Assessment for the courts: A survey of Australian psychologists. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 7(2), 150–158. doi: 10.1080/13218710009524981
   Google Scholar
• Allnutt, S. H., & Chaplow, D. (2000). General principles of forensic report writing. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 980–987. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00834.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Psychology Accreditation Council. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.psychologycouncil.org.au/APAC_accredited_psychology_programs_australasia.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. (2007). Code of ethics. Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society. (2013). Ethical guidelines for psychology practice in forensic contexts. Melbourne: Australian Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Aylott, M. (2000). Research priorities: A Delphi survey. Paediatric Nursing, 12(10), 16–20. doi:10.7748/paed.2000.12.12.10.16.c679
   Google Scholar
• Boulkedid, R., Abdoul, H., Loustau, M., Sibony, O., & Alberti, C. (2011). Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20476, 1–9. doi: 10.1371/journal.phone.0020476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky, S. (1999). The expert witness: More maxims and guidelines for testifying in court. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Bowen, E., & Prescott, D. (2017). The forensic psychologist’s report writing guide. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., & Schmidt, F. (2000). Comparison of mental health and legal factors in the disposition outcome of young offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 688–715. doi: 10.1177/0093854800027006002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Children and Young People Act. 2008. (ACT) (Austl.).
   Google Scholar
• Combalbert, N., Andronikof, A., Armand, M., Robin, C., & Bazex, H. (2014). Forensic mental health assessment in France: Recommendations for quality improvement. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 37, 628–634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criminal Law (Sentencing) Act. 1988. (SA) (Austl.).
   Google Scholar
• Cunneen, C., & White, R. (2007). Juvenile Justice: youth and crime in Australia (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunneen, C., White, R., & Richards, K. (2015). Juvenile Justice: youth and crime in Australia (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duits, N., Van Der Hoorn, S., Wiznitzer, M., Wettstein, R. M., & de Beurs, E. (2012). Quality improvement of forensic mental health evaluations and reports of youth in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 440–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence Act. 1995. (Cth) (Austl.).
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton, I., Reddy, P., & Selby, H. (1999). Australian judicial perspectives on expert evidence: An empirical study. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration. Retrieved from http://www.aija.org.au/online/Pub%20no54.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton, I., Reddy, P., & Selby, H. (2001). Australian magistrates and judicial perspectives on expert evidence: A comparative empirical study. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Judicial Administration. Retrieved from www.aija.org.au/online/magexp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Freckelton, I., & Selby, H. (2018). Expert evidence: Law, practice, procedure, and advocacy (6th ed.). Sydney: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Freiberg, A., Fox, R., & Hogan, M. (1988). Sentencing young offenders: Australian Law Reform Commission., - Sentencing Research Paper 11, Sydney: Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, D. P., & Gottschalk, J. A. (2009). Writing forensic reports: A guide for mental health professionals. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. W. (2004). Evaluating the probative value of child custody evaluations. Journal of Child Custody, 1(1), 77–96. doi: 10.1300/J190v01n01_06
   Google Scholar
• Gould, J. W., & Lehrmann, J. D. H. (2002). Evaluating the probative value of child custody evaluations. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 53(2), 17–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6988.2002.tb00059.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (1998). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (2010). Guidance for Improving Forensic Reports: A review of Common errors. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 102–115. Retrieved from http://www.forensicpsychologyunbound.ws/-2012
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (2013). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. 2nd ed. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerreiro, J. D., Casoni, D., & Santos, J. C. (2014). Relevance and coherence as measures of quality in forensic psychological reports. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(6), 890–902. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2014.918077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, V. S. (2006). Variables affecting the clarity of psychological reports. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 82(1), 5–18. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20196
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2647.2000.t01-1-01567.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker, T., & Steinberg, L. (2002). Psychological evaluation at juvenile court disposition. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(3), 300–306. doi:10.1037//0735-7028.33.3.300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., & Brooks, S. (2010). Forensic psychology and forensic science: A proposal agenda for the next decade. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(3), 219–253. doi: 10.1037/a0019138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., DeMatteo, D., & Marczyk, G. (2004). Pragmatic psychology, forensic mental health assessment, and the case of Thomas Johnson: Applying principles to promote quality. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 10, 31–70. doi:10.1037/1076.8971.10.1-2.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., DeMatteo, D., Marczyk, G., & Goldstein, A. M. (2008). Standards of practice and care in forensic mental health assessment: Legal, professional, and principles-based considerations. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 14(1), 1–26. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.14.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., & Goldstein, A. (2009). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., & Locklair, B. (2016). Forensic Assessment of Juveniles. In K. Heilbrun (Editor in Chief), APA handbook of psychology and juvenile justice (pp. 345–363). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/14643-016
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Marczyk, G. R., & DeMatteo, D. (2002). Forensic mental health assessment: A casebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R., & Andrews, D. A. (2010). Forensic mental health assessments: Evaluation for risk of violence in juveniles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., Odgers, S., & Peden, E. (2012). Uniform Evidence Law: commentary and materials (4th ed.). Sydney: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Lander, T. D., & Heilbrun, K. (2009). The content and quality of Forensic Mental Health Assessments: Validation of a principles-based approach. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 115–121. doi: 10.1080/14999010913199324
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, M., & Freckelton, I. (2005). Expert bias and partisanship: A comparison between Australia and the Netherlands. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 11(1), 42–61. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A.D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26, 1753–1760. doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, D. A., & Gould, J. W. (2004). The forensic model. Journal of Child Custody, 1(2), 1–22. doi: 10.1300/J190v01n02_01
   Google Scholar
• Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, S. L., Cruise, K. R., Hinz, H., Holloway, E. D., & Chapman, J. F. (2015). Content, structure, and usefulness of juvenile predisposition psychological evaluations. Child Youth Care Forum, 44, 893–917. doi: 10.1007/s10566-015-9312-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10, 3–5. doi: 10.1177/104973200129778183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman, D. (2013). When forensic examiners disagree: Bias, or just inaccuracy? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(1), 40–55. doi: 10.1037/a0029242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, T. M. S., & Grisso, T. (2014). The cognitive underpinnings of bias in forensic mental health evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(2), 200–211. doi: 10.1037/a0035824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, P. C., & Lurigio, A. J. (2008). Psychosocial predictors of clinicians’ recommendations and judges’ placement orders in a juvenile court. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1429–1448. doi: 10.1177/0093854808324061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packer, I. K. (2008). Specialized practice in forensic psychology: Opportunities and obstacles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39(2), 245–249. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.39.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376–382. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salekin, R. T. (2015). Forensic evaluation and treatment of juveniles: Innovation and best practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Act. 1991. (Vic) (Austl.).
   Google Scholar
• Shuman, D. W., & Zervopoulos, J. A. (2010). Empathy or objectivity: The forensic examiner’s dilemma? Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 28(5), 585–602. doi:10.1002/bsl.953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, R. I., & Gold, L. H. (2004). Textbook of forensic psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, P. A. (2005). ‘No expert should cavil at any questioning’: Reports and assessments for court and tribunals. Australian Social Work, 58(1), 44–57. doi:10.1111/j.0312-407X.2005.00183.x
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. A., & Rosenfeld, B. (2012). Navigating cross-cultural issues in forensic assessment: Recommendations for practice. Professional psychology: Research and Practice, 43(3), 234–240. doi: 10.1037/a0025850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, P. H. (2010). Forensic report checklist. Open Access Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 233–240. Retrieved from http://forensicpsychologyunbound.ws/-2010.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., Day, A., & Hackett, L. (2007). Writing reports for court: A practical guide for psychologists working in forensic contexts. Bowen Hills: Australian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., Day, A., Hackett, L., & Dalby, J. T. (2015). Writing reports for the court: An international guide for psychologists who work in the criminal jurisdiction. Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young Offenders Act. 1994. (WA) (Austl.).
   Google Scholar
• Young Offenders Act. 1997. (NSW) (Austl.).
   Google Scholar